World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
76
Citations
24887
World Ranking
989
National Ranking
24

Jorge M. Lobo publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jorge M. Lobo sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 312 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Jorge M. Lobo D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jorge M. Lobo sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jorge M. Lobo is affiliated with the Spanish National Research Council in Spain and has contributed extensively to the field of environmental science. Their work predominantly focuses on ecological modeling, nature and landscape conservation, and various aspects of ecology, including evolution, behavior, and systematics. The breadth of their research spans significant topics within these areas, particularly concentrating on species distribution and climate change, ecology and vegetation dynamics studies, and wildlife ecology and conservation.

Lobo's research interests also include plant and animal studies, Scarabaeidae beetle taxonomy and biogeography, physiological and biochemical adaptations, and land use and ecosystem services. These topics reflect a detailed engagement with biodiversity, species dynamics, and environmental impacts on ecosystems globally.

Their recent publications encompass multiple studies addressing biodiversity conservation, uncertainty in ecological models, and the influence of climate change on species distribution. Notable papers include:

  • The biased distribution of existing information on biodiversity hinders its use in conservation, and we need an integrative approach to act urgently, 2023, published in Biological Conservation
  • Using maps of biogeographical ignorance to reveal the uncertainty in distributional data hidden in species distribution models, 2021, published in Ecography
  • High uncertainty in the effects of data characteristics on the performance of species distribution models, 2020, published in Ecological Indicators
  • Optimizing biodiversity informatics to improve information flow, data quality, and utility for science and society, 2020, published in Frontiers of Biogeography
  • Predicting the effects of climate change on future freshwater fish diversity at global scale, 2021, published in Nature Conservation

Lobo has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including Emilio García-Roselló, Jacinto González-Dacosta, Joaquín Hortal, Mario Mingarro, and David Sánchez-Fernández. These collaborations have contributed to a range of publications across various ecological and biogeographical topics.

Their work has been published in multiple venues, with repeated contributions to the Journal of Biogeography, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, Insect Conservation and Diversity, and Environmental Conservation. This highlights a diverse publishing record across both broad and specialized environmental science journals.

Best Publications

  • AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models

    Jorge M. Lobo;Alberto Jiménez-Valverde;Raimundo Real

  • Seven Shortfalls that Beset Large-Scale Knowledge of Biodiversity

    Joaquín Hortal;Francesco de Bello;José Alexandre F. Diniz-Filho;Thomas M. Lewinsohn

  • Threshold criteria for conversion of probability of species presence to either–or presence–absence

    Alberto Jiménez-Valverde;Jorge M. Lobo

  • Use of niche models in invasive species risk assessments.

    A. Jiménez-Valverde;A. Jiménez-Valverde;A. T. Peterson;J. Soberón;J. M. Overton

  • Not as good as they seem: the importance of concepts in species distribution modelling

    Alberto Jiménez-Valverde;Jorge M. Lobo;Joaquín Hortal

  • The uncertain nature of absences and their importance in species distribution modelling

    Jorge M. Lobo;Alberto Jiménez-Valverde;Joaquín Hortal

  • Assessing the effects of pseudo-absences on predictive distribution model performance

    Rosa M. Chefaoui;Jorge M. Lobo

  • Accounting for uncertainty when mapping species distributions: The need for maps of ignorance

    Duccio Rocchini;Joaquín Hortal;Szabolcs Lengyel;Jorge M. Lobo

  • Historical bias in biodiversity inventories affects the observed environmental niche of the species

    Joaquín Hortal;Alberto Jiménez‐Valverde;José F. Gómez;Jorge M. Lobo

  • Limitations of Biodiversity Databases: Case Study on Seed‐Plant Diversity in Tenerife, Canary Islands

    Joaquín Hortal;Joaquín Hortal;Joaquín Hortal;Jorge M. Lobo;Alberto Jiménez‐Valverde

  • Coefficient shifts in geographical ecology: an empirical evaluation of spatial and non-spatial regression

    L. Mauricio Bini;J. Alexandre F. Diniz-Filho;Thiago F.L.V.B. Rangel;Thomas S.B. Akre

  • Ice age climate, evolutionary constraints and diversity patterns of European dung beetles

    Joaquin Hortal;Joaquin Hortal;Joaquin Hortal;F. Diniz-Filho;Luis Mauricio Bini;Thiago Fernando Rangel

  • The Effectiveness of Iberian Protected Areas in Conserving Terrestrial Biodiversity

    Miguel B. Araújo;Jorge M. Lobo;Juan C. Moreno

  • Enhanced primers for amplification of DNA barcodes from a broad range of marine metazoans

    Jorge Lobo;Jorge Lobo;Pedro M. Costa;Marcos A. L. Teixeira;Maria S. G. Ferreira

  • Potential distribution modelling, niche characterization and conservation status assessment using GIS tools: A case study of Iberian Copris species

    Rosa M. Chefaoui;Joaquín Hortal;Jorge M. Lobo

  • Spatial and environmental determinants of vascular plant species richness distribution in the Iberian Peninsula and Balearic Islands

    Jorge M. Lobo;Isabel Castro;Juan Carlos Moreno

  • Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models to predict amphibian species richness patterns

    Eduardo Pineda;Jorge M. Lobo

  • Biogeographical and Ecological Factors Affecting the Altitudinal Variation of Mountainous Communities of Coprophagous Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea): a Comparative Study

    Jorge M. Lobo;Gonzalo Halffter

  • Delimiting the geographical background in species distribution modelling

    Pelayo Acevedo;Pelayo Acevedo;Pelayo Acevedo;Alberto Jiménez-Valverde;Jorge M. Lobo;Raimundo Real

  • An ED-based protocol for optimal sampling of biodiversity

    Jorge M. Lobo

  • Using ATLANTIS-Tierra 2.0 and GIS environmental information to predict the spatial distribution and habitat suitability of endemic species

    Joaquín Hortal;Paulo Av Borges;Francisco Dinis;Alberto Jiménez-Valverde

Frequent Co-Authors

Joaquín Hortal
Joaquín Hortal Spanish National Research Council
Alberto Jiménez-Valverde
Alberto Jiménez-Valverde University of Alcalá
David Sánchez-Fernández
David Sánchez-Fernández University of Murcia
Paulo A. V. Borges
Paulo A. V. Borges University of the Azores
Andrés Millán
Andrés Millán University of Murcia
Miguel B. Araújo
Miguel B. Araújo University of Évora
Andrés Baselga
Andrés Baselga University of Santiago de Compostela
Pedro Cardoso
Pedro Cardoso University of Lisbon
Raimundo Real
Raimundo Real University of Malaga
Pelayo Acevedo
Pelayo Acevedo University of Castilla-La Mancha

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degrees and career pathways in the sciences and health fields. Many students with backgrounds in biology consider shifting to allied health careers, which often require additional coursework or certifications.

For instance, if you’re interested in speech and communication, you may explore an online transition to SLP master’s for non-CSD majors program. These bridge programs are designed for those with non-communication sciences undergraduate degrees.

Ecology majors seeking roles in nursing can consider accelerated nursing programs for non nurses online, which help fast-track careers in patient care and public health.

Expanding further, nurse practitioners with environmental science backgrounds may be curious about opportunities in mental health care. You can research psychiatric np salary by state to understand earning potential.

If you’re assessing how quickly you can launch a new healthcare career, it’s also important to know how to become nurse practitioner and possible timelines.

Best Scientists Citing Jorge M. Lobo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles