World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
62
Citations
10954
World Ranking
2112
National Ranking
23

Danilo Russo publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Danilo Russo sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 189 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Danilo Russo D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Danilo Russo sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Danilo Russo is affiliated with the University of Naples Federico II in Italy. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a significant focus on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Ecological Modeling, Genetics, and Infectious Diseases.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, including Bat Biology and Ecology Studies, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Marine Animal Studies Overview, Viral Infections and Vectors, Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior, and Fire Effects on Ecosystems.

Among their recent publications are several articles that address diverse ecological and conservation issues. These include:

  • Bat responses to climate change: a systematic review (2022) published in Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
  • Modelling risks posed by wind turbines and power lines to soaring birds: the black stork (Ciconia nigra) in Italy as a case study (2020) published in Biodiversity and Conservation
  • From Nucleotides to Satellite Imagery: Approaches to Identify and Manage the Invasive Pathogen Xylella fastidiosa and Its Insect Vectors in Europe (2020) published in Sustainability
  • Do We Need to Use Bats as Bioindicators? (2021) published in Biology
  • Generalists yet different: distributional responses to climate change may vary in opportunistic bat species sharing similar ecological traits (2021) published in Mammal Review

Danilo Russo has collaborated frequently with several co-authors. Notable collaborators include Leonardo Ancillotto, Luca Cistrone, Luciano Bosso, Hugo Rebelo, and Valeria B. Salinas-Ramos.

The scientist has contributed publications to a number of academic venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Ecology and Evolution
  • Mammal Review
  • Biology
  • Forest Ecology and Management
  • Mammalian Biology

In addition to journal articles, Danilo Russo has published a book titled "Chiroptera" in 2023 with Springer International Publishing.

Best Publications

  • Identification of twenty‐two bat species (Mammalia: Chiroptera) from Italy by analysis of time‐expanded recordings of echolocation calls

    Danilo Russo;Gareth Jones

  • Sensitivity of bats to urbanization: a review

    Danilo Russo;Leonardo Ancillotto;Leonardo Ancillotto

  • Use of foraging habitats by bats in a Mediterranean area determined by acoustic surveys: conservation implications

    Danilo Russo;Gareth Jones

  • Modelling the impact of agricultural abandonment and wildfires on vertebrate diversity in Mediterranean Europe

    Francisco Moreira;Danilo Russo

  • One strategy does not fit all: determinants of urban adaptation in mammals.

    Luca Santini;Manuela González-Suárez;Danilo Russo;Alejandro Gonzalez-Voyer

  • Roost selection by barbastelle bats (Barbastella barbastellus, Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) in beech woodlands of central Italy: consequences for conservation

    Danilo Russo;Danilo Russo;Luca Cistrone;Gareth Jones;Stefano Mazzoleni

  • The use of automated identification of bat echolocation calls in acoustic monitoring: A cautionary note for a sound analysis

    Danilo Russo;Christian C. Voigt;Christian C. Voigt

  • Novel perspectives on bat insectivory highlight the value of this ecosystem service in farmland: Research frontiers and management implications

    Danilo Russo;Luciano Bosso;Leonardo Ancillotto

  • Habitat selection by the Mediterranean horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus euryale (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) in a rural area of southern Italy and implications for conservation

    Danilo Russo;Gareth Jones;Antonello Migliozzi

  • Shedding light on the effects of climate change on the potential distribution of Xylella fastidiosa in the Mediterranean basin

    Luciano Bosso;Mirko Di Febbraro;Gennaro Cristinzio;Astolfo Zoina

  • Agriculture shapes the trophic niche of a bat preying on multiple pest arthropods across Europe: Evidence from DNA metabarcoding

    Ostaizka Aizpurua;Ivana Budinski;Panagiotis Georgiakakis;Shyam Gopalakrishnan

  • Testing the performances of automated identification of bat echolocation calls: A request for prudence

    Jens Rydell;Stefan Nyman;Johan Eklöf;Gareth A. Jones

  • Extraordinary range expansion in a common bat: the potential roles of climate change and urbanisation.

    L. Ancillotto;L. Santini;N. Ranc;L. Maiorano

  • Curiosity killed the bat: Domestic cats as bat predators

    Leonardo Ancillotto;Maria Tiziana Serangeli;Danilo Russo;Danilo Russo

  • Emergence time in forest bats: the influence of canopy closure

    Danilo Russo;Danilo Russo;Luca Cistrone;Gareth Jones

  • Bats are still not birds in the digital era: Echolocation call variation and why it matters for bat species identification

    Danilo Russo;Danilo Russo;Leonardo Ancillotto;Gareth Jones

  • Spatial and temporal patterns of roost use by tree-dwelling barbastelle bats Barbastella barbastellus

    Danilo Russo;Luca Cistrone;Gareth Jones

  • Modelling geographic distribution and detecting conservation gaps in Italy for the threatened beetle Rosalia alpina

    Luciano Bosso;Hugo Rebelo;Antonio P. Garonna;Danilo Russo;Danilo Russo

  • Divergent echolocation call frequencies in insular rhinolophids (Chiroptera): a case of character displacement?

    Danilo Russo;Mauro Mucedda;Monica Bello;Stefania Biscardi

  • Social communication in bats

    Gloriana Chaverri;Leonardo Ancillotto;Danilo Russo;Danilo Russo

  • Reconsidering the importance of harvested forests for the conservation of tree-dwelling bats

    Danilo Russo;Danilo Russo;Luca Cistrone;Antonio P. Garonna;Gareth Jones

Frequent Co-Authors

Leonardo Ancillotto
Leonardo Ancillotto University of Naples Federico II
Luciano Bosso
Luciano Bosso Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche - CNR
Gareth Jones
Gareth Jones University of Bristol
Hugo Rebelo
Hugo Rebelo University of Lisbon
Emiliano Mori
Emiliano Mori National Research Council (CNR)
Anna Loy
Anna Loy University of Molise
Sandro Bertolino
Sandro Bertolino University of Turin
M. Thomas P. Gilbert
M. Thomas P. Gilbert University of Copenhagen
Carmi Korine
Carmi Korine Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Carlos F. Ibáñez
Carlos F. Ibáñez Karolinska Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution opens doors to diverse career paths, and online degrees can offer flexible options for advancing your education. Many students begin their journey with undergraduate studies and then pursue specialized programs tailored to their professional goals.

For those interested in bridging disciplines, healthcare education is seeing a rise in demand for non-traditional pathways. Options like online direct entry msn programs enable individuals without a nursing background to rapidly earn advanced degrees and pivot their careers.

Value and affordability are key considerations when selecting an online degree. Platforms comparing best value nursing education online wgu and other top nursing options help students make informed choices that fit their budgets and career aspirations. Similarly, seeking the cheapest bsn to msn online can minimize student debt and maximize return on investment.

For those committed to quality and recognition, enrolling in accredited, reputable institutions matters. Resources that list the non profit online schools ensure your degree will be valued by future employers and academic institutions alike.

Best Scientists Citing Danilo Russo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles