World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Christoph F. J. Meyer

Christoph F. J. Meyer

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
34
Citations
4308
World Ranking
7643
National Ranking
756

Christoph F. J. Meyer publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christoph F. J. Meyer sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 84 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Christoph F. J. Meyer D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christoph F. J. Meyer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Christoph F. J. Meyer is affiliated with the University of Salford in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a significant focus on subfields such as Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Ecological Modeling, Artificial Intelligence, and Developmental Biology.

The scientist's work addresses various topics, including:

  • Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Marine Animal Studies Overview
  • Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Plant and Animal Studies

Frequent publication venues for Christoph F. J. Meyer include:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Scientific Data
  • Animal Conservation
  • Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
  • Biodiversity and Conservation

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Meyer include:

  • Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences, 2020, Nature Communications
  • A global database for metacommunity ecology, integrating species, traits, environment and space, 2020, Scientific Data
  • Optimizing bat bioacoustic surveys in human-modified Neotropical landscapes, 2021, Ecological Applications
  • Effects of Forest Fragmentation on the Vertical Stratification of Neotropical Bats, 2020, Diversity
  • Echolocation of Central Amazonian 'whispering' phyllostomid bats: call design and interspecific variation, 2020, Mammal Research

Meyer frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Ricardo Rocha
  • Adrià López-Baucells
  • Fábio Z. Farneda
  • Paulo Estefano Dineli Bobrowiec
  • Jorge M. Palmeirim

Best Publications

  • BioTIME: A database of biodiversity time series for the Anthropocene

    Maria Dornelas;Laura H. Antão;Laura H. Antão;Faye Moyes;Amanda E. Bates;Amanda E. Bates

  • Predicting biodiversity change and averting collapse in agricultural landscapes

    Chase D. Mendenhall;Daniel S. Karp;Christoph F. J. Meyer;Elizabeth A. Hadly

  • An Amazonian rainforest and its fragments as a laboratory of global change

    William F. Laurance;José L.C. Camargo;Philip M. Fearnside;Thomas E. Lovejoy

  • Assemblage‐level responses of phyllostomid bats to tropical forest fragmentation: land‐bridge islands as a model system

    C. F. J. Meyer;Elisabeth Klara Viktoria Kalko;Elisabeth Klara Viktoria Kalko

  • Ecological correlates of vulnerability to fragmentation in Neotropical bats

    Christoph F. J. Meyer;Jochen Frund;Willy Pineda Lizano;Elisabeth Klara Viktoria Kalko;Elisabeth Klara Viktoria Kalko

  • Responses of Tropical Bats to Habitat Fragmentation, Logging, and Deforestation

    Christoph F. J. Meyer;Matthew J. Struebig;Michael R. Willig

  • Trait‐related responses to habitat fragmentation in Amazonian bats

    Fábio Z. Farneda;Fábio Z. Farneda;Ricardo Rocha;Ricardo Rocha;Ricardo Rocha;Adrià López-Baucells;Adrià López-Baucells;Adrià López-Baucells;Milou Groenenberg

  • Effects of tropical forest fragmentation on aerial insectivorous bats in a land-bridge island system

    Sergio Estrada-Villegas;Christoph F. J. Meyer;Elisabeth Klara Viktoria Kalko;Elisabeth Klara Viktoria Kalko

  • Accounting for detectability improves estimates of species richness in tropical bat surveys

    Christoph F. J. Meyer;Christoph F. J. Meyer;Ludmilla M. S. Aguiar;Luis F. Aguirre;Julio Baumgarten

  • Consequences of a large-scale fragmentation experiment for Neotropical bats : disentangling the relative importance of local and landscape-scale effects

    Ricardo Rocha;Adrià López-Baucells;Fábio Z. Farneda;Fábio Z. Farneda;Fábio Z. Farneda;Milou Groenenberg;Milou Groenenberg

  • Bat assemblages on Neotropical land‐bridge islands: nested subsets and null model analyses of species co‐occurrence patterns

    Christoph F. J. Meyer;Elisabeth Klara Viktoria Kalko;Elisabeth Klara Viktoria Kalko

  • Activity patterns and habitat preferences of insectivorous bats in a West African forest-savanna mosaic

    Christoph F. J. Meyer;Christian J. Schwarz;Jakob Fahr

  • Flying high--assessing the use of the aerosphere by bats.

    Elisabeth Klara Viktoria Kalko;Sergio Estrada Villegas;Michael Schmidt;Martin Wegmann

  • Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences

    Alec P. Christie;David Abecasis;Mehdi Adjeroud;Juan C. Alonso

  • Small-Scale Fragmentation Effects on Local Genetic Diversity in Two Phyllostomid Bats with Different Dispersal Abilities in Panama

    Christoph F. J. Meyer;Elisabeth Klara Viktoria Kalko;Elisabeth Klara Viktoria Kalko;Gerald Kerth

  • Long-term monitoring of tropical bats for anthropogenic impact assessment: Gauging the statistical power to detect population change

    Christoph F.J. Meyer;Ludmilla M.S. Aguiar;Luis F. Aguirre;Julio Baumgarten

  • Season-modulated responses of Neotropical bats to forest fragmentation

    Diogo F. Ferreira;Diogo F. Ferreira;Ricardo Rocha;Adrià López-Baucells;Fábio Z. Farneda;Fábio Z. Farneda;Fábio Z. Farneda

  • HOME-RANGE SIZE AND SPACING PATTERNS OF MACROPHYLLUM MACROPHYLLUM (PHYLLOSTOMIDAE) FORAGING OVER WATER

    Christoph F. J. Meyer;Christoph F. J. Meyer;Moritz Weinbeer;Elisabeth Klara Viktoria Kalko;Elisabeth Klara Viktoria Kalko

  • Differential mobility in two small phyllostomid bats, Artibeus watsoni and Micronycteris microtis, in a fragmented neotropical landscape

    Larissa Albrecht;Christoph F. J. Meyer;Elisabeth K. V. Kalko;Elisabeth K. V. Kalko

  • Secondary forest regeneration benefits old-growth specialist bats in a fragmented tropical landscape.

    Ricardo Rocha;Ricardo Rocha;Ricardo Rocha;Otso Ovaskainen;Otso Ovaskainen;Adrià López-Baucells;Adrià López-Baucells;Adrià López-Baucells;Fábio Z. Farneda;Fábio Z. Farneda;Fábio Z. Farneda

  • Activity pattern of the trawling phyllostomid bat, Macrophyllum macrophyllum, in Panama

    Moritz Weinbeer;Christoph F. J. Meyer;Elisabeth K. V. Kalko

Frequent Co-Authors

Adrià López-Baucells
Adrià López-Baucells Museu de Ciències Naturals de Granollers
Jorge M. Palmeirim
Jorge M. Palmeirim University of Lisbon
Elisabeth K. V. Kalko
Elisabeth K. V. Kalko University of Ulm
Otso Ovaskainen
Otso Ovaskainen University of Jyväskylä
Javier Juste
Javier Juste Spanish National Research Council
Carlos F. Ibáñez
Carlos F. Ibáñez Karolinska Institute
Carlos Eduardo Viveiros Grelle
Carlos Eduardo Viveiros Grelle Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
Kathryn E. Stoner
Kathryn E. Stoner Colorado State University
Serge A. Wich
Serge A. Wich Liverpool John Moores University
Ignacio Ribera
Ignacio Ribera Spanish National Research Council

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution opens doors to a wide range of interdisciplinary careers. Many students consider pivoting to related fields or advanced health professions, and online education now makes such transitions more accessible.

For example, professionals with science backgrounds can explore a transition to SLP master’s for non-CSD majors, bridging their expertise toward Speech-Language Pathology. If you're interested in healthcare, there are also online bsn programs for non nurses seeking a swift route into nursing.

Understanding potential earnings is crucial for career planning. For those considering advanced nursing roles, recent data on psych np salary provides insights into regional pay differences, helping job seekers make informed choices.

Time investment is another key concern. Some accelerated programs allow you to move quickly into new roles—in fact, you might be wondering how long to become nurse practitioner. Exploring online degree options in various disciplines gives you the flexibility to tailor your career journey to your goals and timeline.

Best Scientists Citing Christoph F. J. Meyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles