World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
33
Citations
13158
World Ranking
7730
National Ranking
763

Diana E. Bowler publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diana E. Bowler sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 65 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Diana E. Bowler D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diana E. Bowler sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Diana E. Bowler is affiliated with the UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology in the United Kingdom. Their research focuses primarily on environmental science with a strong emphasis on ecology and related subfields.

The main fields of study in Bowler's work include:

  • Environmental Science

The subfields of study encompass:

  • Ecology
  • Ecological Modeling
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Global and Planetary Change

Bowler's research covers several main topics, including:

  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Plant and Animal Studies
  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Freshwater Macroinvertebrate Diversity and Ecology
  • Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services

Among recent publications featuring Diana E. Bowler as an author are:

  • Mapping human pressures on biodiversity across the planet uncovers anthropogenic threat complexes (2020, People and Nature)
  • Meta-analysis reveals declines in terrestrial but increases in freshwater insect abundances (2020, Science)
  • The direct drivers of recent global anthropogenic biodiversity loss (2022, Science Advances)
  • Emerging technologies revolutionise insect ecology and monitoring (2022, Trends in Ecology & Evolution)
  • The recovery of European freshwater biodiversity has come to a halt (2023, Nature)

Diana E. Bowler frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Aletta Bonn
  • Helge Bruelheide
  • David Eichenberg
  • Corey T. Callaghan
  • Florian Jansen

Publishing regularly, Bowler has contributed to various venues, with the most frequent publication outlets being:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Diversity and Distributions
  • Trends in Ecology & Evolution
  • Global Change Biology

Best Publications

  • Urban greening to cool towns and cities: a systematic review of the empirical evidence.

    Diana E. Bowler;Lisette Buyung-Ali;Teri M. Knight;Andrew S. Pullin

  • Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics.

    Diana E. Bowler;Tim G. Benton

  • Meta-analysis reveals declines in terrestrial but increases in freshwater insect abundances.

    Roel van Klink;Diana E. Bowler;Diana E. Bowler;Konstantin B. Gongalsky;Konstantin B. Gongalsky;Ann B. Swengel

  • The geography of biodiversity change in marine and terrestrial assemblages.

    Shane A. Blowes;Sarah R. Supp;Laura H. Antao;Laura H. Antao;Laura H. Antao;Amanda Bates

  • Does community forest management provide global environmental benefits and improve local welfare

    Diana E Bowler;Lisette M Buyung-Ali;John R Healey;Julia Pg Jones

  • Long-term declines of European insectivorous bird populations and potential causes.

    Diana E. Bowler;Henning Heldbjerg;Anthony D. Fox;Maaike de Jong

  • Mapping human pressures on biodiversity across the planet uncovers anthropogenic threat complexes

    Diana E. Bowler;Anne D. Bjorkman;Maria Dornelas;Isla H. Myers-Smith

  • Environmental DNA Time Series in Ecology.

    Miklós Bálint;Markus Pfenninger;Hans-Peter Grossart;Hans-Peter Grossart;Pierre Taberlet

  • A meta-analysis on the impact of different matrix structures on species movement rates

    Amy E. Eycott;Gavin B. Stewart;Gavin B. Stewart;Lisette M. Buyung-Ali;Diana E. Bowler

  • Urban street tree biodiversity and antidepressant prescriptions.

    Melissa R. Marselle;Melissa R. Marselle;Diana E. Bowler;Diana E. Bowler;Jan Watzema;David Eichenberg;David Eichenberg

  • Urbanization drives community shifts towards thermophilic and dispersive species at local and landscape scales

    Elena Piano;Elena Piano;Katrien De Wolf;Katrien De Wolf;Francesca Bona;Dries Bonte

  • Trait-Based Assessments of Climate-Change Impacts on Interacting Species

    Matthias Schleuning;Eike Lena Neuschulz;Jörg Albrecht;Irene M.A. Bender

  • Effective Biodiversity Monitoring Needs a Culture of Integration

    Hjalmar S. Kühl;Hjalmar S. Kühl;Diana E. Bowler;Diana E. Bowler;Diana E. Bowler;Lukas Bösch;Helge Bruelheide;Helge Bruelheide

  • Disproportionate declines of formerly abundant species underlie insect loss

    Unknown

  • Cross-realm assessment of climate change impacts on species’ abundance trends

    Diana E. Bowler;Christian Hof;Peter Haase;Peter Haase;Ingrid Kröncke

  • Widespread decline in Central European plant diversity across six decades.

    David Eichenberg;Diana E Bowler;Diana E Bowler;Aletta Bonn;Aletta Bonn;Helge Bruelheide

  • What are the effects of wooded riparian zones on stream temperature

    Diana E Bowler;Rebecca Mant;Harriet Orr;David M Hannah

  • The evidence base for community forest management as a mechanism for supplying gloval environmental benefits and improving local welfare

    Diana Bowler;Lisette Buyung-Ali;John Healey;Julia P.G. Jones

  • Variation in dispersal mortality and dispersal propensity among individuals: the effects of age, sex and resource availability

    Diana E. Bowler;Tim G. Benton

  • Winners and losers over 35 years of dragonfly and damselfly distributional change in Germany

    Diana E. Bowler;David Eichenberg;Klaus Jürgen Conze;Frank Suhling

  • A Discriminant Function for Predicting Sex in the Balearic Shearwater

    Meritxell Genovart;Miguel McMinn;Diana Bowler;Diana Bowler

  • A cross-taxon analysis of the impact of climate change on abundance trends in central Europe

    D.E. Bowler;P. Haase;I. Kröncke;O. Tackenberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Aletta Bonn
Aletta Bonn Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Helge Bruelheide
Helge Bruelheide Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Katrin Böhning-Gaese
Katrin Böhning-Gaese Goethe University Frankfurt
Amanda E. Bates
Amanda E. Bates Memorial University of Newfoundland
Andrew S. Pullin
Andrew S. Pullin Bangor University
Marten Winter
Marten Winter Leipzig University
Ingolf Kühn
Ingolf Kühn Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Jonathan M. Chase
Jonathan M. Chase Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Mark Vellend
Mark Vellend Université de Sherbrooke
Tim G. Benton
Tim G. Benton Chatham House

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Many students interested in Ecology and Evolution also explore related academic fields to broaden their expertise and future career opportunities. For those considering advanced study in broader biological or humanities contexts, programs like online masters in history can offer valuable interdisciplinary perspectives. Alternatively, information management is crucial for ecological research; obtaining a degree through the cheapest masters in library science helps develop data curation and archival skills applicable to environmental work.

For those interested in communication aspects—essential for conservation outreach and science communication—fields like speech-language pathology (SLP) present viable options. If you already hold a degree in another area, slp bridge programs help you transition efficiently to this profession. Be sure to select asha accredited slp programs to ensure your credential meets industry standards for licensure and employment.

Exploring these online degrees not only expands your knowledge but also opens diverse career pathways, whether in research, education, information management, or communication fields related to Ecology, Evolution, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Diana E. Bowler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles