World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
68
Citations
25069
World Ranking
1839
National Ranking
148

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
67
Citations
24645
World Ranking
8065
National Ranking
618

Overview

Andrew S. Pullin is affiliated with Bangor University in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to environmental science and decision sciences. Their research spans several subfields, including statistics, probability and uncertainty, global and planetary change, general health professions, economics and econometrics, and management science and operations research.

The main focus of Andrew S. Pullin's work includes meta-analysis and systematic reviews, health policy implementation science, evaluation and performance assessment, species distribution and climate change, environmental and social impact assessments, economic and environmental valuation, and flood risk assessment and management.

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Andrew S. Pullin demonstrate an emphasis on evidence synthesis and its applications in environmental policy and management. Notable papers include:

  • Standards of conduct and reporting in evidence syntheses that could inform environmental policy and management decisions, 2022, Environmental Evidence
  • Eight problems with literature reviews and how to fix them, 2020, Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • Evidence Synthesis International (ESI): Position Statement, 2020, Systematic Reviews
  • Strengthen causal models for better conservation outcomes for human well-being, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Environmental evidence in action: on the science and practice of evidence synthesis and evidence-based decision-making, 2023, Environmental Evidence

Andrew S. Pullin collaborates frequently with fellow researchers. Some frequent co-authors include Biljana Macura, Ko Konno, Nicola Randall, Neal Haddaway, and Samantha Cheng.

Their work has been published predominantly in the following venues:

  • Environmental Evidence
  • Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • Systematic Reviews
  • PLoS ONE
  • Research Synthesis Methods

Best Publications

  • Urban greening to cool towns and cities: a systematic review of the empirical evidence.

    Diana E. Bowler;Lisette Buyung-Ali;Teri M. Knight;Andrew S. Pullin

  • A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments

    Diana E Bowler;Lisette M Buyung-Ali;Teri M Knight;Andrew S Pullin

  • The need for evidence-based conservation

    William J. Sutherland;Andrew S. Pullin;Paul M. Dolman;Teri M. Knight

  • Guidelines for Systematic Review in Conservation and Environmental Management

    Andrew S. Pullin;Gavin B. Stewart

  • ROSES RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses: pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps

    Neal R. Haddaway;Biljana Macura;Paul Whaley;Andrew S. Pullin

  • Do conservation managers use scientific evidence to support their decision-making?

    Andrew S Pullin;Teri M Knight;David A Stone;Kevin Charman

  • Application of Systematic Review Methodology to Food and Feed Safety Assessments to Support Decision Making

    Jonathan J. Deeks;Geoff K. Frampton;Julie M. Glanville;Mattias Greiner

  • Biodiversity in urban habitat patches

    P.G. Angold;J.P. Sadler;M.O. Hill;A. Pullin

  • One Hundred Questions of Importance to the Conservation of Global Biological Diversity

    W.J. Sutherland;W.M. Adams;R.B. Aronson;R. Aveling

  • The identification of 100 ecological questions of high policy relevance in the UK

    William J. Sutherland;Susan Armstrong-Brown;Paul R. Armsworth;Brereton Tom

  • Effectiveness in Conservation Practice: Pointers from Medicine and Public Health

    Andrew S. Pullin;Teri M. Knight

  • Doing more good than harm: building an evidence-base for conservation and environmental management.

    Andrew S. Pullin;Teri M. Knight

  • Support for decision making in conservation practice: an evidence-based approach

    Andrew S. Pullin;Teri M. Knight

  • Does community forest management provide global environmental benefits and improve local welfare

    Diana E Bowler;Lisette M Buyung-Ali;John R Healey;Julia Pg Jones

  • Poor evidence-base for assessment of windfarm impacts on birds

    Gavin B. Stewart;Andrew S. Pullin;Christopher F. Coles

  • Effectiveness of Predator Removal for Enhancing Bird Populations

    Rebecca K. Smith;Andrew S. Pullin;Gavin B. Stewart;William J. Sutherland

  • Are hedgerows effective corridors between fragments of woodland habitat? An evidence-based approach

    Zoe G. Davies;Andrew S. Pullin

  • Decision support frameworks and tools for conservation

    Mark W. Schwartz;Carly N. Cook;Robert L. Pressey;Andrew S. Pullin

  • Human well-being impacts of terrestrial protected areas

    Andrew S Pullin;Mukdarut Bangpan;Sarah Dalrymple;Kelly Dickson

  • Eight problems with literature reviews and how to fix them

    Neal R. Haddaway;Neal R. Haddaway;Alison Bethel;Lynn V. Dicks;Lynn V. Dicks;Julia Koricheva

  • A collaboratively-derived science-policy research agenda

    William J. Sutherland;Laura Bellingan;Jim R. Bellingham;Jason J. Blackstock;Jason J. Blackstock

Frequent Co-Authors

William J. Sutherland
William J. Sutherland University of Cambridge
Stefan Schindler
Stefan Schindler Umweltbundesamt, Austria
John R. Healey
John R. Healey Bangor University
Diana E. Bowler
Diana E. Bowler UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology
Chris D. Thomas
Chris D. Thomas University of York
Jeffrey S. Bale
Jeffrey S. Bale University of Birmingham
Michel J. Kaiser
Michel J. Kaiser Heriot-Watt University
Zoe G. Davies
Zoe G. Davies University of Kent
Franz Essl
Franz Essl University of Vienna
Lynn V. Dicks
Lynn V. Dicks University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Environmental Sciences often leads students to explore advanced educational opportunities that complement their field. Many professionals consider online programs that offer flexibility and specialization. For those seeking rapid advancement, 1 year phd programs online no dissertation provide an accelerated path without the extensive research demands of traditional doctorates.

Educators and environmental policy advocates might be interested in transitioning to leadership roles through eds to edd programs online. These programs support career growth by enhancing expertise in administration and curriculum development while balancing professional responsibilities.

For those aiming to integrate social work and environmental justice, a dsw program offers advanced training in social services with a focus on sustainable communities and public welfare.

Additionally, students seeking a broad interdisciplinary foundation may find an affordable online general studies degree an accessible option that can be tailored to include environmental topics alongside other key areas. These diverse pathways reflect the evolving nature of careers in Environmental Sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew S. Pullin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles