World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Hanspeter Naegeli

Hanspeter Naegeli

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
58
Citations
12820
World Ranking
13125
National Ranking
234

Hanspeter Naegeli publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hanspeter Naegeli sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 289 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Hanspeter Naegeli D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hanspeter Naegeli sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hanspeter Naegeli is affiliated with the University of Zurich in Switzerland. Their research spans multiple fields within the life sciences, particularly focusing on agricultural and biological sciences as well as biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology.

The main fields of study for Naegeli include:

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Subfields of their research involve:

  • Plant Science
  • Molecular Biology
  • Food Science
  • Genetics
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Their work covers a range of key topics including:

  • Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Agricultural safety and regulations
  • Insect Resistance and Genetics
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Animal Genetics and Reproduction
  • Intellectual Property and Patents
  • Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing

Hanspeter Naegeli has collaborated frequently with a core group of coauthors consisting of:

  • M. Epstein
  • Nils Rostoks
  • Eve Veromann
  • F. Javier Moreno
  • G. Savoini

Their publications are predominantly found in the following venues:

  • EFSA Journal
  • BMC Veterinary Research
  • EFSA Supporting Publications
  • Veterinary Record Open
  • Scientific Reports

Selected recent papers authored by Hanspeter Naegeli include:

  • "Guidance on risk assessment of nanomaterials to be applied in the food and feed chain: human and animal health," 2021, EFSA Journal
  • "Guidance on technical requirements for regulated food and feed product applications to establish the presence of small particles including nanoparticles," 2021, EFSA Journal
  • "Guidance Document on Scientific criteria for grouping chemicals into assessment groups for human risk assessment of combined exposure to multiple chemicals," 2021, EFSA Journal
  • "Scientific Opinion on development needs for the allergenicity and protein safety assessment of food and feed products derived from biotechnology," 2022, EFSA Journal
  • "Applicability of the EFSA Opinion on site-directed nucleases type 3 for the safety assessment of plants developed using site-directed nucleases type 1 and 2 and oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis," 2020, EFSA Journal

Best Publications

  • Small molecule blockade of transcriptional coactivation of the hypoxia-inducible factor pathway.

    Andrew L. Kung;Sonya D. Zabludoff;Sonya D. Zabludoff;Steven J. Freedman;Steven J. Freedman

  • Guidance on harmonised methodologies for human health, animal health and ecological risk assessment of combined exposure to multiple chemicals

    Simon John More;Vasileios Bampidis;Diane Benford

  • Risks to human and animal health related to the presence of deoxynivalenol and its acetylated and modified forms in food and feed

    Helle Katrine Knutsen;Jan Alexander;Lars Barregård;Margherita Bignami

  • Update: use of the benchmark dose approach in risk assessment

    Anthony Hardy;Diane Benford;Thorhallur Halldorsson;Michael John Jeger

  • Guidance on the use of the weight of evidence approach in scientific assessments.

    Anthony Hardy;Diane Benford;Thorhallur Halldorsson;Michael John Jeger

  • Guidance on risk assessment of the application of nanoscience and nanotechnologies in the food and feed chain: Part 1, human and animal health.

    Anthony Hardy;Diane Benford;Thorhallur Halldorsson;Michael John Jeger

  • Identification of a microcystin in benthic cyanobacteria linked to cattle deaths on alpine pastures in Switzerland

    Konstanze Mez;Kenneth A. Beattie;Geoffrey A. Codd;Kurt Hanselmann

  • Guidance on risk assessment of nanomaterials to be applied in the food and feed chain: human and animal health.

    Simon More;Vasileios Bampidis;Diane Benford

  • Guidance on Uncertainty Analysis in Scientific Assessments

    Diane Benford;Thorhallur Halldorsson;Michael John Jeger;Helle Katrine Knutsen

  • Recognition of DNA Adducts by Human Nucleotide Excision Repair EVIDENCE FOR A THERMODYNAMIC PROBING MECHANISM

    Daniela Gunz;Martin T. Hess;Hanspeter Naegeli

  • Double‐check probing of DNA bending and unwinding by XPA–RPA: an architectural function in DNA repair

    Miriam Missura;Tonko Buterin;Robert Hindges;Ulrich Hübscher

  • Guidance on the use of the Threshold of Toxicological Concern approach in food safety assessment.

    Simon J More;Vasileios Bampidis;Diane Benford

  • Base pair conformation-dependent excision of benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide-guanine adducts by human nucleotide excision repair enzymes.

    Martin T. Hess;Daniela Gunz;Natalia Luneva;Nicholas E. Geacintov

  • Critical review of the safety assessment of titanium dioxide additives in food.

    Hans Christian Winkler;Tina Notter;Urs Meyer;Hanspeter Naegeli

  • Guidance on allergenicity assessment of genetically modified plants

    Hanspeter Naegeli;Andrew Nicholas Birch;Josep Casacuberta

  • Bipartite substrate discrimination by human nucleotide excision repair

    Martin T. Hess;Urs Schwitter;Mario Petretta;Bernd Giese

  • Unrepaired fjord region polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-DNA adducts in ras codon 61 mutational hot spots.

    Tonko Buterin;Martin T. Hess;Natalia Luneva;Nicholas E. Geacintov

  • Thermodynamic and structural factors in the removal of bulky DNA adducts by the nucleotide excision repair machinery.

    Nicholas E. Geacintov;Suse Broyde;Tonko Buterin;Hanspeter Naegeli

  • The principles and methods behind EFSA's Guidance on Uncertainty Analysis in Scientific Assessment

    Diane Benford;Thorhallur Halldorsson;Michael John Jeger;Helle Katrine Knutsen

  • Histone shuttling by poly ADP-ribosylation.

    Felix R. Althaus;Liane Höfferer;Hanna E. Kleczkowska;Maria Malanga

Frequent Co-Authors

Huw Jones
Huw Jones Aberystwyth University
Joe N. Perry
Joe N. Perry Rothamsted Research
Francesco Visioli
Francesco Visioli University of Padua
Kaare Magne Nielsen
Kaare Magne Nielsen University of Tromsø - The Arctic University of Norway
Simon J. More
Simon J. More University College Dublin
Dominique Turck
Dominique Turck University of Lille
Dieter Schrenk
Dieter Schrenk Technical University of Kaiserslautern
Søren Saxmose Nielsen
Søren Saxmose Nielsen University of Copenhagen
Claude Bragard
Claude Bragard Université Catholique de Louvain
Nicholas E. Geacintov
Nicholas E. Geacintov New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens doors to a wide range of exciting careers—and many of these pathways are now accessible via online degrees. Advances in online education let students specialize further or gain interdisciplinary skills, making it easier for working professionals to earn advanced credentials without relocating.

For those looking to move into healthcare management and leadership roles, a doctorate in healthcare administration online can position graduates for executive jobs in hospitals or public health organizations. If pharmacy is your passion, consider online pharmd programs for non pharmacists—designed for students seeking pharmacy careers from a non-pharmacy background.

Those interested in the science of human movement can pursue an online bachelor's degree in exercise science to enter roles in fitness coaching, wellness, or rehabilitation. Similarly, a kinesiology degree online prepares students for work in sports science, occupational therapy, or further graduate study.

With flexible online options, students can build a unique skill set and follow diverse career trajectories—often while balancing work or other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Hanspeter Naegeli

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles