World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
63
Citations
15838
World Ranking
10126
National Ranking
286

Pier Sandro Cocconcelli publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pier Sandro Cocconcelli sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 619 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Pier Sandro Cocconcelli D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pier Sandro Cocconcelli sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Pier Sandro Cocconcelli is affiliated with the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart in Italy. Their research spans several scientific disciplines with a focus on Medicine, Agricultural and Biological Sciences, and Environmental Science. The scientist's work covers major subfields such as Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Food Science, Dermatology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, and Pollution.

The main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Occupational exposure and asthma
  • Agricultural safety and regulations
  • Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
  • Environmental Policies and Emissions
  • Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Pier Sandro Cocconcelli illustrate a focus on risk assessment, food safety, and environmental impacts:

  • "Re-evaluation of the risks to public health related to the presence of bisphenol A (BPA) in foodstuffs," 2023, EFSA Journal
  • "Food manufacturing processes and technical data used in the exposure assessment of food enzymes," 2023, EFSA Journal
  • "Low density polyethylene degradation by filamentous fungi," 2021, Environmental Pollution
  • "Process-specific technical data used in exposure assessment of food enzymes," 2021, EFSA Journal
  • "Fate of Biodegradable Polymers Under Industrial Conditions for Anaerobic Digestion and Aerobic Composting of Food Waste," 2020, Journal of Polymers and the Environment

Frequent co-authors collaborating with this scientist include Laurence Vernis, José Manuel Barat Baviera, Claudia Bolognesi, Alicja Mortensen, and Konrad Grob. These collaborations span a significant number of publications, demonstrating established academic partnerships.

Key venues where Pier Sandro Cocconcelli's work is published include:

  • EFSA Journal
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Frontiers in Microbiology
  • Microorganisms
  • Frontiers in Plant Science

The scientist's research contributes to advancing knowledge in areas related to occupational health, environmental safety, and food science, addressing topics such as exposure risk assessments, degradation of polymers, and public health implications of chemical substances in foodstuffs.

Best Publications

  • Guidance on the characterisation of microorganisms used as feed additives or as production organisms

    Efsa Panel on Additives;Guido Rychen;Gabriele Aquilina

  • Guidance on the assessment of the safety of feed additives for the target species

    Efsa Panel on Additives;Guido Rychen;Gabriele Aquilina

  • Guidance on the assessment of the safety of feed additives for the consumer.

    Efsa Panel on Additives;Guido Rychen;Gabriele Aquilina

  • Guidance on the identity, characterisation and conditions of use of feed additives.

    Guido Rychen;Gabriele Aquilina;Giovanna Azimonti;Vasileios Bampidis

  • Characterization of the lactic acid bacteria in artisanal dairy products

    Timothy M. Cogan;Manuela Barbosa;Eric Beuvier;Bruna Bianchi-Salvadori

  • Guidance on the assessment of the efficacy of feed additives.

    Guido Rychen;Gabriele Aquilina;Giovanna Azimonti;Vasileios Bampidis

  • Update of the list of QPS-recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 13: suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until September 2020.

    Kostas Koutsoumanis;Ana Allende;Avelino Alvarez-Ordóñez

  • Scientific Opinion on the update of the list of QPS-recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA

    Antonia Ricci;Ana Allende;Declan Bolton

  • EMA and EFSA Joint Scientific Opinion on measures to reduce the need to use antimicrobial agents in animal husbandry in the European Union, and the resulting impacts on food safety (RONAFA)

    David Murphy;Antonia Ricci

  • Update of the risk assessment of di-butylphthalate (DBP), butyl-benzyl-phthalate (BBP), bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP), di-isononylphthalate (DINP) and di-isodecylphthalate (DIDP) for use in food contact materials

    Vittorio Silano;José Manuel Barat Baviera

  • Scientific Guidance for the submission of dossiers on Food Enzymes

    Claude Lambré;José Manuel Barat Baviera

  • Review and priority setting for substances that are listed without a specific migration limit in Table 1 of Annex 1 of Regulation 10/2011 on plastic materials and articles intended to come into contact with food.

    Vittorio Silano;Josè Manuel Barat Baviera

  • Monitoring the bacterial population dynamics during fermentation of artisanal Argentinean sausages.

    Cecilia Alejandra Fontana;Pier Sandro Cocconcelli;Graciela Margarita Vignolo

  • Development of RAPD protocol for typing of strains of lactic acid bacteria and enterococci.

    P.S. Cocconcelli;D. Porro;S. Galandini;L. Senini

  • Characterisation of microorganisms used for the production of food enzymes.

    Vittorio Silano;José Manuel Barat Baviera

  • Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed(FEEDAP) on a request from the European Commission on the safety and efficacy of AveMix® 02 CS/L (endo-1,3(4)-β-glucanase, endo-1,4-β-xylanase and pectinase) as feed additive for weaned piglets.

    Efsa Panel on Additives;P.O.S.U.I.A.F.G. Aquilina;G. Bories;P. Brantom

  • The acid-stress response in Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis CB1.

    Maria De Angelis;Luca Bini;Vitaliano Pallini;Pier Sandro Cocconcelli

  • Qualified presumption of safety (QPS): a generic risk assessment approach for biological agents notified to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)

    Renata G.K. Leuschner;Tobin P. Robinson;Marta Hugas;Pier Sandro Cocconcelli

  • Analysis of exopolysaccharide production by Lactobacillus casei CG11, isolated from cheese.

    M Kojic;M Vujcic;A Banina;P Cocconcelli

  • High frequency of conjugation in Lactobacillus mediated by an aggregation-promoting factor

    Roberto Reniero;Piersandro Cocconcelli;Vittorio Bottazzi;Lorenzo Morelli

Frequent Co-Authors

Roberto Edoardo Villa
Roberto Edoardo Villa University of Milan
Baltasar Mayo
Baltasar Mayo Spanish National Research Council
Henk van Loveren
Henk van Loveren Maastricht University
Claudia Bolognesi
Claudia Bolognesi National Cancer Research Institute, UK
Alberto Mantovani
Alberto Mantovani Humanitas University
Lieve Herman
Lieve Herman Flemish Community
Yolanda Sanz
Yolanda Sanz Spanish National Research Council
Henrik Christensen
Henrik Christensen University of Copenhagen
Noël Dierick
Noël Dierick Ghent University
Sirpa Kärenlampi
Sirpa Kärenlampi University of Eastern Finland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry opens many doors beyond the traditional laboratory route. Students can connect their scientific background with in-demand healthcare roles, many of which are accessible through flexible online programs.

For those interested in the administrative and data-driven side of medicine, consider learning more about the medical billing and coding job outlook. This career can often be launched with a short certification course and offers opportunities to work remotely.

Managing patient information and health data is crucial in modern healthcare. If you want a dynamic role blending science, technology, and management, an accredited health information management online degree could be a strong option.

For those drawn to nutrition science, there are highly-ranked and affordable programs for continuing your education, such as a cheapest online master’s in nutrition. This degree prepares graduates for roles in healthcare settings, industry, or wellness consulting.

Lastly, if you're interested in direct patient care utilizing technology, accredited ultrasound tech school online programs provide a path into diagnostic medical sonography—an important and rapidly-growing healthcare field.

Best Scientists Citing Pier Sandro Cocconcelli

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles