World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
48
Citations
7012
World Ranking
5618
National Ranking
378

Peter Hoffmann publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Hoffmann sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 209 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Peter Hoffmann D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Hoffmann sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1989 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada Academy of the Arts and Humanities

Overview

Peter Hoffmann is affiliated with the University of Rostock in Germany and has published extensively in the field of Medicine, focusing notably on Ophthalmology and related subfields.

Their recent publications cover a range of topics including intraocular lens power calculation, visual outcomes after lens implantation, and the impact of environmental factors on sepsis patients. Some of the notable recent papers include:

  • Sources of Error in Toric Intraocular Lens Power Calculation (2020), Journal of Refractive Surgery
  • Project hyperopic power prediction: accuracy of 13 different concepts for intraocular lens calculation in short eyes (2021), British Journal of Ophthalmology
  • Fever and hypothermia represent two populations of sepsis patients and are associated with outside temperature (2021), Critical Care
  • Considerations on the Castrop formula for calculation of intraocular lens power (2021), PLoS ONE
  • Comparison of 3-month visual outcomes of a new multifocal intraocular lens vs a trifocal intraocular lens (2022), Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery

Research collaboration has been a significant component of Hoffmann's work. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Achim Langenbucher (67 collaborations)
  • Jascha Wendelstein (63 collaborations)
  • Nóra Szentmáry (52 collaborations)
  • Alan Cayless (49 collaborations)
  • Matthias Bolz (10 collaborations)

Their work has often been published in several established venues such as:

  • Acta Ophthalmologica (15 publications)
  • PLoS ONE (12 publications)
  • Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (7 publications)
  • Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology (7 publications)
  • Current Eye Research (5 publications)

Hoffmann's research fields span Medicine with particular focus on subfields like Epidemiology, Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, as well as segments of Public Health and Environmental Health.

Their main research topics consist of:

  • Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
  • Corneal surgery and disorders
  • Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
  • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
  • Climate variability and models
  • Climate Change and Health Impacts

Among the awards received, Hoffmann was named a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada in 1989, recognizing their contributions within the Academy of the Arts and Humanities.

Best Publications

  • Generating WUDAPT Level 0 data – Current status of production and evaluation

    Benjamin Bechtel;Paul J. Alexander;Christoph Beck;Jürgen Böhner

  • Comparing impacts of climate change on streamflow in four large African river basins

    V. Aich;S. Liersch;T. Vetter;S. Huang

  • Latitudinal and longitudinal variability of mesospheric winds and temperatures during stratospheric warming events

    P. Hoffmann;W. Singer;D. Keuer;W.K. Hocking

  • Seasonal variation of mesospheric waves at northern middle and high latitudes

    Peter Hoffmann;Erich Becker;Werner Singer;Manja Placke

  • Neutral air turbulence and temperatures in the vicinity of polar mesosphere summer echoes

    Franz-Josef Lübken;Markus Rapp;Peter Hoffmann

  • On the consistency of model, ground‐based, and satellite observations of tidal signatures: Initial results from the CAWSES tidal campaigns

    W. E. Ward;J. Oberheide;L. P. Goncharenko;T. Nakamura

  • Solar cycle dependence and long-term trends in the wind field of the mesosphere/lower thermosphere

    J. Bremer;R. Schminder;K.M. Greisiger;P. Hoffmann

  • Long‐term trends and solar cycle variations of mesospheric temperature and dynamics

    D. Offermann;P. Hoffmann;P. Knieling;R. Koppmann

  • Neutral air density variations during strong planetary wave activity in the mesopause region derived from meteor radar observations

    G. Stober;C. Jacobi;V. Matthias;P. Hoffmann

  • Variability of the mesospheric wind field at middle and Arctic latitudes in winter and its relation to stratospheric circulation disturbances

    P Hoffmann;W Singer;D Keuer

  • Biogeophysical impacts of forestation in Europe: first results from the LUCAS (Land Use and Climate Across Scales) regional climate model intercomparison

    Edouard Léopold Davin;Diana Rechid;Marcus Breil;Rita M. Cardoso

  • Mean seasonal and diurnal variations of PMSE and winds from 4 years of radar observations at ALOMAR

    P. Hoffmann;W. Singer;J. Bremer

  • Climatology of the semidiurnal tide at 52–56°N from ground-based radar wind measurements 1985–1995

    Ch. Jacobi;Yu.I. Portnyagin;T.V. Solovjova;P. Hoffmann

  • Mesopause dynamics from the scandinavian triangle of radars within the PSMOS-DATAR Project

    A. H. Manson;C. E. Meek;C. M. Hall;S. Nozawa

  • Upper mesospheric lunar tides over middle and high latitudes during sudden stratospheric warming events

    J. L. Chau;P. Hoffmann;N. M. Pedatella;V. Matthias

  • Trends of mesospheric gravity waves at northern middle latitudes during summer

    P. Hoffmann;M. Rapp;W. Singer;D. Keuer

  • Evaluation of New CORDEX Simulations Using an Updated Köppen–Trewartha Climate Classification

    Armelle Reca Remedio;Claas Teichmann;Lars Buntemeyer;Kevin Sieck

  • Global study of northern hemisphere quasi-2-day wave events in recent summers near 90 km altitude

    C. E. Meek;A. H. Manson;Steven J Franke;W. Singer

  • Evaluating reanalysis-driven CORDEX regional climate models over Australia: model performance and errors

    Giovanni Di Virgilio;Jason P. Evans;Alejandro Di Luca;Roman Olson;Roman Olson

  • PMSE observations at three different frequencies in northern Europe during summer 1994

    J. Bremer;P. Hoffmann;A. H. Manson;C. E. Meek

  • NLC and the background atmosphere above ALOMAR

    J. Fiedler;G. Baumgarten;U. Berger;P. Hoffmann

  • Polar mesospheric horizontal divergence and relative vorticity measurements using multiple specular meteor radars

    Jorge L. Chau;Gunter Stober;Chris M. Hall;Masaki Tsutsumi

  • Assessing mean climate change signals in the global CORDEX-CORE ensemble

    Claas Teichmann;Daniela Jacob;Armelle Reca Remedio;Erika Coppola

Frequent Co-Authors

Werner Singer
Werner Singer University of Rostock
Markus Rapp
Markus Rapp German Aerospace Center
C. E. Meek
C. E. Meek University of Saskatchewan
A. H. Manson
A. H. Manson University of Saskatchewan
Franz-Josef Lübken
Franz-Josef Lübken University of Rostock
Jorge L. Chau
Jorge L. Chau University of Rostock
Jens Oberheide
Jens Oberheide Clemson University
Takuji Nakamura
Takuji Nakamura National Institute of Polar Research
Scott Palo
Scott Palo University of Colorado Boulder
Nicholas J. Mitchell
Nicholas J. Mitchell University of Bath

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in broadening their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, pursuing an advanced degree online offers flexible options. Many students explore online edd no dissertation programs to accelerate their education without the extensive research commitment typically required. This is ideal for professionals seeking leadership roles in education or policy related to environmental issues.

Additionally, pathways like the online eds to edd bridge program provide a seamless transition for educators aiming to enhance their doctoral qualifications. These programs emphasize practical skills suited to environmental education and administration.

For those drawn to social work connected to environmental justice and community health, affordable options such as dsw programs offer advanced training to impact social policies and advocacy effectively.

Alternatively, a low cost online general studies degree can provide a foundational multidisciplinary approach, perfect for individuals seeking flexible, cost-effective education that can complement environmental expertise with broader skills.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Hoffmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles