World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 36 9477 8860 5023 4578 93 6060

Pamela M. Greenwood publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Pamela M. Greenwood between 1977 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Pamela M. Greenwood published across 46 years, from 1977 to 2022, averaging 2.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2012. 2 of the 101 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2012. 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 18 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 6 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 2 publications
1977 2022

101 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Pamela M. Greenwood: publications per year, 1977 to 2022
Year Publications
1977 1
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 1
1988 0
1989 1
1990 0
1991 1
1992 1
1993 1
1994 1
1995 1
1996 1
1997 2
1998 2
1999 2
2000 5
2001 1
2002 1
2003 1
2004 2
2005 6
2006 2
2007 2
2008 0
2009 5
2010 6
2011 0
2012 18
2013 1
2014 6
2015 0
2016 7
2017 2
2018 2
2019 15
2020 2
2021 0
2022 2
Total 101
Download as CSV

Pamela M. Greenwood publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pamela M. Greenwood sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 93 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 93
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Pamela M. Greenwood D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pamela M. Greenwood sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 36
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Pamela M. Greenwood is affiliated with George Mason University in the United States. Their research spans multiple intersecting fields, primarily focusing on psychology, neuroscience, and computer science. The subfields of their work include social psychology, cognitive neuroscience, safety and quality assessment, physical therapy and rehabilitation, and demography.

The main topics addressed in Greenwood's research involve human-automation interaction and safety, traffic and road safety, safety warnings and signage, driving studies in older adults, technology use by older adults, dementia and cognitive impairment, and psychological well-being and life satisfaction.

Greenwood has contributed to recent academic papers published in a variety of journals and platforms. These publications include the following:

  • "Advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS): Demographics, preferred sources of information, and accuracy of ADAS knowledge" (2022) in Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
  • "Editorial: Cognitive and Brain Aging: Interventions to Promote Well-Being in Old Age" (2020) in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
  • "Preferred Sources of Information, Knowledge, and Acceptance of Automated Vehicle Systems: Effects of Gender and Age" (2022) in Frontiers in Psychology
  • "How do eyes and brain search a randomly structured uninformative scene? Exploiting a basic interplay of attention and memory" (2020) in arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Greenwood include Carryl L. Baldwin, John Lenneman, Lorenzo Resca, and T. D. Keech. Among these, Carryl L. Baldwin has coauthored multiple works with Greenwood.

Greenwood's work has appeared in various publication venues such as Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Frontiers in Psychology, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, and arXiv (Cornell University).

Best Publications

  • The frontal aging hypothesis evaluated

    Pamela M. Greenwood

  • Functional plasticity in cognitive aging: review and hypothesis.

    P. M. Greenwood

  • VISUOSPATIAL ATTENTION IN DEMENTIA OF THE ALZHEIMER TYPE

    Raja Parasuraman;Pamela M. Greenwood;James V. Haxby;Cheryl L. Grady

  • BDNF mediates improvements in executive function following a 1-year exercise intervention.

    Regina L. Leckie;Lauren E. Oberlin;Michelle W. Voss;Ruchika S. Prakash

  • Placebo effects in cognitive training.

    Cyrus K. Foroughi;Samuel S. Monfort;Martin Paczynski;Patrick E. McKnight

  • Neuronal and Cognitive Plasticity: A Neurocognitive Framework for Ameliorating Cognitive Aging

    Pamela M. Greenwood;Raja Parasuraman

  • Effects of Apolipoprotein E Genotype on Spatial Attention, Working Memory, and Their Interaction in Healthy, Middle-Aged Adults: Results From the National Institute of Mental Health’s BIOCARD Study

    P. M. Greenwood;Chantal Lambert;Trey Sunderland;Raja Parasuraman

  • Changes in visuospatial attention over the adult lifespan

    Pamela M. Greenwood;Raja Parasuraman;James V. Haxby

  • Beyond heritability: neurotransmitter genes differentially modulate visuospatial attention and working memory.

    Raja Parasuraman;Pamela M. Greenwood;Reshma Kumar;John Fossella

  • Genetics and visual attention: Selective deficits in healthy adult carriers of the ɛ4 allele of the apolipoprotein E gene

    Pamela M. Greenwood;Trey Sunderland;Judy L. Friz;Raja Parasuraman

  • The apolipoprotein E gene, attention, and brain function

    Raja Parasuraman;Pamela M. Greenwood;Trey Sunderland

  • Scale of attentional focus in visual search.

    P. M. Greenwood;Raja Parasuraman

  • Neurocognitive enhancement in older adults: comparison of three cognitive training tasks to test a hypothesis of training transfer in brain connectivity.

    Maren Strenziok;Raja Parasuraman;Ellen Clarke;Dean S. Cisler

  • Sustained-attention capacity in young and older adults.

    Raja Parasuraman;Paul G. Nestor;Pamela Greenwood

  • Controlling the focus of spatial attention during visual search: effects of advanced aging and Alzheimer disease

    Pamela M. Greenwood;Raja Parasuraman;Gene E. Alexander

  • The scaling of spatial attention in visual search and its modification in healthy aging.

    P. M. Greenwood;Raja Parasuraman

  • Normal Genetic Variation, Cognition, and Aging

    P. M. Greenwood;Raja Parasuraman

  • Brain mechanisms of involuntary visuospatial attention: an event-related potential study.

    Shimin Fu;Shimin Fu;Pamela M. Greenwood;Raja Parasuraman

  • Dissociation of visual C1 and P1 components as a function of attentional load: An event-related potential study

    Shimin Fu;Shimin Fu;John R. Fedota;Pamela M. Greenwood;Raja Parasuraman

  • Interactive effects of APOE and CHRNA4 on attention and white matter volume in healthy middle-aged and older adults

    Thomas Espeseth;Pamela M. Greenwood;Ivar Reinvang;Anders M. Fjell

  • Attentional disengagement deficit in nondemented elderly over 75 years of age

    Pamela M. Greenwood;Raja Parasuraman

Frequent Co-Authors

Raja Parasuraman
Raja Parasuraman George Mason University
Gene E. Alexander
Gene E. Alexander University of Arizona
Thomas Espeseth
Thomas Espeseth University of Oslo
James V. Haxby
James V. Haxby Dartmouth College
Yuejia Luo
Yuejia Luo Shenzhen University
Kirk I. Erickson
Kirk I. Erickson University of Pittsburgh
Astri J. Lundervold
Astri J. Lundervold University of Bergen
Glenn E. Smith
Glenn E. Smith University of Florida
Edward McAuley
Edward McAuley University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Cheryl L. Grady
Cheryl L. Grady University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology offers access to a wide range of online degrees and career pathways, especially through related fields such as social work. Online social work programs are gaining popularity for their flexibility and comprehensive curriculum, making them an excellent option for those looking to work in clinical settings, community organizations, or educational institutions.

When considering your options, you can explore region-specific programs to find the best fit for your needs. For example, discover the best social work programs in Minnesota or review the best social work degree programs in Mississippi for high-quality online and on-campus options.

Many students prefer studying in vibrant cities, making it worthwhile to consider the best social work degrees in Nashville, which offer specialized training and local networking opportunities. Additionally, those interested in northern states can research the best social work programs in North Dakota.

No matter which path you choose, earning an online degree in psychology or social work can open doors to rewarding roles in counseling, advocacy, research, and community support.

Best Scientists Citing Pamela M. Greenwood

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles