World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 107 436 280 430 62687

Raja Parasuraman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Raja Parasuraman between 1975 and 2019, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Raja Parasuraman published across 45 years, from 1975 to 2019, averaging 10.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 41 publications in 2015. 7 of the 466 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1975 to 2019. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 41. Peak 41 publications in 2015. 1975: 3 publications 1976: 3 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 1 publication 1980: 3 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 2 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 3 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 8 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 12 publications 1992: 9 publications 1993: 12 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 12 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 19 publications 2001: 15 publications 2002: 14 publications 2003: 23 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 30 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 39 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 27 publications 2015: 41 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 1 publication
1975 2019

466 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Raja Parasuraman: publications per year, 1975 to 2019
Year Publications
1975 3
1976 3
1977 2
1978 1
1979 1
1980 3
1981 1
1982 2
1983 1
1984 3
1985 3
1986 3
1987 8
1988 2
1989 4
1990 4
1991 12
1992 9
1993 12
1994 2
1995 4
1996 7
1997 11
1998 12
1999 7
2000 19
2001 15
2002 14
2003 23
2004 10
2005 16
2006 15
2007 14
2008 14
2009 18
2010 30
2011 12
2012 39
2013 17
2014 27
2015 41
2016 11
2017 4
2018 6
2019 1
Total 466
Download as CSV

Raja Parasuraman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raja Parasuraman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 421–430 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 430 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50 430
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Raja Parasuraman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raja Parasuraman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 106–107 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 107 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46 107
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1994 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Raja Parasuraman was affiliated with George Mason University in the United States. Their academic work is recognized within the scientific community, marked by contributions to broader fields of study despite the limited available data on their specific research topics and publications.

Parasuraman was awarded the title of Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1994, indicating recognition by peers for contributions to the advancement of science.

Though detailed records of their publications, coauthors, and research topics are not provided, their professional affiliation and award reflect an active engagement with academic research during their career.

Best Publications

  • Engineering Psychology and Human Performance

    Christopher D. Wickens;Justin G. Hollands;Simon Banbury;Raja Parasuraman

  • A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation

    R. Parasuraman;T.B. Sheridan;C.D. Wickens

  • A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction.

    Peter A. Hancock;Deborah R. Billings;Kristin E. Schaefer;Jessie Y. C. Chen

  • The Psychology of Vigilance

    Michael Loeb;D. R. Davies;R. Parasuraman

  • Complacency and bias in human use of automation: an attentional integration.

    Raja Parasuraman;Dietrich H. Manzey

  • Vigilance Requires Hard Mental Work and Is Stressful

    Joel S. Warm;Raja Parasuraman;Gerald Matthews

  • Performance Consequences of Automation-Induced 'Complacency'

    Raja Parasuraman;Robert Molloy;Indramani L. Singh

  • The attentive brain.

    Raja Parasuraman

  • Situation Awareness, Mental Workload, and Trust in Automation: Viable, Empirically Supported Cognitive Engineering Constructs

    Raja Parasuraman;Thomas B. Sheridan;Christopher D. Wickens

  • Human-Automation Interaction

    Thomas B. Sheridan;Raja Parasuraman

  • Almost human: Anthropomorphism increases trust resilience in cognitive agents.

    Ewart J. de Visser;Samuel S. Monfort;Ryan McKendrick;Melissa A. B. Smith

  • Visual sustained attention: image degradation produces rapid sensitivity decrement over time

    Keith H. Nuechterlein;Raja Parasuraman;Qiyuan Jiang

  • Designing for flexible interaction between humans and automation: delegation interfaces for supervisory control.

    Christopher A. Miller;Raja Parasuraman

  • Humans : Still Vital After All These Years of Automation

    Raja Parasuraman;Christopher D. Wickens

  • Memory load and event rate control sensitivity decrements in sustained attention.

    Raja Parasuraman

  • Battery powered thought: Enhancement of attention, learning, and memory in healthy adults using transcranial direct current stimulation

    Brian A. Coffman;Vincent P. Clark;Raja Parasuraman

  • Psychophysiology and adaptive automation

    Evan A Byrne;Raja Parasuraman

  • Neuroergonomics: The Brain at Work

    Raja Parasuraman;Matthew Rizzo

  • Monitoring an Automated System for a Single Failure: Vigilance and Task Complexity Effects:

    Robert Molloy;Raja Parasuraman

  • The vigilance decrement reflects limitations in effortful attention, not mindlessness.

    Rebecca A. Grier;Joel S. Warm;William N. Dember;Gerald Matthews

  • Current trends in event-related potential research

    Ray Johnson;John W. Rohrbaugh;R. Parasuraman

  • Neuroergonomics: Research and practice.

    Raja Parasuraman

Frequent Co-Authors

Pamela M. Greenwood
Pamela M. Greenwood George Mason University
Peter A. Hancock
Peter A. Hancock University of Central Florida
Joel S. Warm
Joel S. Warm United States Air Force Research Laboratory
James L. Szalma
James L. Szalma University of Central Florida
Robert R. Hoffman
Robert R. Hoffman Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition
Hasan Ayaz
Hasan Ayaz Drexel University
Christopher D. Wickens
Christopher D. Wickens Colorado State University
Gerald Matthews
Gerald Matthews George Mason University
William N. Dember
William N. Dember University of Cincinnati
James V. Haxby
James V. Haxby Dartmouth College

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in psychology opens doors to numerous online programs and professional avenues. In particular, becoming a school counselor is a popular career pathway that blends psychology knowledge with educational support.

Each state has its own requirements for aspiring school counselors. For example, if you’re interested in learning how to become a school counselor in Hawaii, you’ll find that a relevant master’s degree and specific licensure exams are essential. Similarly, understanding how to become a school counselor in Idaho involves coursework in counseling, supervised internships, and state certification.

Requirements can vary further in other states. For those looking into how to become a school counselor in Illinois, the process includes a state-approved program and passing an exam. Meanwhile, the requirements to be a school counselor in Indiana emphasize graduate education and a strong focus on developmental and educational psychology.

As online learning grows, accredited psychology degrees increasingly support students pursuing licensure and counseling roles nationwide.

Best Scientists Citing Raja Parasuraman

Recently Published Articles