World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
64
Citations
15574
World Ranking
2970
National Ranking
1707

Neuroscience

D-Index
64
Citations
15576
World Ranking
3251
National Ranking
1509

Frank Krueger publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank Krueger sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 207 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Frank Krueger D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank Krueger sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frank Krueger is affiliated with George Mason University in the United States. Their research is concentrated primarily in the fields of neuroscience and psychology, with a substantial focus on cognitive neuroscience and social psychology. The subfields of their work also include experimental and cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, and psychiatry and mental health.

The main topics covered by their publications encompass neural and behavioral psychology studies, functional brain connectivity studies, and the psychology of moral and emotional judgment. Other significant areas of research include memory and neural mechanisms, psychosomatic disorders and their treatments, psychopathy, forensic psychiatry, sexual offending, and neuroendocrine regulation and behavior.

Frank Krueger has contributed to a range of scientific articles, including:

  • "Neural signatures of prosocial behaviors" (2020), Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • "Prediction of trust propensity from intrinsic brain morphology and functional connectome" (2020), Human Brain Mapping
  • "The emerging neuroscience of social punishment: Meta-analytic evidence" (2020), Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • "Human-dog relationships as a working framework for exploring human-robot attachment: a multidisciplinary review" (2021), Animal Cognition
  • "A New Insight on the Role of the Cerebellum for Executive Functions and Emotion Processing in Adults" (2020), Frontiers in Neurology

Frequent coauthors in their body of work include Jordan Grafman, Shira Cohen-Zimerman, Barry Gordon, Qun Yang, and Gabriele Bellucci. Their research has been published predominantly in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, Cortex, Games, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and Human Brain Mapping, reflecting multidisciplinary interests and collaborations.

In addition to journal articles, Frank Krueger has contributed to book literature, including a publication by Cambridge University Press titled "The Neurobiology of Trust" (2021).

Best Publications

  • Human fronto-mesolimbic networks guide decisions about charitable donation.

    Jorge Moll;Frank Krueger;Roland Zahn;Matteo Pardini

  • Opinion: the neural basis of human moral cognition.

    Jorge Moll;Roland Zahn;Ricardo de Oliveira-Souza;Frank Krueger

  • Social concepts are represented in the superior anterior temporal cortex.

    Roland Zahn;Jorge Moll;Frank Krueger;Edward D. Huey

  • Almost human: Anthropomorphism increases trust resilience in cognitive agents.

    Ewart J. de Visser;Samuel S. Monfort;Ryan McKendrick;Melissa A. B. Smith

  • Kindness Counts: Prompting Prosocial Behavior in Preadolescents Boosts Peer Acceptance and Well-Being

    Kristin Layous;S. Katherine Nelson;Eva Oberle;Kimberly A. Schonert-Reichl

  • An integrative architecture for general intelligence and executive function revealed by lesion mapping.

    Aron K. Barbey;Roberto Colom;Jeffrey Solomon;Frank Krueger

  • Neural correlates of trust

    Frank Krueger;Kevin McCabe;Jorge Moll;Nikolaus Kriegeskorte

  • The Neural Basis of Human Social Values: Evidence from Functional MRI

    Roland Zahn;Jorge Moll;Mirella Paiva;Griselda Garrido

  • Cognitive and neural foundations of religious belief.

    Dimitrios Kapogiannis;Aron K. Barbey;Aron K. Barbey;Michael Su;Giovanna Zamboni

  • Self-Regulation of Amygdala Activation Using Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback

    Vadim Zotev;Frank Krueger;Raquel Phillips;Ruben P. Alvarez

  • Apathy and disinhibition in frontotemporal dementia: Insights into their neural correlates

    Giovanna Zamboni;E. D. Huey;F. Krueger;Paolo Frigio Nichelli

  • Neural signatures of fairness-related normative decision making in the ultimatum game: a coordinate-based meta-analysis.

    Chunliang Feng;Yue-Jia Luo;Yue-Jia Luo;Frank Krueger

  • The medial prefrontal cortex mediates social event knowledge

    Frank Krueger;Aron K. Barbey;Jordan Grafman

  • Interpersonal brain synchronization in the right temporo-parietal junction during face-to-face economic exchange

    Honghong Tang;Xiaoqin Mai;Shun Wang;Shun Wang;Chaozhe Zhu;Chaozhe Zhu

  • Social conceptual impairments in frontotemporal lobar degeneration with right anterior temporal hypometabolism

    Roland Zahn;Jorge Moll;Vijeth Iyengar;Edward D. Huey;Edward D. Huey

  • Oxytocin receptor genetic variation promotes human trust behavior.

    Frank Krueger;Raja Parasuraman;Vijeth Iyengar;Matthew Thornburg

  • "Studying injured minds" - the Vietnam head injury study and 40 years of brain injury research

    Vanessa Raymont;Vanessa Raymont;Andres M. Salazar;Frank Krueger;Jordan H. Grafman;Jordan H. Grafman

  • A Psychological and Neuroanatomical Model of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

    Edward D. Huey;Roland Zahn;Frank Krueger;Jorge Moll

  • Impairment of prosocial sentiments is associated with frontopolar and septal damage in frontotemporal dementia

    Jorge Moll;Roland Zahn;Roland Zahn;Ricardo de Oliveira-Souza;Ivanei E. Bramati

  • The role of the Met66 brain-derived neurotrophic factor allele in the recovery of executive functioning after combat-related traumatic brain injury.

    Frank Krueger;Matteo Pardini;Edward D. Huey;Vanessa Raymont;Vanessa Raymont

Frequent Co-Authors

Jordan Grafman
Jordan Grafman Northwestern University
Barry Gordon
Barry Gordon Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Aron K. Barbey
Aron K. Barbey University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Eric M. Wassermann
Eric M. Wassermann National Institutes of Health
Roland Zahn
Roland Zahn King's College London
Yuejia Luo
Yuejia Luo Shenzhen University
Gopikrishna Deshpande
Gopikrishna Deshpande Auburn University
David Goldman
David Goldman National Institutes of Health
Raja Parasuraman
Raja Parasuraman George Mason University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens up a variety of professional avenues, each with its own education requirements, licensure steps, and skillsets. Many students opt for online degrees in psychology, which can offer flexibility while meeting rigorous accreditation standards.

If you’re interested in helping individuals overcome mental health challenges, consider exploring the path to become a clinical psychologist. For those fascinated by the intersection of psychology and law, online programs can also support your journey through the rigorous forensic psychologist qualifications.

Students drawn to the relationship between brain health and behavior should review resources on how to be a neuropsychologist, which often requires advanced degrees in neuroscience or clinical psychology. Another high-impact career is psychiatry, which asks candidates to master the what skills do you need to be a psychiatrist—including medical training and clinical expertise.

As you evaluate online degrees and potential careers, consider your interests, long-term goals, and the accreditation of each program. Each pathway opens the door to unique challenges and rewarding experiences in the field of psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Frank Krueger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles