World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
34
Citations
12537
World Ranking
10000
National Ranking
5265

Fred Dansereau publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fred Dansereau sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 65 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Fred Dansereau D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fred Dansereau sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2002 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Fred Dansereau is affiliated with the University at Buffalo, State University of New York in the United States. Their work is recognized within the academic community, highlighted by receiving the title of Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2002.

Their research contributions cover a range of topics, although specific fields of study, subfields, publication venues, and co-authors have not been detailed in the available data. Without listings of recent papers or book publications, the precise scope and impact of their academic output remain unspecified here.

Despite limited information on individual publications, the recognition by a prominent professional organization signals engagement with psychological science. This status often reflects a professional standing supported by sustained contributions to research, education, or practice within the discipline.

Fred Dansereau's ongoing association with a major state university indicates a role that may encompass teaching, mentoring, and advancing knowledge in their field. The combination of academic affiliation and professional fellowship highlights involvement in both scholarly and professional communities.

Best Publications

  • A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process

    Fred Dansereau;George Graen;William J. Haga

  • Levels Issues in Theory Development, Data Collection, and Analysis

    Unknown

  • Leadership and levels of analysis: A state-of-the-science review

    Francis J. Yammarino;Shelley D. Dionne;Jae Uk Chun;Fred Dansereau

  • Leadership and Empowerment: A Social Exchange Perspective

    Tiffany Keller;Fred Dansereau

  • Theory testing in organizational behavior : the varient approach

    Fred Dansereau;Joseph A. Alutto;Francis J. Yammarino

  • Multilevel Analytical Techniques: Commonalties, Differences, and Continuing Questions.

    Katherine J. Klein;Paul D. Bliese;Steve W. Kozlowski;Fred Dansereau

  • Are transformational leaders fair? A multi-level study of transformational leadership, justice perceptions, and organizational citizenship behaviors.

    Jeewon Cho;Fred Dansereau

  • Authentic leadership and positive organizational behavior: A meso, multi-level perspective

    Francis J. Yammarino;Shelley D. Dionne;Chester A. Schriesheim;Fred Dansereau

  • INSTRUMENTALITY THEORY AND EQUITY THEORY AS COMPLEMENTARY APPROACHES IN PREDICTING THE RELATIONSHIP OF LEADERSHIP AND TURNOVER AMONG MANAGERS

    Fred Dansereau;James Cashman;George Graen

  • Multiple Levels of Analysis From a Longitudinal Perspective: Some Implications for Theory Building

    Fred Dansereau;Francis J. Yammarino;Jeffrey C. Kohles

  • Individualized leadership: A new multiple-level approach

    Fred Dansereau;Francis J. Yammarino;Steven E. Markham;Joseph A. Alutto

  • Superior-subordinate communication: Multiple levels of analysis.

    Fred Dansereau;Steven E. Markham

  • Leadership: The multiple-level approaches

    Fred Dansereau;Francis J. Yammarino;Steven E. Markham

  • Organizational understructure and leadership: A longitudinal investigation of the managerial role-making process

    James Cashman;Fred Dansereau;George Graen;William J. Haga

  • Dysfunctional leadership styles

    George Graen;Fred Dansereau;Takao Minami

  • What makes leadership, leadership? Using self-expansion theory to integrate traditional and contemporary approaches

    Fred Dansereau;Stephanie R. Seitz;Chia-Yen Chiu;Brooke A. Shaughnessy

  • Multi-level nature of and multi-level approaches to leadership.

    Francis J. Yammarino;Fred Dansereau

  • A dyadic approach to leadership: Creating and nurturing this approach under fire

    Fred Dansereau

  • Viewing leadership through an elephant’s eye

    Francis J Yammarino;Fred Dansereau;Christina J Kennedy

  • Avoiding the “Fallacy of the Wrong Level” A Within and between Analysis (WABA) Approach

    Fred Dansereau;Jeewon Cho;Francis J. Yammarino

  • The many faces of multi-level issues

    Francis J. Yammarino;Fred Dansereau

Frequent Co-Authors

Francis J. Yammarino
Francis J. Yammarino Binghamton University
George B. Graen
George B. Graen University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Chester A. Schriesheim
Chester A. Schriesheim University of Miami

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing the right psychology degree can set the foundation for a wide range of rewarding careers, from clinical counseling to organizational psychology. With many programs now available online, students can access top-ranked degrees wherever they are, balancing education with personal and professional commitments.

When exploring your options, it’s essential to compare the top psychology programs in Grand Rapids and the best psychology degree rankings in Greenville to find programs that match your interests and career ambitions. If you’re considering larger metropolitan areas, reviewing the best psychology degree rankings in Houston could open up additional opportunities and specializations.

Regional differences can also play a role in curriculum focus and internship options. For example, the best psychology degree rankings in the Midwest offer insight into programs that may have strong ties with local healthcare systems and community organizations.

Whichever path you choose, a degree in psychology can lead to roles in research, education, healthcare, or business, and provide lifelong skills in understanding human behavior and mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Fred Dansereau

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles