World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Chester A. Schriesheim

Chester A. Schriesheim

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
60
Citations
22621
World Ranking
3472
National Ranking
1953

Chester A. Schriesheim publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chester A. Schriesheim sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 153 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Chester A. Schriesheim D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chester A. Schriesheim sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Chester A. Schriesheim is affiliated with the University of Miami in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on organizational behavior and human resource management, with particular attention to job satisfaction and organizational behavior topics.

The scientist's recent publications include the following papers:

  • Winter is coming: An investigation of vigilant leadership, antecedents, and outcomes (2024, Journal of Applied Psychology)
  • Vigilant Leadership Measure (2024, PsycTESTS Dataset)

Schriesheim frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including Zhonghua Gao, Yonghong Liu, Chen Zhao, and Yue Fu.

The venues where Schriesheim has published include:

  • Journal of Applied Psychology
  • PsycTESTS Dataset

Their work contributes to understanding leadership vigilance and its impact within organizations, as well as developing measures related to vigilant leadership for use in psychological research.

Best Publications

  • Fairness Perceptions and Trust as Mediators for Transformational and Transactional Leadership: A Two-Sample Study

    Rajnandini Pillai;Chester A. Schriesheim;Eric S. Williams

  • Leader–member exchange (LMX) research: A comprehensive review of theory, measurement, and data-analytic practices.

    Chester A. Schriesheim;Stephanie L. Castro;Claudia C. Cogliser

  • Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: guidelines, issues, and alternatives

    Amy E. Hurley;Terri A. Scandura;Chester A. Schriesheim;Michael T. Brannick

  • Looking forward but learning from our past: Potential challenges to developing authentic leadership theory and authentic leaders

    Cecily D. Cooper;Terri A. Scandura;Chester A. Schriesheim

  • Leader-Member Exchange and Supervisor Career Mentoring as Complementary Constructs in Leadership Research

    Terri A. Scandura;Chester A. Schriesheim

  • Assessing the construct validity of the job descriptive index: a review and meta-analysis.

    Angelo J. Kinicki;Frances M. McKee-Ryan;Chester A. Schriesheim;Kenneth P. Carson

  • Development and application of new scales to measure the French and Raven (1959) bases of social power.

    Timothy R. Hinkin;Chester A. Schriesheim

  • The Authentic Leadership Inventory (ALI): Development and empirical tests

    Linda L. Neider;Chester A. Schriesheim

  • Influence tactics used by subordinates: A theoretical and empirical analysis and refinement of the Kipnis, Schmidt, and Wilkinson subscales.

    Chester A. Schriesheim;Timothy R. Hinkin

  • Field studies of French and Raven's bases of power: Critique, reanalysis, and suggestions for future research.

    Philip M. Podsakoff;Chester A. Schriesheim

  • Toward a Contingency Theory of Leadership Based upon the Consideration and Initiating Structure Literature

    Steven Kerr;Chester A. Schriesheim;Charles J. Murphy;Ralph M. Stogdill

  • Exploring work unit context and leader–member exchange: a multi-level perspective

    Claudia C Cogliser;Chester A Schriesheim

  • Controlling Acquiescence Response Bias by Item Reversals: The Effect on Questionnaire Validity:

    Chester A. Schriesheim;Kenneth D. Hill

  • Delegation and Leader-Member Exchange: Main Effects, Moderators, and Measurement Issues

    Chester A. Schriesheim;Linda L. Neider;Terri A. Scandura

  • Improving Construct Measurement In Management Research: Comments and a Quantitative Approach for Assessing the Theoretical Content Adequacy of Paper-and-Pencil Survey-Type Instruments

    Chester A. Schriesheim;Kathleen J. Powers;Terri A. Scandura;Claudia C. Gardiner

  • Authentic leadership and positive organizational behavior: A meso, multi-level perspective

    Francis J. Yammarino;Shelley D. Dionne;Chester A. Schriesheim;Fred Dansereau

  • An Examination of “Nonleadership”: From Laissez-Faire Leadership to Leader Reward Omission and Punishment Omission

    Timothy R. Hinkin;Chester A. Schriesheim

  • Balance in leader and follower perceptions of leader-member exchange: Relationships with performance and work attitudes

    Claudia C. Cogliser;Chester A. Schriesheim;Terri A. Scandura;William L. Gardner

  • Psychometric properties of the Ohio State leadership scales.

    Chester Schriesheim;Steven Kerr

  • Emerging leadership vistas

    Barbara Kellerman;James G. Hunt;B. Rajaram Baliga;H. Peter Dachler

Frequent Co-Authors

Terri A. Scandura
Terri A. Scandura University of Miami
Timothy R. Hinkin
Timothy R. Hinkin Cornell University
James G. Hunt
James G. Hunt Texas Tech University
Angelo S. DeNisi
Angelo S. DeNisi Tulane University
Bennett J. Tepper
Bennett J. Tepper The Ohio State University
Francis J. Yammarino
Francis J. Yammarino Binghamton University
Angelo J. Kinicki
Angelo J. Kinicki Arizona State University
John Antonakis
John Antonakis University of Lausanne
Philip M. Podsakoff
Philip M. Podsakoff University of Florida
Terence R. Mitchell
Terence R. Mitchell University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree online opens various career opportunities, including counseling, research, human resources, and social services. Many institutions have developed flexible programs that cater to working professionals or students unable to relocate. Accessibility and affordability are two key factors driving the popularity of online psychology degrees.

Choosing the right program matters. If you’re looking in Alabama, you can compare top online psychology degrees in Alabama to find programs that fit your needs. For students considering the Midwest, discover the best online psychology bachelor's program rankings in Illinois or see how schools in Ohio measure up with the best online psychology bachelor's program rankings in Cincinnati.

The professional landscape is also robust in New York, where you can review the best online psychology bachelor's degree rankings in New York to help identify standout options. These resources make it easier to chart your academic journey and move forward into rewarding psychology careers, regardless of your current location.

Best Scientists Citing Chester A. Schriesheim

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles