World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 38 8797 8216 4683 4263 122 7240

Eric Ruthruff publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Eric Ruthruff between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Eric Ruthruff published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 3.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2021. 8 of the 128 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2021. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 4 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 5 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 6 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 4 publications
1992 2025

128 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Eric Ruthruff: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 0
1994 1
1995 4
1996 2
1997 3
1998 3
1999 2
2000 1
2001 5
2002 1
2003 3
2004 2
2005 4
2006 7
2007 3
2008 7
2009 5
2010 6
2011 7
2012 4
2013 5
2014 6
2015 2
2016 1
2017 6
2018 3
2019 3
2020 3
2021 11
2022 4
2023 5
2024 4
2025 4
Total 128
Download as CSV

Eric Ruthruff publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric Ruthruff sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 122 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 122
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Eric Ruthruff D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric Ruthruff sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 38
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Eric Ruthruff is affiliated with the University of New Mexico in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience, with a significant number of publications in cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology. Their work also spans related areas such as general decision sciences, social psychology, and applied psychology.

The scientist's research covers several main topics, including:

  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Motor Control and Adaptation
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

Eric Ruthruff has contributed to a number of peer-reviewed papers published in various journals, such as:

  • "Attentional dwelling and capture by color singletons," 2020, Attention Perception & Psychophysics
  • "On preventing attention capture: Is singleton suppression actually singleton suppression?," 2021, Psychological Research
  • "Oculomotor suppression of abrupt onsets versus color singletons," 2022, Attention Perception & Psychophysics
  • "Are maximizers more normative decision-makers? An experimental investigation of maximizers' susceptibility to cognitive biases," 2021, Personality and Individual Differences
  • "No identification of abrupt onsets that capture attention: evidence against a unified model of spatial attention," 2020, Psychological Research

The scientist frequently publishes in particular venues, with multiple papers appearing in:

  • Attention Perception & Psychophysics
  • Psychological Research
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance
  • Visual Cognition

Collaboration is a significant aspect of their research, with common coauthors including:

  • Mei-Ching Lien
  • Christopher Hauck
  • François Maquestiaux
  • Joshua W. Maxwell
  • Nicholas Gaspelin

Best Publications

  • Forty-five years after Broadbent (1958): still no identification without attention.

    Joel Lachter;Kenneth I. Forster;Eric Ruthruff

  • Processing bottlenecks in dual-task performance: structural limitation or strategic postponement?

    Eric Ruthruff;Harold E. Pashler;Alwin Klaassen

  • Can practice eliminate the psychological refractory period effect

    M. Van Selst;E. Ruthruff;J. C. Johnston

  • The role of input and output modality pairings in dual-task performance: evidence for content-dependent central interference.

    Eliot Hazeltine;Eric Ruthruff;Roger W. Remington

  • How does practice reduce dual-task interference: Integration, automatization, or just stage-shortening?

    Eric Ruthruff;Mark Van Selst;James C. Johnston;Roger Remington

  • Switching between simple cognitive tasks: The interaction of top-down and bottom-up factors

    Eric Ruthruff;Roger W. Remington;James C. Johnston

  • Why practice reduces dual-task interference.

    Eric Ruthruff;James C. Johnston;Mark Van Selst

  • Contingent attentional capture by top-down control settings: converging evidence from event-related potentials.

    Mei-Ching Lien;Eric Ruthruff;Zachary Goodin;Roger W. Remington

  • Vanishing dual-task interference after practice: has the bottleneck been eliminated or is it merely latent?

    Eric Ruthruff;James C. Johnston;Mark Van Selst;Shelly Whitsell

  • Does mental rotation require central mechanisms

    Eric Ruthruff;Jeff Miller;Thomas Lachmann

  • Visual search in complex displays: factors affecting conflict detection by air traffic controllers

    Roger W. Remington;James C. Johnston;Eric Ruthruff;Miri Gold

  • Dual-task interference with equal task emphasis: graded capacity sharing or central postponement?

    Eric Ruthruff;Harold E. Pashler;Eliot Hazeltine

  • Attentional Limitations in Doing Two Tasks at Once The Search for Exceptions

    Mei-Ching Lien;Eric Ruthruff;James C. Johnston

  • Attentional capture with rapidly changing attentional control settings.

    Mei-Ching Lien;Eric Ruthruff;James C. Johnston

  • Attention and Performance

    Harold Pashler;James C. Johnston;Eric Ruthruff

  • On the limits of advance preparation for a task switch: Do people prepare all the task some of the time or some of the task all the time?

    Mei-Ching Lien;Eric Ruthruff;Roger W. Remington;James C. Johnston

  • Bypassing the central bottleneck after single-task practice in the psychological refractory period paradigm: evidence for task automatization and greedy resource recruitment.

    Francois Maquestiaux;Maude Laguë-Beauvais;Eric Ruthruff;Louis Bherer

  • The problem of latent attentional capture: Easy visual search conceals capture by task-irrelevant abrupt onsets.

    Nicholas Gaspelin;Eric Ruthruff;Mei-Ching Lien

  • Visual word recognition without central attention: evidence for greater automaticity with advancing age.

    Mei-Ching Lien;Philip A. Allen;Eric Ruthruff;Jeremy Grabbe

  • Task switching in a hierarchical task structure: evidence for the fragility of the task repetition benefit

    Mei-Ching Lien;Eric Ruthruff

  • What causes residual dual-task interference after practice?

    Eric Ruthruff;Eric Ruthruff;Eliot Hazeltine;Roger W. Remington

Frequent Co-Authors

James C. Johnston
James C. Johnston Ames Research Center
Roger W. Remington
Roger W. Remington University of Minnesota
Philip A. Allen
Philip A. Allen Imperial College London
Harold Pashler
Harold Pashler University of California, San Diego
Eliot Hazeltine
Eliot Hazeltine University of Iowa
Alan A. Hartley
Alan A. Hartley Scripps College
Robert W. Proctor
Robert W. Proctor Purdue University West Lafayette
Jeff Miller
Jeff Miller University of Otago
Geoffrey R. Loftus
Geoffrey R. Loftus University of Washington
Louis Bherer
Louis Bherer University of Montreal

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens up multiple flexible, in-demand online learning options for students. Many institutions now offer applied behavior analysis online degrees, a specialized path for those interested in working with individuals with behavioral challenges or autism spectrum disorders.

For students seeking a faster route to the workforce or a stepping stone to further study, earning a psychology degree 2 years program can offer foundational knowledge and open entry-level opportunities in mental health, human resources, or social work sectors.

If you're aiming for a broader understanding and a wider range of career prospects, a psychology bachelor degree online is a popular choice. This pathway prepares graduates for diverse roles in business, counseling, education, or graduate studies.

Finally, those passionate about behavior change and research may consider the best schools for behavioral psychology with online options that equip students for careers in therapy, program development, or academic research.

Best Scientists Citing Eric Ruthruff

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles