World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
38
Citations
7240
World Ranking
8797
National Ranking
4683

Eric Ruthruff publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric Ruthruff sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 122 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Eric Ruthruff D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric Ruthruff sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eric Ruthruff is affiliated with the University of New Mexico in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience, with a significant number of publications in cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology. Their work also spans related areas such as general decision sciences, social psychology, and applied psychology.

The scientist's research covers several main topics, including:

  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Motor Control and Adaptation
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

Eric Ruthruff has contributed to a number of peer-reviewed papers published in various journals, such as:

  • "Attentional dwelling and capture by color singletons," 2020, Attention Perception & Psychophysics
  • "On preventing attention capture: Is singleton suppression actually singleton suppression?," 2021, Psychological Research
  • "Oculomotor suppression of abrupt onsets versus color singletons," 2022, Attention Perception & Psychophysics
  • "Are maximizers more normative decision-makers? An experimental investigation of maximizers' susceptibility to cognitive biases," 2021, Personality and Individual Differences
  • "No identification of abrupt onsets that capture attention: evidence against a unified model of spatial attention," 2020, Psychological Research

The scientist frequently publishes in particular venues, with multiple papers appearing in:

  • Attention Perception & Psychophysics
  • Psychological Research
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance
  • Visual Cognition

Collaboration is a significant aspect of their research, with common coauthors including:

  • Mei-Ching Lien
  • Christopher Hauck
  • François Maquestiaux
  • Joshua W. Maxwell
  • Nicholas Gaspelin

Best Publications

  • Forty-five years after Broadbent (1958): still no identification without attention.

    Joel Lachter;Kenneth I. Forster;Eric Ruthruff

  • Processing bottlenecks in dual-task performance: structural limitation or strategic postponement?

    Eric Ruthruff;Harold E. Pashler;Alwin Klaassen

  • Can practice eliminate the psychological refractory period effect

    M. Van Selst;E. Ruthruff;J. C. Johnston

  • The role of input and output modality pairings in dual-task performance: evidence for content-dependent central interference.

    Eliot Hazeltine;Eric Ruthruff;Roger W. Remington

  • How does practice reduce dual-task interference: Integration, automatization, or just stage-shortening?

    Eric Ruthruff;Mark Van Selst;James C. Johnston;Roger Remington

  • Switching between simple cognitive tasks: The interaction of top-down and bottom-up factors

    Eric Ruthruff;Roger W. Remington;James C. Johnston

  • Why practice reduces dual-task interference.

    Eric Ruthruff;James C. Johnston;Mark Van Selst

  • Contingent attentional capture by top-down control settings: converging evidence from event-related potentials.

    Mei-Ching Lien;Eric Ruthruff;Zachary Goodin;Roger W. Remington

  • Vanishing dual-task interference after practice: has the bottleneck been eliminated or is it merely latent?

    Eric Ruthruff;James C. Johnston;Mark Van Selst;Shelly Whitsell

  • Does mental rotation require central mechanisms

    Eric Ruthruff;Jeff Miller;Thomas Lachmann

  • Visual search in complex displays: factors affecting conflict detection by air traffic controllers

    Roger W. Remington;James C. Johnston;Eric Ruthruff;Miri Gold

  • Dual-task interference with equal task emphasis: graded capacity sharing or central postponement?

    Eric Ruthruff;Harold E. Pashler;Eliot Hazeltine

  • Attentional Limitations in Doing Two Tasks at Once The Search for Exceptions

    Mei-Ching Lien;Eric Ruthruff;James C. Johnston

  • Attentional capture with rapidly changing attentional control settings.

    Mei-Ching Lien;Eric Ruthruff;James C. Johnston

  • Attention and Performance

    Harold Pashler;James C. Johnston;Eric Ruthruff

  • On the limits of advance preparation for a task switch: Do people prepare all the task some of the time or some of the task all the time?

    Mei-Ching Lien;Eric Ruthruff;Roger W. Remington;James C. Johnston

  • Bypassing the central bottleneck after single-task practice in the psychological refractory period paradigm: evidence for task automatization and greedy resource recruitment.

    Francois Maquestiaux;Maude Laguë-Beauvais;Eric Ruthruff;Louis Bherer

  • The problem of latent attentional capture: Easy visual search conceals capture by task-irrelevant abrupt onsets.

    Nicholas Gaspelin;Eric Ruthruff;Mei-Ching Lien

  • Visual word recognition without central attention: evidence for greater automaticity with advancing age.

    Mei-Ching Lien;Philip A. Allen;Eric Ruthruff;Jeremy Grabbe

  • Task switching in a hierarchical task structure: evidence for the fragility of the task repetition benefit

    Mei-Ching Lien;Eric Ruthruff

  • What causes residual dual-task interference after practice?

    Eric Ruthruff;Eric Ruthruff;Eliot Hazeltine;Roger W. Remington

Frequent Co-Authors

James C. Johnston
James C. Johnston Ames Research Center
Roger W. Remington
Roger W. Remington University of Minnesota
Philip A. Allen
Philip A. Allen Imperial College London
Harold Pashler
Harold Pashler University of California, San Diego
Eliot Hazeltine
Eliot Hazeltine University of Iowa
Alan A. Hartley
Alan A. Hartley Scripps College
Robert W. Proctor
Robert W. Proctor Purdue University West Lafayette
Jeff Miller
Jeff Miller University of Otago
Geoffrey R. Loftus
Geoffrey R. Loftus University of Washington
Louis Bherer
Louis Bherer University of Montreal

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens up multiple flexible, in-demand online learning options for students. Many institutions now offer applied behavior analysis online degrees, a specialized path for those interested in working with individuals with behavioral challenges or autism spectrum disorders.

For students seeking a faster route to the workforce or a stepping stone to further study, earning a psychology degree 2 years program can offer foundational knowledge and open entry-level opportunities in mental health, human resources, or social work sectors.

If you're aiming for a broader understanding and a wider range of career prospects, a psychology bachelor degree online is a popular choice. This pathway prepares graduates for diverse roles in business, counseling, education, or graduate studies.

Finally, those passionate about behavior change and research may consider the best schools for behavioral psychology with online options that equip students for careers in therapy, program development, or academic research.

Best Scientists Citing Eric Ruthruff

Trending Scientists