World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
113
Citations
60907
World Ranking
354
National Ranking
222

Neuroscience

D-Index
113
Citations
60558
World Ranking
479
National Ranking
280

Gordon D. Logan publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gordon D. Logan sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 288 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Gordon D. Logan D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gordon D. Logan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 113 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 2019 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 2016 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences

Overview

Gordon D. Logan is a researcher affiliated with Vanderbilt University in the United States. Their work spans several areas within neuroscience and psychology, with a strong focus on cognitive neuroscience and experimental psychology.

Their recent publications include studies on decision making, memory, and perceptual processes. Among these are the following papers:

  • "Sequential sampling models without random between-trial variability: the racing diffusion model of speeded decision making," 2020, published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • "Serial order in perception, memory, and action," 2020, published in Psychological Review
  • "Severe violations of independence in response inhibition tasks," 2021, published in Science Advances
  • "An integrated theory of deciding and acting," 2021, published in Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • "The episodic flanker effect: Memory retrieval as attention turned inward," 2021, published in Psychological Review

They have frequently collaborated with several scholars, including:

  • Gregory E. Cox
  • Simon D. Lilburn
  • Jana E. Ulrich
  • Mathieu Servant
  • Nathan J. Evans

Their research has been published repeatedly in a number of prominent venues, such as:

  • Psychological Review
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • Attention Perception & Psychophysics
  • Cognitive Psychology

The main fields of study for their work include:

  • Neuroscience

Within neuroscience, they have made significant contributions to the following subfields:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence

The topics most frequently addressed in their research include:

  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Memory Processes and Influences
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Topic Modeling
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Child and Animal Learning Development

Gordon D. Logan has been recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) since 2019 and was also inducted as a Member of the National Academy of Sciences in the same year. Additionally, they have been a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences since 2016.

Best Publications

  • Toward an instance theory of automatization

    Gordon D. Logan

  • On the Ability to Inhibit Thought and Action: A Theory of an Act of Control

    Gordon D. Logan;William B. Cowan

  • On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A users' guide to the stop signal paradigm

    Gordon D. Logan

  • On the ability to inhibit simple and choice reaction time responses: a model and a method

    Gordon D. Logan;William B. Cowan;Kenneth A. Davis

  • Impulsivity and Inhibitory Control

    Gordon D. Logan;Russell J. Schachar;Rosemary Tannock

  • Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm

    Frederick Verbruggen;Gordon D. Logan

  • A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning.

    Unknown

  • Development of Inhibitory Control Across the Life Span

    Benjamin R. Williams;Jonathan S. Ponesse;Russell J. Schachar;Gordon D. Logan

  • Response inhibition in AD/HD, CD, comorbid AD/HD + CD, anxious, and control children: A meta-analysis of studies with the stop task.

    Jaap Oosterlaan;Gordon D. Logan;Joseph A. Sergeant

  • Aging and Inhibition: Beyond a Unitary View of Inhibitory Processing in Attention

    Arthur F. Kramer;Darryl G. Humphrey;John E Larish;Gordon D. Logan

  • Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations.

    Gordon D. Logan;Robert D. Gordon

  • A consensus guide to capturing the ability to inhibit actions and impulsive behaviors in the stop-signal task

    Frederick Verbruggen;Adam R. Aron;Guido Ph Band;Christian Beste

  • Horse-race model simulations of the stop-signal procedure

    Guido P.H. Band;Maurits W. van der Molen;Gordon D. Logan

  • Models of response inhibition in the stop-signal and stop-change paradigms

    Frederick Verbruggen;Gordon D. Logan

  • The Ecological Validity of Delay Aversion and Response Inhibition as Measures of Impulsivity in AD/HD: A Supplement to the NIMH Multimodal Treatment Study of AD/HD

    Mary V. Solanto;Howard Abikoff;Howard Abikoff;Edmund Sonuga-Barke;Russell Schachar

  • Repetition priming and automaticity: Common underlying mechanisms? ☆

    Gordon D Logan

  • When it helps to be misled: Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task

    Gordon D. Logan;N. Jane Zbrodoff

  • Impulsivity and Inhibitory Control in Normal Development and Childhood Psychopathology

    Russell Schachar;Gordon D. Logan

  • Automatic and Controlled Response Inhibition: Associative Learning in the Go/No-Go and Stop-Signal Paradigms

    Frederick Verbruggen;Gordon D. Logan

  • Converging evidence for a fronto-basal-ganglia network for inhibitory control of action and cognition.

    Adam R. Aron;Sarah Durston;Dawn M. Eagle;Gordon D. Logan

  • Attention and automaticity in Stroop and priming tasks: theory and data.

    Gordon D Logan

  • On the ability to inhibit thought and action: general and special theories of an act of control.

    Gordon D. Logan;Trisha Van Zandt;Frederick Verbruggen;Eric-Jan Wagenmakers

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffrey D. Schall
Jeffrey D. Schall Vanderbilt University
Thomas J. Palmeri
Thomas J. Palmeri Vanderbilt University
Russell Schachar
Russell Schachar University of Toronto
Frederick Verbruggen
Frederick Verbruggen Ghent University
Rosemary Tannock
Rosemary Tannock University of Toronto
Russell A. Poldrack
Russell A. Poldrack Stanford University
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers University of Amsterdam
Andrew Heathcote
Andrew Heathcote University of Newcastle Australia
Christopher D. Chambers
Christopher D. Chambers Cardiff University
Claus Bundesen
Claus Bundesen University of Copenhagen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees can open doors to diverse career pathways in the mental health field. Many students choose to specialize and pursue licensure as a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), a popular route for those interested in supporting couples and families. The journey to becoming an MFT often depends on specific state requirements. For example, the Tulsa mft certification requirements highlight the importance of completing a master's degree, gaining supervised experience, and passing state licensing exams.

Likewise, if you're considering practicing in Virginia, you'll want to familiarize yourself with the how to become a marriage and family therapist in Virginia Beach guidelines, which detail required educational credentials and clinical hours. Other regions, such as Washington, D.C., outline their own Washington DC mft education requirements, including coursework and supervised practice.

If you’re looking to practice in Kansas, reviewing the Wichita mft education requirements will help you understand the steps for local licensure. No matter where you start, online psychology degrees can help lay the foundation for advancing your career in mental health services across the U.S.

Best Scientists Citing Gordon D. Logan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles