World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
39
Citations
9209
World Ranking
8434
National Ranking
4509

Neuroscience

D-Index
39
Citations
9213
World Ranking
8237
National Ranking
3534

Eliot Hazeltine publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eliot Hazeltine sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 121 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Eliot Hazeltine D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eliot Hazeltine sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eliot Hazeltine is affiliated with the University of Iowa in the United States. Their research spans primarily the fields of Neuroscience and Psychology, with a focus on cognitive processes and brain function. The main research areas include Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, General Decision Sciences, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The topics covered in Eliot Hazeltine's work emphasize Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, Neural dynamics and brain function, Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics, Motor Control and Adaptation, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, and Action Observation and Synchronization.

Frequent publication venues for their research include Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, Attention Perception & Psychophysics, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Journal of Experimental Psychology General, and Journal of Cognition.

Among the recent papers authored or coauthored by Eliot Hazeltine are the following:

  • Lingering Neural Representations of Past Task Features Adversely Affect Future Behavior, 2022, Journal of Neuroscience
  • Cue the effects: Stimulus-action effect modality compatibility and dual-task costs., 2020, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance
  • Crosstalk, not resource competition, as a source of dual-task costs: Evidence from manipulating stimulus-action effect conceptual compatibility, 2021, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Interference and integration in hierarchical task learning., 2022, Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • Automaticity as an independent trait in predicting reading outcomes in middle-school., 2021, Developmental Psychology

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Eliot Hazeltine include Jonathan Schacherer, Tobin Dykstra, Eric H. Schumacher, Jiefeng Jiang, and Daniel H. Weissman.

Best Publications

  • Functional mapping of sequence learning in normal humans

    Scott T. Grafton;Eliot Hazeltine;Richard Ivry

  • The cognitive and neural architecture of sequence representation.

    Steven W. Keele;Richard Ivry;Ulrich Mayr;Eliot Hazeltine

  • Dissociable contributions of prefrontal and parietal cortices to response selection.

    Silvia A. Bunge;Eliot Hazeltine;Michael D. Scanlon;Allyson C. Rosen

  • Attention and stimulus characteristics determine the locus of motor–sequence encoding a PET study.

    Eliot Hazeltine;Scott T. Grafton;Richard Ivry

  • Motor sequence learning with the nondominant left hand. A PET functional imaging study.

    Scott T. Grafton;Eliot Hazeltine;Richard B. Ivry

  • Abstract and effector-specific representations of motor sequences identified with PET

    Scott T. Grafton;Eliot Hazeltine;Richard B. Ivry

  • Mental spatial transformations of objects and perspective

    Jeffrey M. Zacks;Jon Mires;Barbara Tversky;Eliot Hazeltine

  • Neural fate of seen and unseen faces in visuospatial neglect: A combined event-related functional MRI and event-related potential study

    Patrik Vuilleumier;Noam Sagiv;Noam Sagiv;Noam Sagiv;Eliot Hazeltine;Russell A Poldrack;Russell A Poldrack

  • Neural Activation During Response Competition

    Eliot Hazeltine;Russell Poldrack;John D. E. Gabrieli

  • Callosotomy patients exhibit temporal uncoupling during continuous bimanual movements.

    Steven W. Kennerley;Jörn Diedrichsen;Eliot Hazeltine;Andras Semjen

  • Simultaneous dual-task performance reveals parallel response selection after practice.

    Eliot Hazeltine;Donald Teague;Richard B. Ivry

  • The role of input and output modality pairings in dual-task performance: evidence for content-dependent central interference.

    Eliot Hazeltine;Eric Ruthruff;Roger W. Remington

  • Moving to Directly Cued Locations Abolishes Spatial Interference During Bimanual Actions

    Jörn Diedrichsen;Eliot Hazeltine;Steven Kennerley;Richard B. Ivry

  • Task switching and multitask performance.

    Harold Pashler;Pierre Jolicœur;Roberto Dell'Acqua;Jacquelyn Crebolder

  • Changes in regional activity are accompanied with changes in inter-regional connectivity during 4 weeks motor learning.

    Liangsuo Ma;Liangsuo Ma;Binquan Wang;Shalini Narayana;Eliot Hazeltine

  • The boundaries of sequential modulations: evidence for set-level control.

    Eliot Hazeltine;Erin Lightman;Hillary Schwarb;Eric H. Schumacher

  • Material-dependent and material-independent selection processes in the frontal and parietal lobes: an event-related fMRI investigation of response competition.

    Eliot Hazeltine;Silvia A. Bunge;Michael D. Scanlon;John D.E. Gabrieli

  • Dual-task interference with equal task emphasis: graded capacity sharing or central postponement?

    Eric Ruthruff;Harold E. Pashler;Eliot Hazeltine

  • Neural mechanisms of timing.

    Eliot Hazeltine;Laura L. Helmuth;Richard B. Ivry

  • A Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective on Bimanual Coordination and Interference

    Richard Ivry;Jörn Diedrichsen;Rebecca Spencer;Eliot Hazeltine

  • Conflict monitoring and feature overlap: two sources of sequential modulations.

    Çağlar Akçay;Eliot Hazeltine

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard B. Ivry
Richard B. Ivry University of California, Berkeley
Jörn Diedrichsen
Jörn Diedrichsen University of Western Ontario
Bob McMurray
Bob McMurray University of Iowa
Eric H. Schumacher
Eric H. Schumacher Georgia Institute of Technology
Michelle W. Voss
Michelle W. Voss University of Iowa
Vincent A. Magnotta
Vincent A. Magnotta University of Iowa
Scott T. Grafton
Scott T. Grafton University of California, Santa Barbara
John P. Spencer
John P. Spencer University of East Anglia
Eric Ruthruff
Eric Ruthruff University of New Mexico

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Neuroscience is a dynamic and evolving field offering diverse career options. Many students now explore flexible pathways through online learning, making higher education more accessible and affordable than ever before. If you’re seeking specialized credentials, consider exploring what certificates can I get online. These certificates can help you develop marketable skills to complement your scientific background.

For those aiming to earn a degree, there are a range of online college degrees that suit various interests and career objectives. Looking for career paths that blend neuroscience with helping professions? Affordable online MSW programs affordable provide training in social work, a field closely linked to behavioral health and human development.

Additionally, those interested in behavioral neuroscience may consider the cheapest BCBA online program. Certified Behavior Analysts support individuals with behavioral and developmental challenges—a rewarding career with growing demand. Whether you seek direct neuroscience roles or related fields, online education offers multiple pathways to success.

Best Scientists Citing Eliot Hazeltine

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles