World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
36
Citations
8937
World Ranking
9352
National Ranking
4947

Eric H. Schumacher publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric H. Schumacher sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 66 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Eric H. Schumacher D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric H. Schumacher sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eric H. Schumacher is affiliated with the Georgia Institute of Technology in the United States. Their research focuses predominantly on neuroscience, with substantial contributions to cognitive neuroscience alongside subfields including developmental and educational psychology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, experimental and cognitive psychology, and general decision sciences.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, prominently including functional brain connectivity studies and neural dynamics and brain function. Other key areas of investigation encompass EEG and brain-computer interfaces, neural and behavioral psychology studies, sleep and wakefulness research, advanced MRI techniques and applications, as well as behavioral and psychological studies.

Eric H. Schumacher has published extensively, with a significant number of papers appearing in bioRxiv published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. Other publication venues for their work include Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, Imaging Neuroscience, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, and Consciousness and Cognition.

Recent papers illustrate the scope and focus of their research:

  • "Time-varying functional connectivity predicts fluctuations in sustained attention in a serial tapping task" (2024) published in Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience
  • "The interaction between random and systematic visual stimulation and infraslow quasi-periodic spatiotemporal patterns of whole-brain activity" (2023) published in Imaging Neuroscience
  • "Measuring task structure with transitional response times: Task representations are more than task sets" (2022) published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • "Beyond mind wandering: Performance variability and neural activity during off-task thought and other attention lapses" (2023) published in Consciousness and Cognition
  • "Cognitive flexibility in and out of the laboratory: task switching, sustained attention, and mind wandering" (2024) published in Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences

They have collaborated frequently with several researchers throughout their career, including Shella Keilholz, Nan Xu, Derek M. Smith, Dolly T. Seeburger, and Eliot Hazeltine. These collaborations have contributed to a diverse and interdisciplinary approach within their published works.

Best Publications

  • Dissociation of Storage and Rehearsal in Verbal Working Memory: Evidence From Positron Emission Tomography

    Edward Awh;John Jonides;Edward E. Smith;Eric H. Schumacher

  • Verbal working memory load affects regional brain activation as measured by pet

    John Jonides;Eric H. Schumacher;Edward E. Smith;Erick J. Lauber

  • Spatial versus object working memory: Pet investigations

    Edward E. Smith;John Jonides;Robert A. Koeppe;Edward Awh

  • The Role of Parietal Cortex in Verbal Working Memory

    John Jonides;Eric H. Schumacher;Edward E. Smith;Robert A. Koeppe

  • Virtually Perfect Time Sharing in Dual-Task Performance: Uncorking the Central Cognitive Bottleneck

    Eric H. Schumacher;Travis L. Seymour;Jennifer M. Glass;David E. Fencsik

  • Audience preferences are predicted by temporal reliability of neural processing.

    Jacek P. Dmochowski;Jacek P. Dmochowski;Matthew A. Bezdek;Brian P. Abelson;John S. Johnson

  • PET Evidence for an Amodal Verbal Working Memory System

    Eric H. Schumacher;Erick Lauber;Edward Awh;John Jonides

  • Spatiotemporal dynamics of low frequency BOLD fluctuations in rats and humans

    Waqas Majeed;Matthew Magnuson;Wendy Hasenkamp;Hillary D. Schwarb

  • Short-time windows of correlation between large-scale functional brain networks predict vigilance intraindividually and interindividually.

    Garth John Thompson;Matthew Evan Magnuson;Michael Donelyn Merritt;Hillary Schwarb

  • A functional MRI study of the influence of practice on component processes of working memory.

    Susan M Landau;Eric H Schumacher;Hugh Garavan;T.Jason Druzgal;T.Jason Druzgal

  • Concurrent response-selection processes in dual-task performance: Evidence for adaptive executive control of task scheduling.

    Eric H. Schumacher;Erick J. Lauber;Jennifer M. Glass;Eileen L. Zurbriggen

  • Neural Evidence for Representation-Specific Response Selection

    Eric H. Schumacher;Puni A. Elston;Mark D'esposito

  • The boundaries of sequential modulations: evidence for set-level control.

    Eliot Hazeltine;Erin Lightman;Hillary Schwarb;Eric H. Schumacher

  • Adaptive executive control: Flexible multiple-task performance without pervasive immutable response-selection bottlenecks

    David E. Meyer;David E. Kieras;Erick Lauber;Eric H. Schumacher

  • The neural effect of stimulus-response modality compatibility on dual-task performance: an fMRI study

    Christine Stelzel;Eric H Schumacher;Torsten Schubert;Mark D'Esposito

  • Aging and the psychological refractory period: task-coordination strategies in young and old adults.

    Jennifer M. Glass;Eric H. Schumacher;Erick J. Lauber;Eileen L. Zurbriggen

  • Neural evidence that suspense narrows attentional focus

    M.A. Bezdek;R.J. Gerrig;W.G. Wenzel;J. Shin

  • Generalized lessons about sequence learning from the study of the serial reaction time task.

    Hillary Schwarb;Eric H Schumacher

  • Reorganization of visual processing is related to eccentric viewing in patients with macular degeneration.

    Eric H. Schumacher;Julie A. Jacko;Susan A. Primo;Keith L. Main

  • Neural implementation of response selection in humans as revealed by localized effects of stimulus-response compatibility on brain activation.

    Eric H. Schumacher;Eric H. Schumacher;Mark D'Esposito

Frequent Co-Authors

Eliot Hazeltine
Eliot Hazeltine University of Iowa
Mark D'Esposito
Mark D'Esposito University of California, Berkeley
Edward Awh
Edward Awh University of Chicago
Edward E. Smith
Edward E. Smith Columbia University
John Jonides
John Jonides University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jennifer M. Glass
Jennifer M. Glass University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Robert A. Koeppe
Robert A. Koeppe University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
David E. Meyer
David E. Meyer University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
David E. Kieras
David E. Kieras University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Gary W. Evans
Gary W. Evans Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring an online psychology degree opens up diverse career pathways, including specialized roles in behavior analysis, counseling, and educational psychology. A popular career trajectory is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). Professionals interested in becoming a bcba in Philadelphia must complete graduate-level coursework, supervised practical experience, and pass the BCBA examination.

BCBA requirements can vary by city and state. For those curious about how to become a bcba in Phoenix, the process includes fulfilling specific educational requirements and obtaining relevant fieldwork hours. Meanwhile, learning about Pittsburgh bcba requirements will help aspiring professionals understand local licensing and certification standards.

Understanding regional expectations is crucial, such as meeting the Plano bcba education requirements. Many accredited universities now offer flexible online programs tailored for working students. Whether you’re starting your academic journey or seeking advanced certification, online study can help you enter growing fields like applied behavior analysis and clinical psychology while meeting the requirements of your preferred location.

Best Scientists Citing Eric H. Schumacher

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles