World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
56
Citations
11996
World Ranking
4221
National Ranking
202

Bruno Verschuere publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruno Verschuere sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 227 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Bruno Verschuere D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruno Verschuere sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bruno Verschuere is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research spans primarily across the field of psychology, with a focus on social psychology, cognitive neuroscience, clinical psychology, artificial intelligence, and sociology and political science.

The scientist's work addresses various topics, particularly in the areas of deception detection and forensic psychology, psychopathy, forensic psychiatry, sexual offending, memory processes and influences, adversarial robustness in machine learning, misinformation and its impacts, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, and social and intergroup psychology.

Among recent publications attributed to or connected with their research interests are:

  • "Discriminating deceptive from truthful statements using the verifiability approach: A meta-analysis" (2020), Applied Cognitive Psychology
  • "Tears evoke the intention to offer social support: A systematic investigation of the interpersonal effects of emotional crying across 41 countries" (2021), Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
  • "Raising the value of research studies in psychological science by increasing the credibility of research reports: the transparent Psi project" (2023), Royal Society Open Science
  • "The use-the-best heuristic facilitates deception detection" (2023), Nature Human Behaviour
  • "Does Honesty Require Time? Two Preregistered Direct Replications of Experiment 2 of Shalvi, Eldar, and Bereby-Meyer (2012)" (2020), Psychological Science

Verschuere frequently collaborates with a number of researchers. Among their frequent co-authors are:

  • Gershon Ben-Shakhar
  • Ewout H. Meijer
  • Yoni Pertzov
  • Sera Wiechert
  • Ine Van der Cruyssen

Their work has appeared across various publication venues, including:

  • Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
  • Legal and Criminological Psychology
  • Applied Cognitive Psychology
  • Applied police briefings
  • Memory

Best Publications

  • Selective attention to threat in the dot probe paradigm: differentiating vigilance and difficulty to disengage

    Ernst H.W. Koster;Geert Crombez;Bruno Verschuere;Jan De Houwer

  • The Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces: A validation study

    Ellen Goeleven;Rudi De Raedt;Lemke Leyman;Bruno Verschuere

  • A review of current evidence for the causal impact of attentional bias on fear and anxiety

    Bram Van Bockstaele;Bruno Verschuere;Helen Tibboel;Jan De Houwer

  • Components of attentional bias to threat in high trait anxiety: Facilitated engagement, impaired disengagement, and attentional avoidance.

    Ernst H.W. Koster;Geert Crombez;Bruno Verschuere;Stefaan Van Damme

  • Does Imminent Threat Capture and Hold Attention

    Ernst H. W. Koster;Geert Crombez;Stefaan Van Damme;Bruno Verschuere

  • Time-course of attention for threatening pictures in high and low trait anxiety.

    Ernst H.W. Koster;Bruno Verschuere;Geert Crombez;Stefaan Van Damme

  • Memory detection: theory and application of the concealed information test

    Bruno Verschuere;Gershon Ben-Shakhar;Ewout H Meijer

  • Lying takes time: A meta-analysis on reaction time measures of deception.

    Kristina Suchotzki;Bruno Verschuere;Bram Van Bockstaele;Gershon Ben-Shakhar

  • Attention to Threat in Anxiety-prone Individuals: Mechanisms Underlying Attentional Bias

    Ernst H. W. Koster;Geert Crombez;Bruno Verschuere;Jan De Houwer

  • Being Honest About Dishonesty: Correlating Self-Reports and Actual Lying

    Rony Halevy;Shaul Shalvi;Bruno Verschuere

  • Autonomic and behavioral responding to concealed information: Differentiating orienting and defensive responses

    Bruno Verschuere;Geert Crombez;Armand De Clercq;Ernst H. W. Koster

  • Detecting Deception : Current Challenges and Cognitive Approaches

    Pär Anders Granhag;Aldert Vrij;Bruno Verschuere

  • From junior to senior Pinocchio: A cross-sectional lifespan investigation of deception

    Evelyne Debey;Maarten De Schryver;Gordon D. Logan;Kristina Suchotzki

  • The ease of lying.

    Bruno Verschuere;Adriaan Spruyt;Ewout H. Meijer;Henry Otgaar

  • The Validity of the Psychopathic Personality Inventory—Revised in a Community Sample

    Katarzyna Uzieblo;Bruno Verschuere;Eva Van den Bussche;Geert Crombez

  • What features of psychopathy might be central? A network analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) in three large samples.

    Bruno Verschuere;Sophia van Ghesel Grothe;Lourens Waldorp;Ashley L. Watts

  • Registered replication report on Mazar, Amir, and Ariely (2008)

    Bruno Verschuere;Ewout H. Meijer;Ariane Jim;Katherine Hoogesteyn

  • Deception detection with behavioral, autonomic, and neural measures: Conceptual and methodological considerations that warrant modesty.

    Ewout H. Meijer;Bruno Verschuere;Matthias Gamer;Harald Merckelbach

  • Cheating the Lie Detector Faking in the Autobiographical Implicit Association Test

    Bruno Verschuere;Valentina Prati;Jan De Houwer

  • Lying and executive control: an experimental investigation using ego depletion and goal neglect

    Evelyne Debey;Bruno Verschuere;Bruno Verschuere;Bruno Verschuere;Geert Crombez

  • Signals for threat modulate attentional capture and holding: Fear-conditioning and extinction during the exogenous cueing task

    Emst H. W. Koster;Geert Crombez;Stefaan Van Damme;Bruno Verschuere

Frequent Co-Authors

Geert Crombez
Geert Crombez Ghent University
Gershon Ben-Shakhar
Gershon Ben-Shakhar Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Ernst H. W. Koster
Ernst H. W. Koster Ghent University
Jan De Houwer
Jan De Houwer Ghent University
Harald Merckelbach
Harald Merckelbach Maastricht University
Arnoud Arntz
Arnoud Arntz University of Amsterdam
Merel Kindt
Merel Kindt University of Amsterdam
Matthias Gamer
Matthias Gamer University of Würzburg
Aldert Vrij
Aldert Vrij University of Portsmouth
Shaul Shalvi
Shaul Shalvi University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens diverse career pathways, especially in specialized fields like Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA). A popular route is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), which requires a blend of advanced education, supervised fieldwork, and passing a national exam. While the core process is consistent, each state and city may add unique requirements.

For aspiring professionals in Arizona, understanding the Phoenix bcba requirements is essential, as they detail the local steps needed to become certified. Similarly, those interested in working in Pennsylvania should review the bcba certification requirements in Pittsburgh.

Texas-based students can explore the process for becoming a bcba in Plano to understand specific educational and practical experience expectations. In Florida, the Port St. Lucie bcba education requirements provide an overview of both coursework and local regulations.

Researching local and online programs ensures you meet regional requirements and are prepared for successful certification and rewarding careers in the field of psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Bruno Verschuere

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles