World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
44
Citations
6674
World Ranking
7034
National Ranking
3799

J. Peter Rosenfeld publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Peter Rosenfeld sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 170 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

J. Peter Rosenfeld D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Peter Rosenfeld sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

J. Peter Rosenfeld was affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States. Their work primarily contributed to the fields of psychology, neuroscience, and computer science, with a focus on social psychology, cognitive neuroscience, artificial intelligence, and statistics related to uncertainty and probability.

Their research spanned several key topics including deception detection and forensic psychology, adversarial robustness in machine learning, memory processes and influences, statistical methods in clinical trials, meta-analysis and systematic reviews, Bayesian modeling and causal inference, as well as psychopathy, forensic psychiatry, and sexual offending.

Rosenfeld's recent publications included:

  • Bayesian Data Analysis: A Fresh Approach to Power Issues and Null Hypothesis Interpretation (2021) in Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
  • Familiarity-related filler items enhance the RT CIT, but not the P300 CIT: Episodic vs. Semantic memory protocols (2020) in International Journal of Psychophysiology
  • Feedback does not influence the recognition-related P300 in a novel concealed information test while feedback-evoked P300 shows promising diagnostic accuracy (2020) in International Journal of Psychophysiology
  • The effects of practicing a novel countermeasure on both the semantic and episodic memory-based complex trial protocols (2022) in International Journal of Psychophysiology
  • Necessity of the target discrimination in the P300-based complex trial protocol test for concealed information (2020) in Psychophysiology

Frequent publication venues included:

  • International Journal of Psychophysiology
  • Psychophysiology
  • Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
  • CHERKASY UNIVERSITY BULLETIN BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES SERIES
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Among their frequent coauthors were Joseph M. Olson, Anne Ward, E. K. Davydova, Elena Labkovsky, and Evan Sitar.

Best Publications

  • Frontal EEG Alpha Asymmetry, Depression, and Cognitive Functioning

    Ian H. Gotlib;Charan Ranganath;J. Peter Rosenfeld

  • Simple, effective countermeasures to P300-based tests of detection of concealed information

    J.Peter Rosenfeld;Matthew Soskins;Gregory Bosh;Andrew Ryan

  • A Modified, Event-Related Potential-Based Guilty Knowledge Test

    J. Peter Rosenfeld;Bradley Cantwell;Victoria Tepe Nasman;Valerie Wojdac

  • The Complex Trial Protocol (CTP): A new, countermeasure-resistant, accurate, P300-based method for detection of concealed information

    J. Peter Rosenfeld;Elena Labkovsky;Michael Winograd;Ming A. Lui

  • Lying in the scanner: covert countermeasures disrupt deception detection by functional magnetic resonance imaging.

    Giorgio Ganis;J. Peter Rosenfeld;John Meixner;Rogier A. Kievit

  • An ERP-based, control-question lie detector analog: algorithms for discriminating effects within individuals' average waveforms.

    J. P. Rosenfeld;A. Angell;M. Johnson;Jia-He Qian

  • P300-based detection of concealed autobiographical versus incidentally acquired information in target and non-target paradigms.

    J. Peter Rosenfeld;Julianne R. Biroschak;John J. Furedy

  • The Clinical Use of An Alpha Asymmetry Protocol in the Neurofeedback Treatment of Depression: Two Case Studies

    E. Baehr;Joel P Rosenfeld;R. Baehr

  • Clinical use of an alpha asymmetry neurofeedback protocol in the treatment of mood disorders: Follow-up study one to five years post therapy

    Elsa Baehr;J. Peter Rosenfeld;Rufus Baehr

  • Review of recent studies and issues regarding the P300-based complex trial protocol for detection of concealed information

    J. Peter Rosenfeld;Xiaoqing Hu;Elena Labkovsky;John Meixner

  • A mock terrorism application of the P300-based concealed information test.

    John B. Meixner;J. Peter Rosenfeld

  • Peak-to-peak measurement of P300 recorded at 0.3 Hz high pass filter settings in intraindividual diagnosis: Complex vs. simple paradigms

    Matthew Soskins;J. Peter Rosenfeld;Tara A Niendam

  • Further investigation of traumatic brain injury versus insufficient effort with the California Verbal Learning Test.

    Jerry J. Sweet;Penny Wolfe;Elizabeth Sattlberger;Bobbi Numan

  • P300 in Detecting Concealed Information

    J. Peter Rosenfeld

  • Comparison of two EEG asymmetry indices in depressed patients vs. normal controls

    Elsa Baehr;J Peter Rosenfeld;Rufus Baehr;Carolyn Earnest

  • An EEG Biofeedback Protocol for Affective Disorders

    J. Peter Rosenfeld

  • Operant (biofeedback) control of left-right frontal alpha power differences: potential neurotherapy for affective disorders.

    Joel P Rosenfeld;Grace Cha;Tad Blair;Ian H. Gotlib

  • Detecting simulated amnesia for autobiographical and recently learned information using the P300 event-related potential.

    Joel Ellwanger;J.Peter Rosenfeld;Jerry J. Sweet;Maneesha Bhatt

  • P300 scalp amplitude distribution as an index of deception in a simulated cognitive deficit model

    J. P. Rosenfeld;J. W. Ellwanger;K. Nolan;S. Wu

  • Oddball-evoked P300-based method of deception detection in the laboratory. II: Utilization of non-selective activation of relevant knowledge.

    Mary Margaret Johnson;J.Peter Rosenfeld

  • Preliminary evidence that daily changes in frontal alpha asymmetry correlate with changes in affect in therapy sessions.

    J.Peter Rosenfeld;Elsa Baehr;Rufus Baehr;Ian H. Gotlib

Frequent Co-Authors

Jerry J. Sweet
Jerry J. Sweet NorthShore University HealthSystem
Giorgio Ganis
Giorgio Ganis Plymouth University
Ian H. Gotlib
Ian H. Gotlib Stanford University
Rogier A. Kievit
Rogier A. Kievit Donders Institute
Galen V. Bodenhausen
Galen V. Bodenhausen Northwestern University
Bruno Verschuere
Bruno Verschuere University of Amsterdam
Niels Birbaumer
Niels Birbaumer University of Tübingen
Thomas Elbert
Thomas Elbert University of Konstanz
John J. Furedy
John J. Furedy University of Toronto
Emanuel Donchin
Emanuel Donchin University of South Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology often leads students to consider professional licensure and specialized degrees. Many online psychology programs offer flexible pathways to related roles, such as Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC). Requirements for LPC licensure can vary widely across states, so it’s essential to understand the standards where you intend to practice.

For instance, lpc license requirements in Illinois include a graduate degree in counseling, supervised clinical experience, and passing the National Counselor Examination. Similarly, you can review lpc licensure requirements in Indiana to understand additional state-specific demands for education and supervised hours.

Those looking to qualify in Iowa should examine the Iowa licensed professional counselor requirements, which detail core coursework and practicum components. In Kansas, aspiring counselors should consult the lpc license requirements in Kansas for information about exam policies and approved graduate programs.

Researching these regulations helps students choose the right online degree and plan successful career pathways in counseling and psychology.

Best Scientists Citing J. Peter Rosenfeld

Recently Published Articles