World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
48
Citations
16380
World Ranking
5804
National Ranking
3142

James A. Coan publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James A. Coan sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 98 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

James A. Coan D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James A. Coan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

James A. Coan is affiliated with the University of Virginia in the United States. Their research is primarily situated within the field of psychology, with a focus on social psychology, psychiatry and mental health, clinical psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and experimental and cognitive psychology. The most frequent topics in their work include neuroendocrine regulation and behavior, attachment and relationship dynamics, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, death anxiety and social exclusion, psychosomatic disorders and their treatments, as well as anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, and cognitive processes.

Their recent papers cover a range of themes relating to interpersonal closeness, group dynamics, emotion emergence, developmental neural sensitivity, and social presence, published between 2020 and 2023. The notable publications include:

  • Partner intimate touch is associated with increased interpersonal closeness, especially in non-romantic partners (2021, PLoS ONE)
  • Groups as organisms: Implications for therapy and training (2021, Clinical Psychology Review)
  • Beyond Nature Versus Nurture: the Emergence of Emotion (2023, Affective Science)
  • OXTR DNA methylation moderates the developmental calibration of neural reward sensitivity (2020, Developmental Psychobiology)
  • Yielding to social presence as a bioenergetic strategy: Preliminary evidence using fMRI (2021, Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology)

Coan frequently collaborates with several co-authors including Joseph P. Allen, Jingrun Lin, Sara Medina-DeVilliers, Marlen Z. Gonzalez, and Steven M. Boker.

Their publications are often found in the following venues:

  • Social Neuroscience
  • PLoS ONE
  • Clinical Psychology Review
  • Affective Science
  • Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology

Best Publications

  • Predicting Marital Happiness and Stability from Newlywed Interactions

    John M. Gottman;James Coan;Sybil Carrere;Catherine Swanson

  • Frontal EEG asymmetry as a moderator and mediator of emotion.

    James A Coan;John J.B Allen

  • Lending a Hand Social Regulation of the Neural Response to Threat

    James A. Coan;Hillary S. Schaefer;Richard J. Davidson

  • The handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment

    James A. Coan;John J. B. Allen

  • Frontal EEG asymmetry and the behavioral activation and inhibition systems.

    James A. Coan;John J. B. Allen

  • Issues and assumptions on the road from raw signals to metrics of frontal EEG asymmetry in emotion

    John J.B. Allen;James A. Coan;Maria Nazarian

  • Social Baseline Theory: The Role of Social Proximity in Emotion and Economy of Action

    Lane Beckes;James A. Coan

  • The stability of resting frontal electroencephalographic asymmetry in depression.

    John J. B. Allen;Heather L. Urry;Sabrina K. Hitt;James A. Coan

  • A capability model of individual differences in frontal EEG asymmetry

    James A. Coan;John J.B. Allen;Patrick E. McKnight

  • Toward a neuroscience of attachment.

    James A. Coan

  • Predicting marital stability and divorce in newlywed couples.

    Sybil Carrère;Kim T. Buehlman;John M. Gottman;James A. Coan

  • Voluntary facial expression and hemispheric asymmetry over the frontal cortex.

    James A. Coan;John J.B. Allen;Eddie Harmon-Jones

  • Social Baseline Theory: the social regulation of risk and effort

    James A Coan;David A Sbarra

  • Resting frontal EEG asymmetry as an endophenotype for depression risk: sex-specific patterns of frontal brain asymmetry.

    Jennifer L. Stewart;Andrew W. Bismark;David N. Towers;James A. Coan

  • Viewing cute images increases behavioral carefulness.

    Gary D. Sherman;Jonathan Haidt;James A. Coan

  • A Theory of Social Thermoregulation in Human Primates

    Hans IJzerman;James A. Coan;Fieke M. A. Wagemans;Marjolein A. Missler

  • The state and trait nature of frontal EEG asymmetry in emotion.

    James A. Coan;John J. B. Allen

  • The Specific Affect Coding System (SPAFF).

    James A. Coan;John M. Gottman

  • Adult attachment and the brain

    James A. Coan

  • Empathy Is Associated With Dynamic Change in Prefrontal Brain Electrical Activity During Positive Emotion in Children

    Sharee N. Light;James A. Coan;Carolyn Zahn-Waxler;Corrina Frye

Frequent Co-Authors

John J.B. Allen
John J.B. Allen University of Arizona
Joseph P. Allen
Joseph P. Allen University of Virginia
Richard J. Davidson
Richard J. Davidson University of Wisconsin–Madison
John M. Gottman
John M. Gottman University of Washington
David A. Sbarra
David A. Sbarra University of Arizona
Eddie Harmon-Jones
Eddie Harmon-Jones University of New South Wales
Siegwart Lindenberg
Siegwart Lindenberg University of Groningen
Robin Nusslock
Robin Nusslock Northwestern University
Lyn Y. Abramson
Lyn Y. Abramson University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens up many professional pathways, especially with the increasing availability of online degrees. Many U.S. universities now offer accredited online psychology programs, allowing students to balance their studies with personal commitments. Online learning provides flexibility, but it’s important to ensure your degree meets state-specific licensure requirements.

For those interested in clinical roles, becoming a licensed therapist is a common pathway. Each state has its own regulations. If you want to know how to become a licensed therapist in Newark, you'll find rigorous education and supervision standards. Similarly, Norfolk licensed therapist requirements emphasize a strong foundation in counseling as well as ethics training.

Other regions also have unique steps toward licensure. Learning how to become a licensed therapist in North Las Vegas or becoming a licensed therapist in Oakland requires careful attention to local laws and supervised clinical hours. Understanding these variations is crucial when planning your educational path and future psychology career in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing James A. Coan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles