World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Martha Ann Bell

Martha Ann Bell

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
50
Citations
9955
World Ranking
5438
National Ranking
2971

Martha Ann Bell publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martha Ann Bell sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 187 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Martha Ann Bell D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martha Ann Bell sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2007 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Martha Ann Bell is affiliated with Virginia Tech in the United States and has an extensive research portfolio primarily in the field of Psychology. Their work spans several subfields, including Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Education, Social Psychology, and Developmental and Educational Psychology.

The principal subjects of their research include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, Early Childhood Education and Development, Neuroendocrine Regulation and Behavior, Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, Child and Animal Learning Development, Cognitive Abilities and Testing, and Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum.

Recent publications by Martha Ann Bell include:

  • "The Facial Action Coding System for Characterization of Human Affective Response to Consumer Product-Based Stimuli: A Systematic Review" (2020), published in Frontiers in Psychology
  • "Mother-child behavioral and physiological synchrony" (2020), published in Advances in Child Development and Behavior
  • "Relations between frontal EEG maturation and inhibitory control in preschool in the prediction of children's early academic skills" (2020), published in Brain and Cognition
  • "The early childhood inhibitory touchscreen task: A new measure of response inhibition in toddlerhood and across the lifespan" (2021), published in PLoS ONE
  • "Characterizing consumer emotional response to milk packaging guides packaging material selection" (2020), published in Food Quality and Preference

Collaborations have been a significant part of their scientific output. Frequent coauthors include Madeleine Bruce, Jennifer J. Phillips, Kirby Deater-Deckard, Ran Liu, and Cynthia L. Smith.

Martha Ann Bell has published predominantly in several journals, with multiple contributions in:

  • Developmental Psychobiology
  • Developmental Psychology
  • PLoS ONE
  • Cognitive Development
  • Infant Behavior and Development

In 2007, Martha Ann Bell was recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA).

Best Publications

  • The relations between frontal brain electrical activity and cognitive development during infancy.

    Martha Ann Bell;Nathan A. Fox

  • Emotion and Cognition: An Intricately Bound Developmental Process

    Martha Ann Bell;Christy D. Wolfe

  • Maternal executive function, harsh parenting, and child conduct problems

    Kirby Deater-Deckard;Zhe Wang;Nan Chen;Martha Ann Bell

  • Working memory and inhibitory control in early childhood: Contributions from physiology, temperament, and language.

    Christy D. Wolfe;Martha Ann Bell

  • Using EEG to Study Cognitive Development: Issues and Practices

    Martha Ann Bell;Kimberly Cuevas

  • What's mom got to do with it? Contributions of maternal executive function and caregiving to the development of executive function across early childhood.

    Kimberly Cuevas;Kirby Deater-Deckard;Jungmeen Kim-Spoon;Amanda J. Watson

  • Infant Attention and Early Childhood Executive Function

    Kimberly Cuevas;Martha Ann Bell

  • Neural plasticity and development in the first two years of life: Evidence from cognitive and socioemotional domains of research

    Nathan A. Fox;Susan D. Calkins;Martha Ann Bell

  • Biological Systems and the Development of Self-Regulation: Integrating Behavior, Genetics, and Psychophysiology

    Martha Ann Bell;Kirby Deater-Deckard

  • The Integration of Cognition and Emotion during Infancy and Early Childhood: Regulatory Processes Associated with the Development of Working Memory.

    Christy D. Wolfe;Martha Ann Bell

  • Individual differences in response to stress and cerebral asymmetry.

    Nathan A. Fox;Martha Ann Bell;Nancy Aaron Jones

  • Changes in Brain Functioning From Infancy to Early Childhood: Evidence From EEG Power and Coherence During Working Memory Tasks

    Martha Ann Bell;Christy D. Wolfe

  • Crawling experience is related to changes in cortical organization during infancy: evidence from EEG coherence.

    Martha Ann Bell;Nathan A. Fox

  • Child development at the intersection of emotion and cognition

    Susan D. Calkins;Martha Ann Bell

  • Longitudinal Associations between the Quality of Mother-Infant Interactions and Brain Development across Infancy.

    Annie Bernier;Susan D. Calkins;Martha Ann Bell

  • Individual differences in object permanence performance at 8 months: locomotor experience and brain electrical activity

    Martha Ann Bell;Nathan A. Fox

  • The Role of Inhibitory Control in Behavioral and Physiological Expressions of Toddler Executive Function

    Katherine C. Morasch;Martha Ann Bell

  • Sex differences on a mental rotation task: variations in electroencephalogram hemispheric activation between children and college students.

    Jonathan E. Roberts;Martha Ann Bell

  • Stroop color—word interference and electroencephalogram activation: Evidence for age-related decline of the anterior attention system.

    Robert West;Martha Ann Bell

  • Brain Electrical Activity Associated With Cognitive Processing During a Looking Version of the A‐Not‐B Task

    Martha Ann Bell

Frequent Co-Authors

Susan D. Calkins
Susan D. Calkins University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Kirby Deater-Deckard
Kirby Deater-Deckard University of Massachusetts Amherst
Nathan A. Fox
Nathan A. Fox University of Maryland, College Park
Angela Scarpa
Angela Scarpa Virginia Tech
Sherryl H. Goodman
Sherryl H. Goodman Emory University
Maria A. Gartstein
Maria A. Gartstein Washington State University
Stuart Marcovitch
Stuart Marcovitch University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Susan W. White
Susan W. White University of Alabama
Ronald E. Dahl
Ronald E. Dahl University of California, Berkeley
Megan R. Gunnar
Megan R. Gunnar University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens the door to numerous online degrees and specialized career pathways in the field of behavioral and communication sciences. One prominent career option is becoming a speech-language pathologist (SLP), a professional who helps individuals with speech, language, and communication disorders.

To become an SLP, students typically need a master’s degree and must fulfill state-specific requirements for licensure. For example, those interested in working in Indiana should review the Indiana slp certification requirements for details on clinical hours and examinations. Similarly, the Iowa slp certification requirements outline Iowa's unique prerequisites.

Prospective students may also want to consider the slp requirements in Kansas or the Kentucky slp certification requirements to compare regional differences. Understanding these requirements can help future professionals choose the right educational pathway and ensure they meet all necessary criteria for certification, no matter where they plan to practice.

Best Scientists Citing Martha Ann Bell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles