World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
51
Citations
11239
World Ranking
5188
National Ranking
545

Emily J.H. Jones publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emily J.H. Jones sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 223 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Emily J.H. Jones D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emily J.H. Jones sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Emily J.H. Jones is affiliated with Birkbeck, University of London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans several interconnected fields and focuses heavily on neurodevelopmental disorders, especially autism spectrum disorder.

Their research output includes a range of recent papers published in reputable journals. Notable publications include:

  • Autism spectrum disorder, 2020, Nature Reviews Disease Primers
  • The Developing Human Connectome Project Neonatal Data Release, 2022, Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • From mechanisms to markers: novel noninvasive EEG proxy markers of the neural excitation and inhibition system in humans, 2022, Translational Psychiatry
  • Alexithymia in autism: cross-sectional and longitudinal associations with social-communication difficulties, anxiety and depression symptoms, 2020, Psychological Medicine
  • Atypical Brain Asymmetry in Autism-A Candidate for Clinically Meaningful Stratification, 2020, Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging

Emily J.H. Jones collaborates frequently with a number of researchers in their domain. These co-authors include:

  • Tony Charman
  • Mark H. Johnson
  • Luke Mason
  • Declan Murphy
  • Jan K. Buitelaar

Their publication record spans various venues, indicating broad engagement with the academic community in neuroscience and autism research. Common publication outlets include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Molecular Autism
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Emily's work is situated mainly in the overlapping disciplines of Neuroscience, Medicine, and Psychology. Their focus extends especially into subfields such as:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Their principal research topics cover areas with significant implications for developmental and clinical understanding, including:

  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Family and Disability Support Research
  • Neural dynamics and brain function

Best Publications

  • Autism spectrum disorder

    Catherine Lord;Traolach S Brugha;Tony Charman;James Cusack

  • Early behavioral intervention is associated with normalized brain activity in young children with autism

    Geraldine Dawson;Emily J.H. Jones;Kristen Merkle;Kaitlin Venema

  • Developmental pathways to autism: a review of prospective studies of infants at risk.

    Emily J.H. Jones;Teodora Gliga;Rachael Bedford;Tony Charman

  • Parent-mediated intervention versus no intervention for infants at high risk of autism: a parallel, single-blind, randomised trial

    Jonathan Green;Tony Charman;Andrew Pickles;Andrew Pickles;Ming W Wan

  • Randomised trial of a parent-mediated intervention for infants at high risk for autism: longitudinal outcomes to age 3 years

    Jonathan Green;Jonathan Green;Andrew Pickles;Andrew Pickles;Greg Pasco;Greg Pasco;Rachael Bedford

  • Executive function in the first three years of life: precursors, predictors and patterns

    Alexandra Hendry;Emily J.H. Jones;Tony Charman

  • Annual Research Review: Infant development, autism, and ADHD – early pathways to emerging disorders

    Mark H. Johnson;Teodora Gliga;Emily J.H. Jones;T. Charman

  • The EU-AIMS Longitudinal European Autism Project (LEAP): design and methodologies to identify and validate stratification biomarkers for autism spectrum disorders

    Eva Loth;Tony Charman;Luke Mason;Julian Tillmann

  • The motivation for very early intervention for infants at high risk for autism spectrum disorders

    Sara Jane Webb;Emily J.H. Jones;Jean F. Kelly;Geraldine Dawson

  • Brain adaptation and alternative developmental trajectories.

    Mark H. Johnson;Emily J. H. Jones;Teodora Gliga

  • From early markers to neuro-developmental mechanisms of autism

    Teodora Gliga;Emily J.H. Jones;R. Bedford;T. Charman

  • EEG hyper-connectivity in high-risk infants is associated with later autism

    Elena V Orekhova;Mayada Elsabbagh;Emily Jh Jones;Geraldine Dawson

  • The EU-AIMS Longitudinal European Autism Project (LEAP): Clinical characterisation

    Tony Charman;Eva Loth;Julian Tillmann;Daisy Crawley

  • Non-ASD outcomes at 36 months in siblings at familial risk for autism spectrum disorder (ASD): A baby siblings research consortium (BSRC) study.

    Tony Charman;Gregory S. Young;Jessica Brian;Alice Carter

  • Identification and validation of biomarkers for autism spectrum disorders

    Eva Loth;Will Spooren;Lindsay M. Ham;Maria B. Isaac

  • Reduced engagement with social stimuli in 6-month-old infants with later autism spectrum disorder: a longitudinal prospective study of infants at high familial risk.

    E. J. H. Jones;K. Venema;R. Earl;R. Lowy

  • Parent-delivered early intervention in infants at risk for ASD: Effects on electrophysiological and habituation measures of social attention.

    Emily J.H. Jones;Geraldine Dawson;Jean Kelly;Annette Estes

  • Altered connectivity between cerebellum, visual, and sensory-motor networks in autism spectrum disorder: Results from the EU-AIMS Longitudinal European Autism Project

    Marianne Oldehinkel;Marianne Oldehinkel;Maarten Mennes;Andre Marquand;Tony Charman

  • Atypical Brain Asymmetry in Autism-A Candidate for Clinically Meaningful Stratification.

    Dorothea L Floris;Thomas Wolfers;Mariam Zabihi;Nathalie E Holz

  • Developmental changes in infant brain activity during naturalistic social experiences

    Emily J. H. Jones;Kaitlin Venema;Rachel Lowy;Rachel K. Earl

  • From pattern classification to stratification: towards conceptualizing the heterogeneity of Autism Spectrum Disorder.

    Thomas Wolfers;Dorothea L. Floris;Richard Dinga;Daan van Rooij

  • Early developmental pathways to childhood symptoms of attention‐deficit hyperactivity disorder, anxiety and autism spectrum disorder

    Elizabeth Shephard;Rachael Bedford;Bosiljka Milosavljevic;Teodora Gliga

  • Shorter spontaneous fixation durations in infants with later emerging autism.

    Sam V. Wass;Emily J. H. Jones;Teodora Gliga;Tim J. Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark H. Johnson
Mark H. Johnson University of Cambridge
Tony Charman
Tony Charman King's College London
Teodora Gliga
Teodora Gliga University of East Anglia
Sara Jane Webb
Sara Jane Webb Seattle Children's Hospital
Sven Bölte
Sven Bölte Karolinska Institute
Jan K. Buitelaar
Jan K. Buitelaar Radboud University
Declan G. Murphy
Declan G. Murphy King's College London
Michael V. Lombardo
Michael V. Lombardo Italian Institute of Technology
Eva Loth
Eva Loth King's College London
Geraldine Dawson
Geraldine Dawson Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology opens doors to a wide range of rewarding career pathways, both online and on-campus. Students can choose from affordable options to specialized programs based on their interests and location. If budget is a concern, consider browsing affordable psychology programs in Vermont, which offer quality education without breaking the bank.

For those seeking popular programs in dynamic regions, there’s no shortage of choices. Many students are drawn to popular psychology programs in Charlotte, where local opportunities for internships and jobs abound. Similarly, the top-ranked psychology degree programs in Washington, D.C. are recognized for combining rigorous academics with direct access to renowned research institutions, government, and non-profits.

Looking for flexibility? Online degrees and hybrid courses offered by many top-ranked psychology degree programs in Delaware allow students to balance education with work or family commitments. Whether your goal is counseling, research, education, or healthcare, having the right degree makes a significant difference in your professional journey.

Best Scientists Citing Emily J.H. Jones

Trending Scientists