World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 56 3465 3271 122 114 184 16790

Victor Guryev publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Victor Guryev between 2000 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Victor Guryev published across 27 years, from 2000 to 2026, averaging 8.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2018. 16 of the 239 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2018. 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 3 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 22 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 14 publications 2026: 2 publications
2000 2026

239 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Victor Guryev: publications per year, 2000 to 2026
Year Publications
2000 2
2001 1
2002 3
2003 1
2004 3
2005 5
2006 4
2007 2
2008 6
2009 5
2010 6
2011 8
2012 3
2013 7
2014 12
2015 10
2016 11
2017 16
2018 22
2019 16
2020 12
2021 16
2022 17
2023 21
2024 14
2025 14
2026 2
Total 239
Download as CSV

Victor Guryev publications per year - data summary

  • Victor Guryev, a Genetics scholar from University Medical Center Groningen, has 239 publications recorded across 27 years, from 2000 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2000 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2018, with 22 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 2001 and 2003, with 1 publication each.
  • The rate of publication averages 8.9 papers per year over the whole span, or 8.9 per year counting only the 27 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 68 publications, 28% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2000-2008: 27 publications (3.0 per year); 2009-2017: 78 publications (8.7 per year); 2018-2026: 134 publications (14.9 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Victor Guryev publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Victor Guryev sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 175–184 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 184 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178 184
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Victor Guryev publication distribution in Genetics in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 4,342 Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 67 ranges running from 45–54 to 703+ publications.
  • Victor Guryev, a Genetics scholar from University Medical Center Groningen, records 184 publications - the 44th percentile of the discipline.
  • 44% of ranked Genetics scientists score the same or lower than Victor Guryev, and about 56% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 195–204 publications range, and Victor Guryev ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 125–134 publications, holding 217 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 56% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 205–214 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 703 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (2% of the field).

Victor Guryev D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Victor Guryev sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179 56
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Victor Guryev D-index placement in Genetics in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 4,342 Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 61 ranges running from 40–41 to 160+ D-Index.
  • Victor Guryev, a Genetics scholar from University Medical Center Groningen, records 56 D-Index - the 21st percentile of the discipline.
  • 21% of ranked Genetics scientists score the same or lower than Victor Guryev, and about 79% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 70–71 D-Index range, and Victor Guryev ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 62–63 D-Index, holding 191 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 51% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 70–71 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more, 96 scientists in all (2% of the field).

Overview

Victor Guryev is affiliated with the University Medical Center Groningen in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a focus on molecular biology, genetics, cancer research, physiology, and immunology as key subfields.

The scientist's work covers several major topics including DNA repair mechanisms, genomics and chromatin dynamics, cancer-related molecular mechanisms, CRISPR and genetic engineering, asthma and respiratory diseases, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) research, and RNA modifications related to cancer.

Victor Guryev has contributed to numerous publications, with some of the most recent works being:

  • Eleven grand challenges in single-cell data science, 2020, Genome Biology
  • Whole-genome sequencing of 1,171 elderly admixed individuals from Brazil, 2022, Nature Communications
  • Sperm DNA damage causes genomic instability in early embryonic development, 2020, Science Advances
  • Sister chromatid exchanges induced by perturbed replication can form independently of BRCA1, BRCA2 and RAD51, 2022, Nature Communications
  • Variant calling: Considerations, practices, and developments, 2021, Human Mutation

The most frequent publication venues for Victor Guryev include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), ERJ Open Research, University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology), Nature Communications, and Scientific Reports.

Among frequent co-authors are Maarten van den Berge, Alen Faiz, Diana C.J. Spierings, Peter M. Lansdorp, and Martijn C. Nawijn, indicating a collaborative approach across diverse research topics and institutions.

Best Publications

  • Phylogenetic Shadowing and Computational Identification of Human microRNA Genes

    Eugene Berezikov;Victor Guryev;José van de Belt;Erno Wienholds

  • Eleven grand challenges in single-cell data science

    David Lähnemann;David Lähnemann;Johannes Köster;Johannes Köster;Ewa Szczurek;Davis J. McCarthy;Davis J. McCarthy

  • Multi-platform discovery of haplotype-resolved structural variation in human genomes

    Mark J.P. Chaisson;Mark J.P. Chaisson;Ashley D. Sanders;Xuefang Zhao;Xuefang Zhao;Ankit Malhotra

  • Transcription factor achaete scute-like 2 controls intestinal stem cell fate.

    Laurens G van der Flier;Marielle E van Gijn;Pantelis Hatzis;Pekka Kujala

  • Unmasking Transcriptional Heterogeneity in Senescent Cells

    Alejandra Hernandez-Segura;Tristan V. de Jong;Simon Melov;Victor Guryev

  • Whole-genome sequence variation, population structure and demographic history of the Dutch population

    Laurent C. Francioli;Androniki Menelaou;Sara L. Pulit;Freerk van Dijk

  • Computational pan-genomics: status, promises and challenges.

    Tobias Marschall;Manja Marz;Manja Marz;Thomas Abeel;Louis Dijkstra

  • Genome-wide patterns and properties of de novo mutations in humans

    Laurent C Francioli;Paz P Polak;Amnon Koren;Androniki Menelaou

  • Chromothripsis as a mechanism driving complex de novo structural rearrangements in the germline

    Wigard P. Kloosterman;Victor Guryev;Mark van Roosmalen;Karen J. Duran

  • Many novel mammalian microRNA candidates identified by extensive cloning and RAKE analysis

    Eugene Berezikov;Geert van Tetering;Mark Verheul;Jose van de Belt

  • The Genome of the Netherlands: design, and project goals

    Dorret I. Boomsma;Cisca Wijmenga;Eline P. Slagboom;Morris A. Swertz

  • Genome-wide RNA Tomography in the Zebrafish Embryo

    Jan Philipp Junker;Emily S Noël;Victor Guryev;Kevin A Peterson

  • Genome-wide pattern of TCF7L2/TCF4 chromatin occupancy in colorectal cancer cells.

    Pantelis Hatzis;Laurens G van der Flier;Marc A van Driel;Victor Guryev

  • Distribution and functional impact of DNA copy number variation in the rat

    Victor Guryev;Kathrin Saar;Tatjana Adamovic;Mark Verheul

  • Genetic variation in the zebrafish

    Victor Guryev;Marco J. Koudijs;Eugene Berezikov;Stephen L. Johnson

  • Single-cell sequencing reveals karyotype heterogeneity in murine and human malignancies

    Bjorn Bakker;Aaron Taudt;Mirjam E. Belderbos;David Porubsky

  • Constitutional Chromothripsis Rearrangements Involve Clustered Double-Stranded DNA Breaks and Nonhomologous Repair Mechanisms

    Wigard P Kloosterman;Masoumeh Tavakoli-Yaraki;Markus J van Roosmalen;Ellen van Binsbergen

  • Chromothripsis is a common mechanism driving genomic rearrangements in primary and metastatic colorectal cancer

    Wigard P Kloosterman;Marlous Hoogstraat;Oscar Paling;Masoumeh Tavakoli-Yaraki

  • Generation of gene knockouts and mutant models in the laboratory rat by ENU-driven target-selected mutagenesis.

    Bart M G Smits;Josine B Mudde;Jose van de Belt;Mark Verheul

  • SNP and haplotype mapping for genetic analysis in the rat

    Kathrin Saar;Alfred Beck;Marie-Thérèse Bihoreau;Ewan Birney

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter M. Lansdorp
Peter M. Lansdorp University of British Columbia
Edwin Cuppen
Edwin Cuppen Utrecht University
Rainer Bischoff
Rainer Bischoff University of Groningen
Eugene Berezikov
Eugene Berezikov University Medical Center Groningen
Tobias Marschall
Tobias Marschall Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Norbert Hubner
Norbert Hubner Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine
Isaac J. Nijman
Isaac J. Nijman Utrecht University
Wim Timens
Wim Timens University Medical Center Groningen
Ronald H. A. Plasterk
Ronald H. A. Plasterk University of Amsterdam
Paul I. W. de Bakker
Paul I. W. de Bakker Vertex Pharmaceuticals (United Kingdom)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Genetics in the USA opens doors to a diverse range of healthcare and research careers. Many students interested in genetics also consider nursing degrees, given the overlap in scientific knowledge and clinical skills required. Flexible learning paths, such as nurse practitioner programs online, allow students to advance their qualifications while maintaining employment or balancing family responsibilities.

Those starting their healthcare journey may find online nursing degree programs to be an accessible entry point. If you are already a registered nurse, the cheapest rn to bsn options provide a cost-effective way to obtain your Bachelor of Science in Nursing, further expanding your career prospects.

For individuals aspiring to take on leadership, research, or advanced clinical roles, pursuing one of the best dnp programs online can be an excellent next step. Whether your interests lie in genetics, nursing, or combining both, these online programs offer flexible opportunities to grow your expertise and impact in healthcare and research settings.

Best Scientists Citing Victor Guryev

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles