World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
117
Citations
78988
World Ranking
4118
National Ranking
2254

Charles M. Balch publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles M. Balch sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 515 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Charles M. Balch D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles M. Balch sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 117 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Charles M. Balch is affiliated with The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on medical fields with an emphasis on oncology, radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging. The scientist has contributed substantially to the understanding and treatment of various cancer types, as well as advancing knowledge in public health and epidemiology.

The major topics of their work include:

  • Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
  • Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
  • Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
  • History of Medical Practice
  • Health and Medical Research Impacts

Balch has published extensively, with 81 publications in medicine and many focused more narrowly within subfields such as oncology (22), radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging (20), public health (8), epidemiology (7), and cancer research (6).

Frequent publication venues include:

  • Annals of Surgical Oncology (18 publications)
  • Breast Cancer (2 publications)
  • Cancer Research (2 publications)
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (2 publications)
  • BMC Medicine (1 publication)

Among the recent papers they contributed to are:

  • Distinct clinical and somatic mutational features of breast tumors with high-, low-, or non-expressing human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status (2022), published in BMC Medicine
  • Global Cancer Surgery: pragmatic solutions to improve cancer surgery outcomes worldwide (2023), published in The Lancet Oncology
  • The Clinicopathological and Survival Profiles Comparison Across Primary Sites in Acral Melanoma (2020), published in Annals of Surgical Oncology
  • An Evidence-Based Staging System for Mucosal Melanoma: A Proposal (2022), published in Annals of Surgical Oncology
  • Surgical Oncologists and the COVID-19 Pandemic: Guiding Cancer Patients Effectively through Turbulence and Change (2020), published in Annals of Surgical Oncology

Collaboration with colleagues is also noticeable, with frequent co-authors including Cheukfai Li, Guochun Zhang, Chongyang Ren, Hsiaopei Mok, and Li Cao. These partnerships indicate a networked research environment contributing collectively to oncology and related medical topics.

Best Publications

  • AJCC Cancer Staging Manual

    Mahul B. Amin;Stephen B. Edge;Frederick L. Greene;David R. Byrd

  • Final Version of 2009 AJCC Melanoma Staging and Classification

    Charles M. Balch;Jeffrey E. Gershenwald;Seng Jaw Soong;John F. Thompson

  • Final Version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System for Cutaneous Melanoma

    Charles M. Balch;Antonio C. Buzaid;Seng-Jaw Soong;Michael B. Atkins

  • Prognostic Factors Analysis of 17,600 Melanoma Patients: Validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Melanoma Staging System

    Charles M. Balch;Seng-Jaw Soong;Jeffrey E. Gershenwald;John F. Thompson

  • Burnout and medical errors among American surgeons.

    Tait D. Shanafelt;Charles M. Balch;Gerald Bechamps;Tom Russell

  • Melanoma staging: Evidence-based changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual.

    Jeffrey E. Gershenwald;Richard A. Scolyer;Kenneth R. Hess;Vernon K. Sondak

  • A differentiation antigen of human NK and K cells identified by a monoclonal antibody (HNK-1).

    T. Abo;Charles M Balch

  • Burnout and career satisfaction among American surgeons.

    Tait D. Shanafelt;Charles M. Balch;Gerald J. Bechamps;Thomas Russell

  • Multi-institutional melanoma lymphatic mapping experience: the prognostic value of sentinel lymph node status in 612 stage I or II melanoma patients.

    Jeffrey E. Gershenwald;William Thompson;Paul F. Mansfield;Jeffrey E. Lee

  • Special Report: Suicidal Ideation Among American Surgeons

    Tait D. Shanafelt;Charles M. Balch;Charles M. Balch;Lotte N. Dyrbye;Gerald Bechamps

  • The orderly progression of melanoma nodal metastases.

    Douglas Reintgen;C. Cruse;Karen Wells;Claudia Berman

  • Efficacy of an elective regional lymph node dissection of 1 to 4 mm thick melanomas for patients 60 years of age and younger.

    Charles M. Balch;Seng Jaw Soong;Alfred A. Bartolucci;Marshall M. Urist

  • A multifactorial analysis of melanoma: prognostic histopathological features comparing Clark's and Breslow's staging methods.

    Charles M. Balch;Tariq M. Murad;Seng-Jaw Soong;Anna Lee Ingalls

  • Efficacy of 2-cm surgical margins for intermediate-thickness melanomas (1 to 4 mm). Results of a multi-institutional randomized surgical trial.

    Charles M. Balch;Marshall M. Urist;Constantine P. Karakousis;Thomas J. Smith

  • Thin Stage I Primary Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma

    Umberto Veronesi;Natale Cascinelli;Jerzy Adamus;Jerzy Adamus;Charles M Balch

  • Relationship Between Work-Home Conflicts and Burnout Among American Surgeons: A Comparison by Sex

    Liselotte N. Dyrbye;Tait D. Shanafelt;Charles M. Balch;Daniel Satele

  • Diagnosis and Treatment of Early Melanoma: NIH Consensus Development Panel on Early Melanoma

    Lowell A. Goldsmith;Frederic B. Askin;Alfred E. Chang;Cynthia Cohen

  • Patterns of recurrence following a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy in 243 patients with stage I or II melanoma.

    Jeffrey E. Gershenwald;Maria I. Colome;Jeffrey E. Lee;Paul F. Mansfield

  • Global cancer surgery: delivering safe, affordable, and timely cancer surgery

    Richard Sullivan;Richard Sullivan;Olusegun Isaac Alatise;Benjamin O. Anderson;Benjamin O. Anderson;Riccardo Audisio

  • Long-Term Results of a Multi-Institutional Randomized Trial Comparing Prognostic Factors and Surgical Results for Intermediate Thickness Melanomas (1.0 to 4.0 mm)

    Charles M. Balch;Seng Jaw Soong;Merrick I. Ross;Marshall M. Urist

Frequent Co-Authors

Merrick I. Ross
Merrick I. Ross The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Jeffrey E. Gershenwald
Jeffrey E. Gershenwald The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
John F. Thompson
John F. Thompson University of Sydney
Andrew L. Warshaw
Andrew L. Warshaw Harvard University
John L. Cameron
John L. Cameron Johns Hopkins University
Alfred Cuschieri
Alfred Cuschieri University of Dundee
Kelly M. McMasters
Kelly M. McMasters University of Louisville
John P. Neoptolemos
John P. Neoptolemos Heidelberg University
Tait D. Shanafelt
Tait D. Shanafelt Stanford University
Daniel G. Coit
Daniel G. Coit Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those looking to expand their medical careers or pursue related fields, a wide range of online degrees offers both flexibility and affordability. One in-demand pathway is psychiatric nursing; students can explore the fastest pmhnp program options to quickly become psychiatric mental health nurse practitioners.

Interested in the business side of healthcare? Accredited online healthcare administration programs prepare graduates for administrative roles in hospitals, clinics, and public health organizations. The cost of these degrees can vary widely, so prospective students may want to compare mha degree cost details to find an affordable plan.

Advanced clinical leaders can consider earning a Doctor of Nursing Practice through the cheapest dnp program options currently available online. These programs open doors to leadership roles and specialized practice, all while accommodating busy schedules.

Best Scientists Citing Charles M. Balch

Trending Scientists