What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Internal medicine
- Surgery
- Cancer
Andrew L. Warshaw focuses on Surgery, Pancreas, Pancreatic disease, Pancreatitis and Pathology.
His study looks at the relationship between Surgery and topics such as Pancreatic fistula, which overlap with Gastric emptying.
His Pancreas study incorporates themes from Carcinoma, MEDLINE and Adenocarcinoma.
His Pancreatic disease study combines topics in areas such as Malignancy, Pancreatic cancer, Serous Cystadenoma, Metastasis and Radiology.
The study of Internal medicine and Gastroenterology are components of his Pancreatitis research.
In his study, Renal function is inextricably linked to Hyperamylasemia, which falls within the broad field of Gastroenterology.
His most cited work include:
- Hedgehog is an early and late mediator of pancreatic cancer tumorigenesis (1289 citations)
- Diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasms: a report of the cooperative pancreatic cyst study (1064 citations)
- Enzymatic defect in Fabry's disease. Ceramidetrihexosidase deficiency. (853 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary areas of investigation include Internal medicine, Surgery, Pancreas, Pancreatitis and Pathology.
As part of one scientific family, he deals mainly with the area of Internal medicine, narrowing it down to issues related to the Endocrinology, and often Amylase.
Andrew L. Warshaw has included themes like Pancreatic fistula and General surgery in his Surgery study.
His Pancreas research incorporates elements of Radiology and Adenocarcinoma.
His Pancreatitis research incorporates themes from Necrosis, Acute pancreatitis and Pancreatic disease.
His study in Pathology concentrates on Cyst and Malignancy.
He most often published in these fields:
- Internal medicine (30.13%)
- Surgery (24.62%)
- Pancreas (22.69%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2013-2021)?
- Internal medicine (30.13%)
- Pancreatic cancer (13.08%)
- Surgery (24.62%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary areas of study are Internal medicine, Pancreatic cancer, Surgery, Gastroenterology and Pancreas.
His studies in Internal medicine integrate themes in fields like Oncology and FOLFIRINOX.
His work investigates the relationship between Surgery and topics such as Pancreatic fistula that intersect with problems in Complication.
His work deals with themes such as Proportional hazards model and Hazard ratio, which intersect with Gastroenterology.
His Pancreas study incorporates themes from Lymph node and Pathology.
Andrew L. Warshaw combines subjects such as KRAS, Pancreatitis and Circulating tumor cell with his study of Pathology.
Between 2013 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Radiological and surgical implications of neoadjuvant treatment with FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. (454 citations)
- Predictors of Resectability and Survival in Patients With Borderline and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer who Underwent Neoadjuvant Treatment With FOLFIRINOX. (113 citations)
- Long-Term Risk of Pancreatic Malignancy in Patients with Branch Duct Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm in A Referral Center (92 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Internal medicine
- Surgery
- Cancer
Andrew L. Warshaw focuses on Internal medicine, Pancreatic cancer, Surgery, Pancreas and Gastroenterology.
His study in the fields of Lymph node, Adjuvant therapy and Biomarker under the domain of Internal medicine overlaps with other disciplines such as In patient.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Neoadjuvant therapy, Pancreatectomy, Survival analysis and Circulating tumor cell.
His Surgery research incorporates themes from Odds ratio and Pancreatic fistula.
His Pancreas study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Survival rate and Retrospective cohort study.
He studies Pancreatitis which is a part of Gastroenterology.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
