World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Roberto Salvia

Roberto Salvia

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
88
Citations
38322
World Ranking
12959
National Ranking
492

Roberto Salvia publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roberto Salvia sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 859 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Roberto Salvia D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roberto Salvia sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Roberto Salvia is affiliated with the University of Verona in Italy. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with extensive contributions to oncology, surgery, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, epidemiology, and cancer research. These main fields of study underpin a broad range of scientific inquiries, particularly related to pancreatic and hepatic oncology.

The scientist's work includes significant emphasis on several specialized topics:

  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
  • Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
  • Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
  • Renal cell carcinoma treatment

Salvia's recent notable papers illustrate a focus on various aspects of pancreatic diseases and surgical outcomes. Key publications include:

  • International evidence-based Kyoto guidelines for the management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas, 2023, Pancreatology
  • Comprehensive characterisation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with microsatellite instability: histology, molecular pathology and clinical implications, 2020, Gut
  • Postpancreatectomy Acute Pancreatitis (PPAP), 2021, Annals of Surgery
  • Non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: ATRX/DAXX and alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) are prognostically independent from ARX/PDX1 expression and tumour size, 2021, Gut
  • Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Resected Pancreatic Cancer After Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX Treatment, 2020, JAMA Oncology

Frequent collaborators in Salvia's research include Claudio Bassi, Giuseppe Malleo, Giovanni Marchegiani, Salvatore Paiella, and Massimo Falconi. These co-authors have contributed extensively alongside Salvia, with collaboration counts ranging from over eighty to nearly two hundred joint works.

Salvia's findings have been published across several respected academic journals, with a concentration in surgical and oncological outlets. The most frequent publication venues are:

  • HPB
  • Pancreatology
  • Annals of Surgical Oncology
  • Annals of Surgery
  • Surgery

Overall, Roberto Salvia's academic profile demonstrates a sustained research output centered on pancreatic diseases, cancer diagnostics, and surgical treatment methodologies, reflected in substantial publication records and collaborations within these medical subfields.

Best Publications

  • Genomic analyses identify molecular subtypes of pancreatic cancer

    Bailey P;Chang Dk;Nones K;Nones K;Johns Al

  • The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula : 11 Years After

    Claudio Bassi;Giovanni Marchegiani;Christos Dervenis;Micheal Sarr

  • Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes

    Peter J. Campbell;Gad Getz;Jan O. Korbel;Joshua M. Stuart

  • Revisions of international consensus Fukuoka guidelines for the management of IPMN of the pancreas.

    Masao Tanaka;Carlos Fernández-del Castillo;Terumi Kamisawa;Jin Young Jang

  • European evidence-based guidelines on pancreatic cystic neoplasms

    Marco Del Chiaro;Marc G. Besselink;Lianne Scholten;Marco J. Bruno

  • Patterns of somatic structural variation in human cancer genomes

    Yilong Li;Nicola D Roberts;Jeremiah A Wala;Jeremiah A Wala;Ofer Shapira;Ofer Shapira

  • Main-Duct Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas: Clinical Predictors of Malignancy and Long-term Survival Following Resection

    Roberto Salvia;Carlos Fernández-del Castillo;Claudio Bassi;Sarah P. Thayer

  • Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy : results of a comparative study

    Claudio Bassi;Massimo Falconi;Enrico Molinari;Roberto Salvia

  • European experts consensus statement on cystic tumours of the pancreas.

    Marco Del Chiaro;Caroline Verbeke;Roberto Salvia;Gunter Klöppel

  • Early versus late drain removal after standard pancreatic resections: results of a prospective randomized trial.

    Claudio Bassi;Enrico Molinari;Giuseppe Malleo;Stefano Crippa

  • Mucinous Cystic Neoplasm of the Pancreas is Not an Aggressive Entity: Lessons From 163 Resected Patients

    Stefano Crippa;Roberto Salvia;Andrew Louis Warshaw;Ismael Domínguez

  • Branch-Duct Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: Observations in 145 Patients Who Underwent Resection

    J. Ruben Rodriguez;Roberto Salvia;Stefano Crippa;Andrew L. Warshaw

  • A Combination of Molecular Markers and Clinical Features Improve the Classification of Pancreatic Cysts

    Simeon Springer;Yuxuan Wang;Marco Dal Molin;David L. Masica

  • Pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatic resection. The importance of definitions.

    Claudio Bassi;Giovanni Butturini;Enrico Molinari;Giuseppe Mascetta

  • Alcohol and Smoking as Risk Factors in Chronic Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Cancer

    G Talamini;Claudio Bassi;Massimo Falconi;N Sartori

  • Amylase value in drains after pancreatic resection as predictive factor of postoperative pancreatic fistula: results of a prospective study in 137 patients.

    Enrico Molinari;Claudio Bassi;Roberto Salvia;Giovanni Butturini

  • Duct-to-mucosa versus end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial.

    Claudio Bassi;Massimo Falconi;Enrico Molinari;William Mantovani

  • Serous cystic neoplasm of the pancreas: a multinational study of 2622 patients under the auspices of the International Association of Pancreatology and European Pancreatic Club (European Study Group on Cystic Tumors of the Pancreas)

    B Jais;V Rebours;G Malleo;R Salvia

  • Mucin-Producing Neoplasms of the Pancreas: An Analysis of Distinguishing Clinical and Epidemiologic Characteristics

    Stefano Crippa;Carlos Fernández–del Castillo;Roberto Salvia;Dianne Madelyn Finkelstein

  • Controlled clinical trial of pefloxacin versus imipenem in severe acute pancreatitis

    Claudio Bassi;Massimo Falconi;Giorgio Talamini;Generoso Uomo

Frequent Co-Authors

Claudio Bassi
Claudio Bassi University of Verona
Massimo Falconi
Massimo Falconi Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Paolo Pederzoli
Paolo Pederzoli University of Verona
Aldo Scarpa
Aldo Scarpa University of Verona
Michele Milella
Michele Milella University of Verona
Marc G. Besselink
Marc G. Besselink University of Amsterdam
Christopher L. Wolfgang
Christopher L. Wolfgang New York University
Giuseppe Zamboni
Giuseppe Zamboni University of Verona
Keith D. Lillemoe
Keith D. Lillemoe Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine doesn’t always follow a traditional route. Today, a variety of flexible online degrees cater to those looking to break into healthcare or advance existing careers. Entry-level professionals can get started with a medical coding certification online, which focuses on essential skills for medical records and healthcare billing.

Nursing remains one of the most in-demand fields. Students looking for accessible options should consider cheap online nursing programs to earn their degrees affordably and with flexibility. More experienced nurses can take the next step by enrolling in comprehensive nurse practitioner programs, which open up advanced clinical opportunities and specializations.

For those aspiring to leadership, research, or academic roles, earning a phd in nursing online provides a pathway to top-tier careers in nursing education and policy. Each of these online degrees offers flexibility, but students should carefully consider program accreditation, costs, and career outcomes before enrolling.

Best Scientists Citing Roberto Salvia

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles