World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
80
Citations
21987
World Ranking
17177
National Ranking
8610

Charles M. Vollmer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles M. Vollmer sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 368 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Charles M. Vollmer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles M. Vollmer sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Charles M. Vollmer is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with a significant focus on Oncology and Surgery. The scientist has published extensively across several subfields, including Oncology, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cancer Research, and Epidemiology.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
  • Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Renal Cell Carcinoma Treatment
  • Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
  • Esophageal and Gastrointestinal Pathology

Vollmer's recent influential papers reflect these areas of study and include:

  • Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (2021) published in Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
  • A Simple Classification of Pancreatic Duct Size and Texture Predicts Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula (2021) published in Annals of Surgery
  • Postpancreatectomy Acute Pancreatitis (PPAP) (2021) published in Annals of Surgery
  • A Multianalyte Panel Consisting of Extracellular Vesicle miRNAs and mRNAs, cfDNA, and CA19-9 Shows Utility for Diagnosis and Staging of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (2020) published in Clinical Cancer Research
  • ASGE guideline on screening for pancreatic cancer in individuals with genetic susceptibility: summary and recommendations (2022) published in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Fabio Casciani
  • Claudio Bassi
  • Marc G. Besselink
  • Maxwell T. Trudeau
  • Massimo Falconi

Vollmer's publications appear across multiple prominent venues. Notable journals where their research is frequently published include:

  • Surgery
  • HPB
  • Annals of Surgery
  • Gastroenterology
  • JAMA Surgery

Best Publications

  • A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy.

    Mark P. Callery;Wande B. Pratt;Tara S. Kent;Elliot L. Chaikof

  • Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a consensus statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS).

    Maximilian Bockhorn;Faik G. Uzunoglu;Mustapha Adham;Clem Imrie

  • Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2021

    Margaret A. Tempero;Mokenge P. Malafa;Mahmoud Al-Hawary;Stephen W. Behrman

  • Definition of a standard lymphadenectomy in surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a consensus statement by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS).

    Johanna A.M.G. Tol;Dirk J. Gouma;Claudio Bassi;Christos Dervenis

  • Clinical and Economic Validation of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) Classification Scheme

    Wande B. Pratt;Shishir K. Maithel;Tsafrir Vanounou;Zhen S. Huang

  • Risk prediction for development of pancreatic fistula using the ISGPF classification scheme.

    Wande B. Pratt;Mark P. Callery;Charles M. Vollmer

  • A randomized prospective multicenter trial of pancreaticoduodenectomy with and without routine intraperitoneal drainage

    George Van Buren;Mark Bloomston;Steven J. Hughes;Jordan Winter

  • An aggressive surgical approach leads to improved survival in patients with gallbladder cancer: a 12-year study at a North American Center.

    Elijah Dixon;Charles M. Vollmer;Ajay Sahajpal;Mark Cattral

  • Alternative Fistula Risk Score for Pancreatoduodenectomy (a-FRS): Design and International External Validation.

    Timothy H. Mungroop;L. Bengt Van Rijssen;David Van Klaveren;F. Jasmijn Smits

  • Factors Associated with Early Recurrence after Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Outcomes

    Shimul A. Shah;Paul D. Greig;Steven Gallinger;Mark S. Cattral

  • Definition and classification of chyle leak after pancreatic operation: A consensus statement by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery

    Marc G. Besselink;L. Bengt van Rijssen;Claudio Bassi;Christos Dervenis

  • Extended pancreatectomy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: definition and consensus of the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS).

    Werner Hartwig;Charles M. Vollmer;Abe Fingerhut;Charles J. Yeo

  • Meta-analysis of pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

    A. McKay;S. Mackenzie;F. R. Sutherland;O. F. Bathe

  • Surgical Treatment of Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreas Cancer: Expert Consensus Statement

    Douglas B. Evans;Michael B. Farnell;Keith D. Lillemoe;Charles Vollmer

  • Generation of Human T-cell Responses to an HLA-A2.1-restricted Peptide Epitope Derived from α-Fetoprotein

    Lisa H. Butterfield;Andrew Koh;Wilson Meng;Charles M. Vollmer

  • Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy and Gemcitabine for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

    Anand Mahadevan;Sanjay Jain;Michael Goldstein;Rebecca Miksad

  • A Root-Cause Analysis of Mortality Following Major Pancreatectomy

    Charles Mahlon Vollmer;Norberto Sanchez;Stephen Gondek;John McAuliffe

  • Induction gemcitabine and stereotactic body radiotherapy for locally advanced nonmetastatic pancreas cancer.

    Anand Mahadevan;Rebecca Miksad;Michael Goldstein;Ryan Sullivan

  • Genetic Immunization for the Melanoma Antigen MART-1/Melan-A Using Recombinant Adenovirus-transduced Murine Dendritic Cells

    Antoni Ribas;Lisa H. Butterfield;William H. McBride;Syed M. Jilani

  • α-Fetoprotein-specific Genetic Immunotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

    Charles M. Vollmer;Fritz C. Eilber;Lisa H. Butterfield;Antoni Ribas

Frequent Co-Authors

Claudio Bassi
Claudio Bassi University of Verona
Douglas L. Fraker
Douglas L. Fraker University of Pennsylvania
Marc G. Besselink
Marc G. Besselink University of Amsterdam
Christopher L. Wolfgang
Christopher L. Wolfgang New York University
Kevin C. Conlon
Kevin C. Conlon Trinity College Dublin
Keith D. Lillemoe
Keith D. Lillemoe Harvard University
Roberto Salvia
Roberto Salvia University of Verona
John P. Neoptolemos
John P. Neoptolemos Heidelberg University
David A. Kooby
David A. Kooby Emory University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering medical careers in the USA, there are several flexible online pathways that can help you advance or transition within healthcare. For nurses aiming for leadership roles without extensive onsite requirements, a dnp program without clinical hours offers a convenient way to earn a top nursing credential.

Those seeking entry into nursing quickly may also benefit from fast track medical programs, which accelerate learning and get you on the job sooner.

For a specialized and high-demand clinical path, accelerated msn psychiatric np programs prepare professionals to meet urgent mental health needs efficiently—often entirely online.

If you’re interested in the management and operational side of healthcare, an affordable healthcare administration degree online can help you move into a non-clinical, leadership-focused role with greater flexibility and career growth potential.

Best Scientists Citing Charles M. Vollmer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles