World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
85
Citations
22582
World Ranking
14743
National Ranking
7455

David A. Kooby publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David A. Kooby sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 535 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

David A. Kooby D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David A. Kooby sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

David A. Kooby is a researcher primarily affiliated with Emory University in the United States. Their academic contributions are principally in the field of Medicine, with a focus encompassing Oncology, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology, and Cancer Research.

Their research features prominently in the area of Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology, addressing topics such as Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes, Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment, Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics, Neuroendocrine Tumor Research, Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer, and broader Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders.

David A. Kooby's frequent publication venues include:

  • Annals of Surgical Oncology
  • HPB
  • Journal of Surgical Oncology
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Annals of Surgery

Key recent papers illustrating their research focus are:

  • Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for resectable pancreatic cancer (DIPLOMA): an international randomised non-inferiority trial, 2023, The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
  • Defining Benchmark Outcomes for Pancreatoduodenectomy With Portomesenteric Venous Resection, 2020, Annals of Surgery
  • Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy, 2022, Annals of Surgery
  • Morphologic Variants of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Clinicopathologic Analysis and Prognostic Stratification, 2020, Endocrine Pathology
  • An International Expert Delphi Consensus on Defining Textbook Outcome in Liver Surgery (TOLS), 2022, Annals of Surgery

Among frequent collaborators are:

  • Shishir K. Maithel
  • Mihir M. Shah
  • Juan M. Sarmiento
  • Maria C. Russell
  • Kenneth Cardona

Best Publications

  • Influence of Transfusions on Perioperative and Long-Term Outcome in Patients Following Hepatic Resection for Colorectal Metastases

    David A. Kooby;Jennifer Stockman;Leah Ben-Porat;Mithat Gonen

  • Impact of steatosis on perioperative outcome following hepatic resection

    David A Kooby;Yuman Fong;Arief Suriawinata;Mithat Gonen

  • Surgical Management of Hepatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Metastasis: Results from an International Multi-Institutional Analysis

    Skye C. Mayo;Mechteld C. De Jong;Carlo Pulitano;Brian M. Clary

  • Left-sided pancreatectomy: a multicenter comparison of laparoscopic and open approaches.

    David A. Kooby;David A. Kooby;Theresa Gillespie;Theresa Gillespie;David Jason Bentrem;Attila Nakeeb

  • Current Management of Gallbladder Carcinoma

    Andrew X. Zhu;Theodore S. Hong;Aram F. Hezel;David A. Kooby

  • A Multicenter Analysis of Distal Pancreatectomy for Adenocarcinoma: Is Laparoscopic Resection Appropriate?

    David A. Kooby;David A. Kooby;William G. Hawkins;C. Max Schmidt;Sharon M. Weber

  • Incidence of Finding Residual Disease for Incidental Gallbladder Carcinoma: Implications for Re-resection

    Timothy M. Pawlik;Ana Luiza Gleisner;Luca Vigano;David A. Kooby

  • Too Frail for Surgery? Initial Results of a Large Multidisciplinary Prospective Study Examining Preoperative Variables Predictive of Poor Surgical Outcomes

    Louis M. Revenig;Daniel J. Canter;Maxwell D. Taylor;Caroline Tai

  • Primary retroperitoneal teratomas: a review of the literature.

    Heather G. Gatcombe;Vasily Assikis;David Kooby;MA Peter A.S. Johnstone Md

  • Factors Influencing Readmission After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Multi-Institutional Study of 1302 Patients.

    Syed A. Ahmad;Michael J. Edwards;Jeffrey M. Sutton;Sanjeet S. Grewal

  • A multi-institutional comparison of perioperative outcomes of robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy

    Amer H. Zureikat;Lauren M. Postlewait;Yuan Liu;Theresa W. Gillespie

  • Liver cell adenoma: A multicenter analysis of risk factors for rupture and malignancy

    Jeremiah L. Deneve;Timothy M. Pawlik;Steve Cunningham;Bryan Clary

  • Comparison of conventional transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and chemoembolization with doxorubicin drug eluting beads (DEB) for unresectable hepatocelluar carcinoma (HCC).

    Renumathy Dhanasekaran;David A. Kooby;Charles A. Staley;John S. Kauh

  • Colonic motor dysfunction in human diabetes is associated with enteric neuronal loss and increased oxidative stress.

    Bindu Chandrasekharan;Mallappa Anitha;Richard Blatt;Nikrad Shahnavaz

  • Novel Pancreaticojejunostomy with a Low Rate of Anastomotic Failure-Related Complications

    Stephen R. Grobmyer;David Kooby;Leslie H. Blumgart;Steven N. Hochwald

  • Arterial and venous resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: operative and long-term outcomes.

    Robert C. G. Martin;Charles R. Scoggins;Vasili Egnatashvili;Charles A. Staley

  • Characterization of a Recurrent Germ Line Mutation of the E-Cadherin Gene: Implications for Genetic Testing and Clinical Management

    Gianpaolo Suriano;Gianpaolo Suriano;Sandie Yew;Paulo Ferreira;Janine Senz

  • Comparison of Yttrium-90 Radioembolization and Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for the Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

    David A. Kooby;Vasili Egnatashvili;Swetha Srinivasan;Abbas Chamsuddin

  • Oncolytic viral therapy for human colorectal cancer and liver metastases using a multi-mutated herpes simplex virus type-1 (G207)

    David A. Kooby;John F. Carew;Marc W. Halterman;Jonathan E. Mack

  • Modified FOLFIRINOX regimen with improved safety and maintained efficacy in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

    Hemchandra Mahaseth;Edith Brutcher;John Kauh;Natalyn Hawk

Frequent Co-Authors

Shishir K. Maithel
Shishir K. Maithel Emory University
Timothy M. Pawlik
Timothy M. Pawlik The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
Robert C.G. Martin
Robert C.G. Martin University of Louisville
William G. Hawkins
William G. Hawkins Washington University in St. Louis
David J. Bentrem
David J. Bentrem Northwestern University
Edward A. Levine
Edward A. Levine Wake Forest University
Volkan Adsay
Volkan Adsay Koç University
Kelly M. McMasters
Kelly M. McMasters University of Louisville
Marc G. Besselink
Marc G. Besselink University of Amsterdam
Charles M. Vollmer
Charles M. Vollmer University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers in medicine extends far beyond the traditional path of becoming a doctor. Many healthcare professionals are advancing their qualifications and broadening job prospects through online programs tailored to meet today’s demands.

Healthcare management is a fast-growing field, and students can now pursue a cahme accredited online mha to gain leadership skills in hospital administration and healthcare systems. For registered nurses, the flexibility of a rn to bsn online with no clinicals program makes it easier to earn a bachelor's degree without disrupting work schedules.

Aspiring nurse practitioners and advanced clinicians can shorten the path to a doctorate by enrolling in accelerated dnp programs, helping them achieve leadership roles or specialize more quickly. Those seeking manageable options might consider various online dnp programs known for their flexible formats and student support.

With many accredited online healthcare degrees and career pathways available, entering or advancing in the medical field is now more accessible than ever before.

Best Scientists Citing David A. Kooby

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles