World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
34
Citations
5265
World Ranking
9313
National Ranking
3934

Joseph R. Smith publications per year

1973: 1 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 13 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 11 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 12 publications 1995: 13 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 1 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 1 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 1 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 1 publications 2019: 1 publications
1973 2019

145 publications in total across all disciplines

Joseph R. Smith publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2027

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph R. Smith sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 144 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Joseph R. Smith D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2027

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph R. Smith sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joseph R. Smith is affiliated with Augusta University in the United States. Their academic contributions and research activity revolve around their role at this institution.

There is no specific data available regarding Joseph R. Smith's recent publications, frequent co-authors, or common venues for publishing their research. Similarly, information on main and subfields of study, as well as specific research topics, is not provided.

Details about any book publications, including publishers or the number of books authored, are also not available for Joseph R. Smith.

There is no record of awards or recognitions associated with Joseph R. Smith in the current data. The scientist is currently active and not deceased.

Best Publications

  • Cerebral language lateralization: evidence from intracarotid amobarbital testing

    David W. Loring;Kimford J. Meador;Gregory P. Lee;Anthony M. Murro

  • Effect of an external responsive neurostimulator on seizures and electrographic discharges during subdural electrode monitoring

    Eric H. Kossoff;Eva K. Ritzl;Jeffrey M. Politsky;Anthony M. Murro

  • Magnetic resonance imaging in childhood intractable partial epilepsies: pathologic correlations.

    Ruben Kuzniecky;A. Murro;D. King;R. Morawetz

  • A comparison of magnetoencephalography, MRI, and V-EEG in patients evaluated for epilepsy surgery.

    J. W. Wheless;L. J. Willmore;Joshua I Breier;M. Kataki

  • Implantation of a closed-loop stimulation in the management of medically refractory focal epilepsy: a technical note.

    Kostas N. Fountas;Joseph R. Smith;Anthony M. Murro;Jeffrey Politsky

  • Management of intracranial meningeal hemangiopericytomas: outcome and experience

    K. N. Fountas;E. Kapsalaki;M. Kassam;C. H. Feltes

  • Wada memory testing and hippocampal volume measurements in the evaluation for temporal lobectomy

    D. W. Loring;A. M. Murro;K. J. Meador;G. P. Lee

  • Wada memory asymmetries predict verbal memory decline after anterior temporal lobectomy

    David W. Loring;K. J. Meador;G. P. Lee;D. W. King

  • Presurgical localization of functional cortex using magnetic source imaging

    Christopher C. Gallen;Barry J. Schwartz;Richard D. Bucholz;Ghaus Malik

  • Computerized seizure detection of complex partial seizures.

    Anthony M. Murro;Anthony M. Murro;Don W. King;Joseph R. Smith;Brian B. Gallagher

  • The intracarotid amobarbital procedure as a predictor of memory failure following unilateral temporal lobectomy.

    David W. Loring;G. P. Lee;K. J. Meador;H. F. Flanigin

  • Wada memory performance predicts seizure outcome following anterior temporal lobectomy

    D. W. Loring;K. J. Meador;G. P. Lee;M. E. Nichols

  • Historic evolution of open cingulectomy and stereotactic cingulotomy in the management of medically intractable psychiatric disorders, pain and drug addiction.

    Alexandros G. Brotis;Eftychia Z. Kapsalaki;Konstantinos Paterakis;Joseph R. Smith

  • ICAM-1 expression on human brain microvascular endothelial cells

    David C. Hess;Tiku Bhutwala;Tiku Bhutwala;James C. Sheppard;James C. Sheppard;Wei Zhao

  • Subdural electrode-associated complications: a 20-year experience.

    Kostas N. Fountas;Joseph R. Smith

  • Limbic evoked potentials predict site of epileptic focus.

    K. J. Meador;D. W. Loring;D. W. King;B. B. Gallagher

  • Amnesia After Unilateral Temporal Lobectomy: A Case Report

    David W. Loring;Bruce P. Hermann;Kimford J. Meador;Gregory P. Lee

  • Results of lesional vs. nonlesional frontal lobe epilepsy surgery.

    J. R. Smith;M. R. Lee;D. W. King;A. M. Murro

  • Clinical and Physiological Effects of Stereotaxic Bilateral Amygdalotomy for Intractable Aggression

    Gregory P. Lee;Antoine Bechara;Ralph Adolphs;John Arena

  • A novel closed-loop stimulation system in the control of focal, medically refractory epilepsy.

    Kostas N. Fountas;J. R. Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Don W. King
Don W. King Augusta University
Kimford J. Meador
Kimford J. Meador Stanford University
Gregory P. Lee
Gregory P. Lee Augusta University
David W. Loring
David W. Loring Emory University
L. Dade Lunsford
L. Dade Lunsford University of Pittsburgh
Michael L.J. Apuzzo
Michael L.J. Apuzzo Yale University
Kim J. Burchiel
Kim J. Burchiel Oregon Health & Science University
Andres M. Lozano
Andres M. Lozano University of Toronto
Marwan Hariz
Marwan Hariz Umeå University
Ali R. Rezai
Ali R. Rezai West Virginia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience can open the door to diverse online degree options and dynamic career paths. Many students interested in brain science consider related fields such as psychology, social work, counseling, and therapy for their studies and careers.

Cost is often a key concern, and finding the right program means weighing value and quality. If you’re exploring your options, looking into psychology degree cost can help you compare tuition and financial investment across accredited programs.

For those passionate about helping others through clinical work, there are flexible online alternatives. Some of the msw programs are distance-based and have more accessible admissions, making it easier for career-changers or nontraditional students to enter the social work field.

Higher-level professional roles, such as licensed psychologist, require advanced credentials. See the best online psyd programs if you want to pursue clinical psychology with the convenience of remote learning.

Interested in working directly with families and couples? Accelerated pathways are available—some of the accelerated marriage and family therapy programs offer fast-tracked options for earning your degree and starting your practice sooner.

These options can all complement neuroscience and provide unique career opportunities in mental health, therapy, and research.

Best Scientists Citing Joseph R. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles