World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
83
Citations
27397
World Ranking
15530
National Ranking
7830

Kim J. Burchiel publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kim J. Burchiel sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 509 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Kim J. Burchiel D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kim J. Burchiel sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kim J. Burchiel is affiliated with Oregon Health & Science University in the United States. Their research spans medicine with a focus on neurology and related subfields, covering a broad range of neurological disorders, neural engineering, and treatment approaches.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Neurology
  • Physiology
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health

Burchiel's research topics encompass:

  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Adipose Tissue and Metabolism
  • Diet and metabolism studies
  • Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders

The body of recent published research includes the following papers:

  • Verification of the Deep Brain Stimulation Electrode Position Using Intraoperative Electromagnetic Localization, 2020, Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery
  • Neurosurgery residency and fellowship education in the United States: 2 decades of system development by the One Neurosurgery Summit organizations, 2021, Journal of neurosurgery
  • Predictors of multi-domain cognitive decline following DBS for treatment of Parkinson's disease, 2021, Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
  • Identifying the therapeutic zone in globus pallidus deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease, 2022, Journal of neurosurgery
  • The Long-Term Outcome of Radiofrequency Ablation in Multiple Sclerosis-Related Symptomatic Trigeminal Neuralgia, 2022, Neurosurgery

Burchiel frequently publishes in several venues including:

  • Neurosurgery
  • Journal of neurosurgery
  • Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery
  • Neurology
  • Neurosurgical FOCUS

The scientist collaborates regularly with multiple co-authors, among whom are:

  • William J. Marks
  • Frances M. Weaver
  • Matthew Stern
  • Kenneth A. Follett
  • Domenic J. Reda

Best Publications

  • Bilateral Deep Brain Stimulation vs Best Medical Therapy for Patients With Advanced Parkinson Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Frances M. Weaver;Frances M. Weaver;Kenneth Follett;Matthew Stern;Matthew Stern;Kwan Hur

  • Pallidal versus subthalamic deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease.

    Kenneth A. Follett;Kenneth A. Follett;Frances M. Weaver;Matthew Stern;Kwan Hur

  • Randomized controlled trial of intraputamenal glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor infusion in Parkinson disease.

    Anthony E. Lang;Steven Gill;Nik K. Patel;Andres Lozano

  • Randomized, double-blind trial of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) in PD

    J.G. Nutt;K.J. Burchiel;C.L. Comella;J. Jankovic

  • Practice Parameter: The diagnostic evaluation and treatment of trigeminal neuralgia (an evidence-based review) Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the European Federation of Neurological Societies

    G. Gronseth;G. Cruccu;J. Alksne;C. Argoff

  • Pallidal vs Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson Disease

    Valerie C. Anderson;Kim J. Burchiel;Penelope Hogarth;Jacques Favre

  • AAN-EFNS guidelines on trigeminal neuralgia management.

    G. Cruccu;G. Gronseth;J. Alksne;C. Argoff

  • Randomized trial of deep brain stimulation for Parkinson disease: thirty-six-month outcomes.

    Frances M. Weaver;Frances M. Weaver;Kenneth A. Follett;Matthew B. Stern;Matthew B. Stern;Ping Luo

  • Intrathecal baclofen for intractable spasticity of spinal origin: results of a long-term multicenter study

    Robert J. Coffey;David Cahill;William Steers;T. S. Park

  • Comparison of pallidal and subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for advanced Parkinson's disease: results of a randomized, blinded pilot study.

    Kim J. Burchiel;Valerie C. Anderson;Jacques Favre;John P. Hammerstad

  • A new classification for facial pain.

    Kim J Burchiel

  • Prospective, multicenter study of spinal cord stimulation for relief of chronic back and extremity pain.

    Kim J. Burchiel;Valerie C. Anderson;Frederick D. Brown;Richard G. Fessler

  • Microvascular decompression surgery in the United States, 1996 to 2000: mortality rates, morbidity rates, and the effects of hospital and surgeon volumes.

    Steven N. Kalkanis;Emad N. Eskandar;Bob S. Carter;Fred G. Barker

  • Long-term efficacy of microvascular decompression in trigeminal neuralgia

    Kim J. Burchiel;Hadley Clarke;Michael Haglund;John D. Loeser

  • The effect of intravenous lidocaine, tocainide, and mexiletine on spontaneously active fibers originating in rat sciatic neuromas.

    Charles Chabal;Lisa C. Russell;Lisa C. Russell;Kim J. Burchiel;Kim J. Burchiel

  • A meta-regression of the long-term effects of deep brain stimulation on balance and gait in PD

    R.J. St. George;J.G. Nutt;K.J. Burchiel;F.B. Horak

  • Trigeminal neuralgia: definition and classification

    Jorge L. Eller;Ahmed M. Raslan;Kim J. Burchiel

  • A prospective study of long-term intrathecal morphine in the management of chronic nonmalignant pain.

    Valerie C. Anderson;Kim J. Burchiel

  • Peripheral stimulation for treatment of trigeminal postherpetic neuralgia and trigeminal posttraumatic neuropathic pain: a pilot study.

    Mark D. Johnson;Kim J. Burchiel

  • Abnormal impulse generation in focally demyelinated trigeminal roots

    Kim J. Burchiel

Frequent Co-Authors

Jonathan P. Miller
Jonathan P. Miller Case Western Reserve University
James McNames
James McNames Portland State University
Matthew B. Stern
Matthew B. Stern University of Pennsylvania
Andres M. Lozano
Andres M. Lozano University of Toronto
John G. Nutt
John G. Nutt Oregon Health & Science University
Douglas Kondziolka
Douglas Kondziolka New York University
Patrick J. Kelly
Patrick J. Kelly New York University
Philip A. Starr
Philip A. Starr University of California, San Francisco
Gordon H. Baltuch
Gordon H. Baltuch University of Pennsylvania
Fay B. Horak
Fay B. Horak Oregon Health & Science University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Medicine doesn’t always mean attending traditional on-campus programs. Various related online degrees offer flexible and affordable alternatives for those pursuing healthcare fields. If you’re interested in pharmacy, an online pharmd can open doors to advanced roles in medication management and patient care.

For those drawn to healthcare administration, consider rhia certification programs online to learn about health information management and data security. If you seek quick entry into the medical field, reviewing medical coding certification cost options can help you start a career in billing, coding, and records management with minimal upfront investment.

Nursing remains one of the most dynamic pathways, and online nurse practitioner programs provide a balance of flexibility and comprehensive training for those aiming for advanced nursing roles. Each of these online pathways presents new opportunities for career growth within the healthcare sector—making quality education more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Kim J. Burchiel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles