World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 42 7255 6975 2579 2402 105 14906

Laure Resplandy publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Laure Resplandy between 2009 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Laure Resplandy published across 18 years, from 2009 to 2026, averaging 10.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 39 publications in 2023. 27 of the 190 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2009 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 39. Peak 39 publications in 2023. 2009: 2 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 5 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 39 publications 2024: 20 publications 2025: 26 publications 2026: 1 publication
2009 2026

190 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Laure Resplandy: publications per year, 2009 to 2026
Year Publications
2009 2
2010 0
2011 1
2012 5
2013 6
2014 6
2015 4
2016 9
2017 11
2018 6
2019 9
2020 7
2021 14
2022 24
2023 39
2024 20
2025 26
2026 1
Total 190
Download as CSV

Laure Resplandy publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laure Resplandy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 105 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492 105
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Laure Resplandy D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laure Resplandy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305 42
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

Laure Resplandy is affiliated with Princeton University in the United States. Their research spans across Earth and Planetary Sciences, with significant contributions to Environmental Science.

The scientist's work focuses on subfields including Oceanography, Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Environmental Chemistry, and Ecology. Key topics studied are Marine and coastal ecosystems, Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Climate variability and models, Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses, Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena, and Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols.

Resplandy has been involved in numerous publications, frequently collaborating with co-authors such as Laurent Bopp, Judith Hauck, Nicolas Gruber, Tatiana Ilyina, and Jörg Schwinger. The primary venues for their publications include Global Biogeochemical Cycles, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Earth system science data, Elementa Science of the Anthropocene, and Biogeosciences.

Recent papers featuring their work include:

  • Global Carbon Budget 2020, 2020, Earth system science data
  • Global Carbon Budget 2022, 2022, Earth system science data
  • Global Carbon Budget 2021, 2022, Earth system science data
  • Global Carbon Budget 2023, 2023, Earth system science data
  • The land-to-ocean loops of the global carbon cycle, 2022, Nature

Among distinctions, Laure Resplandy was awarded Fellowship of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation in 2019.

Best Publications

  • Global Carbon Budget 2018

    Corinne Le Quéré;Robbie M. Andrew;Pierre Friedlingstein;Stephen Sitch

  • Global Carbon Budget 2020

    Pierre Friedlingstein;Pierre Friedlingstein;Michael O'Sullivan;Matthew W. Jones;Robbie M. Andrew

  • Multiple stressors of ocean ecosystems in the 21st century: projections with CMIP5 models

    Laurent Bopp;L. Resplandy;James C. Orr;Scott C. Doney

  • Global Carbon Budget 2019

    Pierre Friedlingstein;Pierre Friedlingstein;Matthew W. Jones;Michael O'Sullivan;Robbie Andrew

  • Global Carbon Budget 2023

    Unknown

  • The land-to-ocean loops of the global carbon cycle

    Unknown

  • Consistency and Challenges in the Ocean Carbon Sink Estimate for the Global Carbon Budget

    Judith Hauck;Moritz Zeising;Corinne Le Quéré;Nicolas Gruber

  • Atmospheric evidence for a global secular increase in carbon isotopic discrimination of land photosynthesis

    Ralph F. Keeling;Heather D. Graven;Lisa R. Welp;Laure Resplandy

  • Reassessing Southern Ocean Air-Sea CO2 Flux Estimates With the Addition of Biogeochemical Float Observations.

    Seth M. Bushinsky;Seth M. Bushinsky;Peter Landschützer;Christian Rödenbeck;Alison R. Gray

  • Large-scale impacts of submesoscale dynamics on phytoplankton: Local and remote effects

    Marina Lévy;Doroteaciro Iovino;Laure Resplandy;Patrice Klein

  • Revision of global carbon fluxes based on a reassessment of oceanic and riverine carbon transport

    L. Resplandy;R. F. Keeling;Christian Rödenbeck;B. B. Stephens

  • Global nitrous oxide budget (1980–2020)

    Unknown

  • Physical and Biogeochemical Controls of the Phytoplankton Seasonal Cycle in the Indian Ocean: A Modeling Study

    Vamara Koné;Olivier Aumont;Marina Lévy;Laure Resplandy

  • Controlling factors of the oxygen balance in the Arabian Sea's OMZ

    Laure Resplandy;Marina Lévy;Laurent Bopp;Vincent Echevin

  • Physical pathways for carbon transfers between the surface mixed layer and the ocean interior

    Marina Lévy;Laurent Bopp;Pierre Karleskind;Laure Resplandy

  • Coastal-ocean uptake of anthropogenic carbon

    Thimothée Bourgeois;James C. Orr;Laure Resplandy;Jens Terhaar

  • Effects of Eddy-Driven Subduction on Ocean Biological Carbon Pump

    Laure Resplandy;Marina Lévy;Dennis J. McGillicuddy

  • Inconsistent strategies to spin up models in CMIP5: implications for ocean biogeochemical model performance assessment

    Roland Séférian;Marion Gehlen;Laurent Bopp;Laure Resplandy

  • Contribution of mesoscale processes to nutrient budgets in the Arabian Sea

    Laure Resplandy;Marina Lévy;Gurvan Madec;Gurvan Madec;Stéphane Pous

  • Global Carbon Budget 2021

    P. Friedlingstein;P. Friedlingstein;M.W. Jones;M. O'Sullivan;R.M. Andrew

  • Seasonal and intraseasonal biogeochemical variability in the thermocline ridge of the southern tropical Indian Ocean

    Laure Resplandy;Jérôme Vialard;Marina Lévy;Olivier Aumont

  • Retraction Note: Quantification of ocean heat uptake from changes in atmospheric O2 and CO2 composition.

    L. Resplandy;R. F. Keeling;Y. Eddebbar;M. K. Brooks

  • The spatiotemporal dynamics of the sources and sinks of CO2 in the global coastal ocean

    Alizee Roobaert;Goulven Laruelle;Laure Resplandy;Peter Landschützer

Frequent Co-Authors

Laurent Bopp
Laurent Bopp École Normale Supérieure
Marina Lévy
Marina Lévy Sorbonne University
Ralph F. Keeling
Ralph F. Keeling University of California, San Diego
Christian Rödenbeck
Christian Rödenbeck Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry
John P. Dunne
John P. Dunne Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory
Roland Séférian
Roland Séférian Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Peter Landschützer
Peter Landschützer Max Planck Society
Matthew C. Long
Matthew C. Long National Center for Atmospheric Research
Tatiana Ilyina
Tatiana Ilyina Max Planck Society
Julia Pongratz
Julia Pongratz Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students exploring Environmental Sciences, pursuing complementary online degrees can broaden career prospects. Many professionals enhance their expertise through advanced education, such as the best eds to edd programs, which focus on educational leadership and research. These degrees are especially valuable for those interested in environmental education or policy development.

Additionally, interdisciplinary fields like social work play a crucial role in addressing environmental justice. Accessible options like the dsw programs offer affordable paths to leadership roles impacting community health and sustainability.

For students uncertain about their exact focus, pursuing an affordable online general studies degree provides flexibility while still cultivating critical thinking and research skills applicable to various environmental careers.

Lastly, those seeking a quicker entry into the workforce may consider one of the easiest degree to get programs, which can help students gain foundational knowledge before specializing further or gaining practical experience in environmental fields.

Best Scientists Citing Laure Resplandy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles