World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Rising Stars
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Rising Stars

D-Index
62
Citations
36579
World Ranking
142
National Ranking
2

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
63
Citations
37185
World Ranking
2396
National Ranking
91

Roland Séférian publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roland Séférian sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 159 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Roland Séférian D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roland Séférian sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Rising Stars Award

Overview

Roland Séférian is affiliated with the Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées in France. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a notable emphasis on Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography, and Atmospheric Science.

Their work covers a range of topics related to atmospheric and environmental dynamics, including:

  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Climate variability and models
  • Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate

In terms of publication venues, Roland Séférian frequently contributes to:

  • Biogeosciences
  • Earth System Dynamics
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics

Their recent papers include:

  • "Global Carbon Budget 2020," published in 2020 in Earth system science data
  • "Global Carbon Budget 2022," published in 2022 in Earth system science data
  • "Global Carbon Budget 2021," published in 2022 in Earth system science data
  • "Global Carbon Budget 2023," published in 2023 in Earth system science data
  • "Twenty-first century ocean warming, acidification, deoxygenation, and upper-ocean nutrient and primary production decline from CMIP6 model projections," published in 2020 in Biogeosciences

Several frequent co-authors have collaborated extensively with Roland Séférian. These include:

  • Tatiana Ilyina
  • Jörg Schwinger
  • Laurent Bopp
  • Jerry Tjiputra
  • Chris Jones

Best Publications

  • Global Carbon Budget 2016

    Corinne Le Quere;Robbie M. Andrew;Josep G. Canadell;Stephen Sitch

  • Global Carbon Budget 2015

    C. Le Quéré;R. Moriarty;R. M. Andrew;J. G. Canadell

  • Global carbon budget 2014

    C. Le Quéré;R. Moriarty;R. M. Andrew;G. P. Peters

  • Global Carbon Budget 2018

    Corinne Le Quéré;Robbie M. Andrew;Pierre Friedlingstein;Stephen Sitch

  • Global Carbon Budget 2020

    Pierre Friedlingstein;Pierre Friedlingstein;Michael O'Sullivan;Matthew W. Jones;Robbie M. Andrew

  • Multiple stressors of ocean ecosystems in the 21st century: projections with CMIP5 models

    Laurent Bopp;L. Resplandy;James C. Orr;Scott C. Doney

  • Global Carbon Budget 2019

    Pierre Friedlingstein;Pierre Friedlingstein;Matthew W. Jones;Michael O'Sullivan;Robbie Andrew

  • Global Carbon Budget 2017

    Corinne Le Quere;Robbie M. Andrew;Pierre Friedlingstein;Stephen Sitch

  • Global Carbon Budget 2023

    Unknown

  • Evaluation of CMIP6 DECK Experiments With CNRM-CM6-1

    A. Voldoire;D. Saint‐Martin;S. Sénési;B. Decharme

  • Impacts of 1.5°C Global Warming on Natural and Human Systems

    O. Hoegh-Guldberg;D. Jacob;M. Bindi;S. Brown

  • Evaluation of CNRM Earth System Model, CNRM‐ESM2‐1: Role of Earth System Processes in Present‐Day and Future Climate

    Roland Séférian;Pierre Nabat;Martine Michou;David Saint‐Martin

  • Technical Summary: Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty

    M. Allen;P. Antwi-Agyei;F. Aragon-Durand;M. Babiker

  • Mitigation Pathways Compatible with 1.5°C in the Context of Sustainable Development

    Joeri Rogelj;Drew Shindell;Kejun Jiang;Solomone Fifita

  • Twenty-first century ocean warming, acidification, deoxygenation, and upper-ocean nutrient and primary production decline from CMIP6 model projections

    Lester Kwiatkowski;Olivier Torres;Laurent Bopp;Olivier Aumont

  • Climate model projections from the Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) of CMIP6

    Claudia Tebaldi;Kevin Debeire;Veronika Eyring;Veronika Eyring;Erich Fischer

  • Carbon-concentration and carbon-climate feedbacks in CMIP6 models and their comparison to CMIP5 models

    Vivek K. Arora;Anna Katavouta;Anna Katavouta;Richard G. Williams;Chris D. Jones

  • Estimating and tracking the remaining carbon budget for stringent climate targets

    Joeri Rogelj;Piers M. Forster;Elmar Kriegler;Christopher J. Smith

  • Drivers and uncertainties of future global marine primary production in marine ecosystem models

    C Laufkötter;C Laufkötter;M Vogt;N Gruber;M Aita-Noguchi

  • Tracking Improvement in Simulated Marine Biogeochemistry Between CMIP5 and CMIP6.

    Roland Séférian;Sarah Berthet;Andrew Yool;Julien Palmiéri

  • Recent Changes in the ISBA‐CTRIP Land Surface System for Use in the CNRM‐CM6 Climate Model and in Global Off‐Line Hydrological Applications

    Bertrand Decharme;Christine Delire;Marie Minvielle;Jeanne Colin

Frequent Co-Authors

Laurent Bopp
Laurent Bopp École Normale Supérieure
Tatiana Ilyina
Tatiana Ilyina Max Planck Society
Joeri Rogelj
Joeri Rogelj Imperial College London
Pierre Friedlingstein
Pierre Friedlingstein University of Exeter
Andrew Lenton
Andrew Lenton Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Jerry Tjiputra
Jerry Tjiputra Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research
Julia Pongratz
Julia Pongratz Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Marion Gehlen
Marion Gehlen French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA)
Christian Rödenbeck
Christian Rödenbeck Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry
Bronte Tilbrook
Bronte Tilbrook CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences often leads students to consider related fields that complement their interests and expand career opportunities. For those wondering about study options, discovering the easiest bachelor degree to get can help identify accessible starting points in environmental education without compromising quality.

Specialized programs such as an online geoscience degree offer deep insights into earth sciences, critical for addressing environmental challenges. Similarly, colleges with a focus on technology provide excellent opportunities, with colleges with GIS programs standing out. GIS skills are increasingly vital in mapping and analyzing environmental data.

For professionals aspiring to leadership roles in environmental policy and management, pursuing an advanced degree like the best online masters in public administration can provide essential training. This blend of science and administration equips graduates to effectively influence sustainability initiatives and public programs.

Best Scientists Citing Roland Séférian

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles