World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter Landschützer

Peter Landschützer

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
52
Citations
29551
World Ranking
4352
National Ranking
299

Peter Landschützer publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Landschützer sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 120 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Peter Landschützer D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Landschützer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Landschützer is a researcher affiliated with the Max Planck Society in Germany. Their body of work primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Environmental Science, with a significant number of publications in subfields such as Oceanography, Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Environmental Chemistry, and Environmental Engineering.

The scientist's main research topics include:

  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses
  • Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Climate variability and models
  • Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols

Peter Landschützer has contributed to several recent scientific publications. Among these are:

  • Global Carbon Budget 2020, published in 2020 in Earth system science data
  • Global Carbon Budget 2021, published in 2022 in Earth system science data
  • Global Carbon Budget 2022, published in 2022 in Earth system science data
  • Global Carbon Budget 2023, published in 2023 in Earth system science data
  • Revised estimates of ocean-atmosphere CO2 flux are consistent with ocean carbon inventory, published in 2020 in Nature Communications

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Judith Hauck
  • Nicolas Gruber
  • Christian Rödenbeck
  • Tatiana Ilyina
  • Corinne Le Quéré

Peter Landschützer's work appears frequently in several publication venues. The most common places of publication are:

  • Global Biogeochemical Cycles
  • Earth system science data
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences

Best Publications

  • Global Carbon Budget 2016

    Corinne Le Quere;Robbie M. Andrew;Josep G. Canadell;Stephen Sitch

  • Global Carbon Budget 2015

    C. Le Quéré;R. Moriarty;R. M. Andrew;J. G. Canadell

  • Global carbon budget 2014

    C. Le Quéré;R. Moriarty;R. M. Andrew;G. P. Peters

  • Global Carbon Budget 2018

    Corinne Le Quéré;Robbie M. Andrew;Pierre Friedlingstein;Stephen Sitch

  • Global Carbon Budget 2020

    Pierre Friedlingstein;Pierre Friedlingstein;Michael O'Sullivan;Matthew W. Jones;Robbie M. Andrew

  • Global Carbon Budget 2019

    Pierre Friedlingstein;Pierre Friedlingstein;Matthew W. Jones;Michael O'Sullivan;Robbie Andrew

  • Global Carbon Budget 2017

    Corinne Le Quere;Robbie M. Andrew;Pierre Friedlingstein;Stephen Sitch

  • Global Carbon Budget 2023

    Unknown

  • A multi-decade record of high-quality fCO2 data in version 3 of the Surface Ocean CO2 Atlas (SOCAT)

    Dorothee C. E. Bakker;Benjamin Pfeil;Benjamin Pfeil;Camilla S. Landa;Camilla S. Landa;Nicolas Metzl

  • The reinvigoration of the Southern Ocean carbon sink

    Peter Landschützer;Nicolas Gruber;F. Alexander Haumann;Christian Rödenbeck

  • Recent variability of the global ocean carbon sink

    Peter Landschutzer;Peter Landschutzer;Nicholas Gruber;Dorothee C. E. Bakker;Ute Schuster

  • Decadal variations and trends of the global ocean carbon sink

    Peter Landschützer;Peter Landschützer;Nicolas Gruber;Dorothee C. E. Bakker

  • The Variable Southern Ocean Carbon Sink.

    Nicolas Gruber;Peter Landschützer;Nicole S Lovenduski

  • STATE OF THE CLIMATE IN 2017

    R. Abernethy;Steven A. Ackerman;R. Adler;Adelina Albanil Encarnación

  • A neural network-based estimate of the seasonal to inter-annual variability of the Atlantic Ocean carbon sink

    Peter Landschützer;Nicolas Gruber;Dorothee C.E. Bakker;Ute Schuster;Ute Schuster

  • Data-based estimates of the ocean carbon sink variability – first results of the Surface Ocean pCO2 Mapping intercomparison (SOCOM)

    Christian Rödenbeck;Dorothee C. E. Bakker;Nicolas Gruber;Yosuke Iida

  • Consistency and Challenges in the Ocean Carbon Sink Estimate for the Global Carbon Budget

    Judith Hauck;Moritz Zeising;Corinne Le Quéré;Nicolas Gruber

  • Revised estimates of ocean-atmosphere CO2 flux are consistent with ocean carbon inventory.

    Andrew J Watson;Ute Schuster;Jamie D Shutler;Thomas Holding

  • Trends and variability in the ocean carbon sink

    Unknown

  • A uniform, quality controlled Surface Ocean CO2 Atlas (SOCAT)

    B. Pfeil;B. Pfeil;B. Pfeil;A. Olsen;D.C.E. Bakker;S. Hankin

  • An update to the Surface Ocean CO2 Atlas (SOCAT version 2)

    Dorothee C. E. Bakker;Benjamin Pfeil;Benjamin Pfeil;K. Smith;K. Smith;S. Hankin

  • Global Carbon Budget 2017 (in open review for Earth System Science Data). doi: 10.5194/essd-2017-123

    C. Le Quéré;R. M. Andrew;P. Friedlingstein;S. Sitch

Frequent Co-Authors

Bronte Tilbrook
Bronte Tilbrook CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research
Nicolas Gruber
Nicolas Gruber ETH Zurich
Christian Rödenbeck
Christian Rödenbeck Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry
Ute Schuster
Ute Schuster University of Exeter
Are Olsen
Are Olsen University of Bergen
Dorothee C. E. Bakker
Dorothee C. E. Bakker University of East Anglia
Andrew J. Watson
Andrew J. Watson University of Exeter
Nicolas Metzl
Nicolas Metzl Sorbonne University
Adrienne Sutton
Adrienne Sutton Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory
Rik Wanninkhof
Rik Wanninkhof Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your expertise in Environmental Sciences can open doors to diverse career opportunities. Many students explore complementary fields that enhance their understanding of environmental systems and policies. For instance, pursuing colleges with gis programs can equip you with skills in spatial data analysis, critical for environmental monitoring and resource management.

Public administration plays a crucial role in environmental policy and sustainability initiatives. If you're interested in leadership roles, consider accelerating your career with an mpa one year program, which prepares graduates to manage public sector environmental projects effectively.

Understanding societal dynamics is also vital for addressing environmental challenges. A sociology bachelor degree online offers insight into human behavior and social systems, complementing environmental studies by fostering a holistic approach to sustainability.

For those aiming to advance in academia or leadership positions without the lengthy thesis commitment, exploring online ed d programs without dissertation might be a strategic pathway. These programs focus on practical application and leadership, useful in environmental education and advocacy roles.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Landschützer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles