World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Richard T. Snodgrass

Richard T. Snodgrass

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
74
Citations
21640
World Ranking
1496
National Ranking
781

Richard T. Snodgrass publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard T. Snodgrass sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 646 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Richard T. Snodgrass D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard T. Snodgrass sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2004 - Outstanding Contribution to ACM Award "For exceptional leadership in broadening the vision of the ACM Digital Library into a portal to computer science literature, and for service as an outstanding leader of the ACM SIGMOD community, of the Publications Board, and of the SIG Board."
  • 1999 - ACM Fellow For originating , providing leadership to, and for fundamental contributions to the research area of temporal databases, and for outstanding, wide-ranging service to the database community.

Overview

Richard T. Snodgrass is affiliated with the University of Arizona in the United States and specializes in computer science. Their research covers various subfields including computer networks and communications, signal processing, information systems, astronomy and astrophysics, and computational mechanics.

The scientist's work focuses on topics such as data management and algorithms, advanced database systems and queries, gamma-ray bursts and supernovae, astronomical observations and instrumentation, astronomy and astrophysical research, data mining algorithms and applications, and cloud computing and resource management.

Richard T. Snodgrass has published papers in a range of scholarly journals. Some recent publications include:

  • The ANTARES Astronomical Time-domain Event Broker, 2021, The Astronomical Journal
  • Have query optimizers hit the wall?, 2021, The VLDB Journal
  • Identifying the Root Causes of DBMS Suboptimality, 2024, ACM Transactions on Database Systems
  • We need to automate the declaration of conflicts of interest, 2020, Communications of the ACM
  • Partitioned storage for temporal databases, 2021, UNC Libraries

The scientist frequently collaborates with colleagues such as Sabah Currim, Young-Kyoon Suh, T. Matheson, C. Stubens, and N. Wolf, with multiple joint publications.

Richard T. Snodgrass has published in a variety of venues, regularly contributing to:

  • The Astronomical Journal
  • The VLDB Journal
  • ACM Transactions on Database Systems
  • Communications of the ACM
  • UNC Libraries

Among formal recognitions, they have received the Outstanding Contribution to ACM Award in 2004 for leadership in expanding the ACM Digital Library and for service to the ACM SIGMOD community, Publications Board, and SIG Board.

Additionally, Richard T. Snodgrass was named an ACM Fellow in 1999 for their foundational contributions to temporal databases and their extensive service to the database research community.

Best Publications

  • Temporal Databases: Theory, Design, and Implementation

    Abdullah Uz Tansel;James Clifford;Shashi Gadia;Sushil Jajodia

  • The temporal query language TQuel

    Richard Snodgrass

  • The TSQL2 Temporal Query Language

    Richard Thomas Snodgrass

  • A consensus glossary of temporal database concepts

    Curtis Dyreson;Fabio Grandi;Wolfgang Käfer;Nick Kline

  • Temporal and real-time databases: a survey

    G. Ozsoyoglu;R.T. Snodgrass

  • A taxonomy of time databases

    Richard Snodgrass;Ilsoo Ahn

  • Temporal Databases

    Richard Snodgrass;Ilsoo Ahn

  • Developing time-oriented database applications in SQL

    Richard Thomas Snodgrass

  • The consensus glossary of temporal database concepts — February 1998 version

    Christian S. Jensen;Curtis E. Dyreson;Michael Böhlen;James Clifford

  • Advanced Database Systems

    Carlo Zaniolo;Stefano Ceri;Christos Faloutsos;Richard Thomas Snodgrass

  • Temporal data management

    C.S. Jensen;R.T. Snodgrass

  • Web Services Business Process Execution Language

    Unknown

  • Web Data Mining

    Unknown

  • TSQL2 language specification

    Richard Thomas Snodgrass;Ilsoo Ahn;Gadi Ariav;Don Batory

  • Temporal Databases

    Richard Snodgrass;Christian Jensen

  • Evaluation of relational algebras incorporating the time dimension in databases

    L. Edwin McKenzie;Richard Thomas Snodgrass

  • A Taxonomy of Time in Databases.

    Richard T. Snodgrass;Ilsoo Ahn

  • A Glossary of Time Granularity Concepts

    Claudio Bettini;Curtis E. Dyreson;William S. Evans;Richard T. Snodgrass

  • A relational approach to monitoring complex systems

    Richard Snodgrass

  • On the semantics of “now” in databases

    James Clifford;Curtis Dyreson;Tomás Isakowitz;Christian S. Jensen

  • A taxonomy of time in databases

    Richard Snodgrass;Ilsoo Ahn

  • Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases

    Peter M. G. Apers;Paolo Atzeni;Stefano Ceri;Stefano Paraboschi

  • The temporal query language TQuel

    Richard Snodgrass

Frequent Co-Authors

Christian S. Jensen
Christian S. Jensen Aalborg University
John F. Roddick
John F. Roddick Flinders University
Arie Segev
Arie Segev University of California, Berkeley
Stefano Ceri
Stefano Ceri Polytechnic University of Milan
Saumya K. Debray
Saumya K. Debray University of Arizona
Ramez Elmasri
Ramez Elmasri The University of Texas at Arlington
Thomas Matheson
Thomas Matheson National Optical-Infrared Astronomy Research Lab
Sudha Ram
Sudha Ram University of Arizona
Barbara Pernici
Barbara Pernici Polytechnic University of Milan
Sushil Jajodia
Sushil Jajodia George Mason University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens the door to a range of online degree options and future career pathways. Students often consider specialized fields, with popular choices including data science, business, and management sectors. For those seeking advanced technical skills, some of the best data science master's programs can be pursued fully online, providing in-demand expertise for tech careers.

Management and leadership roles are also accessible through online study. Aspiring project leaders in the built environment may look to the best 2 year construction management degree online to enter or advance in construction management fields. Additionally, an mba online cheap is increasingly popular for those aiming to enhance their business acumen without breaking the bank.

For motivated students seeking a fast track, various 1 year masters options exist, offering a quick and intensive path to career advancement. Online learning makes it easier to pursue these degrees while balancing other commitments, helping students to remain competitive in today’s tech-driven workforce.

Best Scientists Citing Richard T. Snodgrass

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles