World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
John F. Roddick

John F. Roddick

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
43
Citations
9374
World Ranking
7879
National Ranking
248

John F. Roddick publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John F. Roddick sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 253 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

John F. Roddick D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John F. Roddick sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

John F. Roddick is affiliated with Flinders University in Australia. Their academic contributions are positioned within the context of this institution.

While detailed records of recent publications and specific research papers are not available, their work does not currently include a publicly listed portfolio of cited research articles, frequent collaborators, or a catalog of publication venues.

There is no specific data identifying main fields or subfields of study, nor are there listed main research topics or thematic areas of focus in their scholarship. Similarly, no information is provided regarding book publications or contributions to academic presses.

There is also no public record of awards or recognitions attributed to John F. Roddick at this time.

Best Publications

  • A consensus glossary of temporal database concepts

    Curtis Dyreson;Fabio Grandi;Wolfgang Käfer;Nick Kline

  • A survey of temporal knowledge discovery paradigms and methods

    J.F. Roddick;M. Spiliopoulou

  • The consensus glossary of temporal database concepts — February 1998 version

    Christian S. Jensen;Curtis E. Dyreson;Michael Böhlen;James Clifford

  • Association mining

    Aaron Ceglar;John F. Roddick

  • A survey of schema versioning issues for database systems

    John F Roddick

  • Survey of Spatio-Temporal Databases

    Tamas Abraham;John F. Roddick

  • Sequential pattern mining -- approaches and algorithms

    Carl H. Mooney;John F. Roddick

  • A bibliography of temporal, spatial and spatio-temporal data mining research

    John F. Roddick;Myra Spiliopoulou

  • An updated bibliography of temporal, spatial, and spatio-temporal data mining research

    John F. Roddick;Kathleen Hornsby;Myra Spiliopoulou

  • A Parallel Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm with Communication Strategies

    Jui-Fang Chang;Shu-Chuan Chu;John F Roddick;Jeng-Shyang Pan

  • TSQL2 language specification

    Richard Thomas Snodgrass;Ilsoo Ahn;Gadi Ariav;Don Batory

  • Ant colony system with communication strategies

    Shu-Chuan Chu;John F. Roddick;Jeng-Shyang Pan

  • An Efficient Scheme for Detecting Copy-move Forged Images by Local Binary Patterns.

    Leida Li;Shushang Li;Hancheng Zhu;Shu-Chuan Chu

  • ARMADA - An algorithm for discovering richer relative temporal association rules from interval-based data

    Edi Winarko;John F. Roddick

  • Schema evolution in database systems: an annotated bibliography

    John F. Roddick

  • An Evaluation of HTM and LSTM for Short-Term Arterial Traffic Flow Prediction

    Jonathan Mackenzie;John F. Roddick;Rocco Zito

  • Exploratory medical knowledge discovery: experiences and issues

    John F. Roddick;Peter Fule;Warwick J. Graco

  • Overview of algorithms for Swarm intelligence

    Shu-Chuan Chu;Hsiang-Cheh Huang;John F. Roddick;Jeng-Shyang Pan

  • Detecting privacy and ethical sensitivity in data mining results

    Peter Fule;John F. Roddick

  • Geographic Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery

    John F. Roddick;Brian G. Lees

  • Proceedings of the 12th Australasian database conference

    Maria E. Orlowska;John F. Roddick

  • Advances in Spatial and Temporal Databases

    Thanasis Hadzilacos;Yannis Manolopoulos;John Roddick;Yannis Theodoridis

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeng-Shyang Pan
Jeng-Shyang Pan Shandong University of Science and Technology
Richard T. Snodgrass
Richard T. Snodgrass University of Arizona
Myra Spiliopoulou
Myra Spiliopoulou Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Christian S. Jensen
Christian S. Jensen Aalborg University
Ramez Elmasri
Ramez Elmasri The University of Texas at Arlington
Sushil Jajodia
Sushil Jajodia George Mason University
Mukesh K. Mohania
Mukesh K. Mohania Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology Delhi
Arie Segev
Arie Segev University of California, Berkeley
Barbara Pernici
Barbara Pernici Polytechnic University of Milan
Peng Cheng
Peng Cheng Zhejiang University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring opportunities beyond a traditional Computer Science degree can open doors to diverse tech careers. Many students consider degrees in related fields such as data science, physics, or engineering. With the rise of remote learning, options like an online bachelor's degree in physics offer flexible pathways for those interested in foundational science and its application in technology.

Affordability is a key concern for prospective students. Those looking to specialize in analytics may seek the cheapest data science degree programs, which blend computer science and statistics for high-demand careers. Alternatively, technical fields like engineering remain popular; prospective engineers can compare electrical engineering online tuition costs when evaluating program value.

For those seeking a quicker route into the workforce, pursuing easy certifications that pay well is a practical choice. Online tech certifications can boost your resume and lead to lucrative job opportunities, sometimes in less time and for less money than a full degree.

Best Scientists Citing John F. Roddick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles