World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
17235
World Ranking
9480
National Ranking
4013

Ramez Elmasri publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ramez Elmasri sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 216 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ramez Elmasri D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ramez Elmasri sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ramez Elmasri is affiliated with The University of Texas at Arlington in the United States. The research portfolio reflects an active engagement in multiple areas of computer science and its applications, particularly in artificial intelligence and data management.

The scientist's recent publications span topics such as spatial, temporal, and spatio-temporal databases, the involvement of circular RNAs in cancer research, fairness in AI prediction models, and software system code analysis. Notable recent papers include:

  • "A survey on spatial, temporal, and spatio-temporal database research and an original example of relevant applications using SQL ecosystem and deep learning" (2020) published in the Journal of Information and Telecommunication
  • "Involvement of CircRNAs in regulating The "New Generation of Cancer Hallmarks": A Special Depiction on Hepatocellular Carcinoma" (2024) published in Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
  • "Using Bias Parity Score to Find Feature-Rich Models with Least Relative Bias" (2020) published in Technologies
  • "A survey of problematic database code fragments in software systems" (2021) published in Engineering Reports
  • "Increasing Fairness in Predictions Using Bias Parity Score Based Loss Function Regularization" (2023) published in the Proceedings of the International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Ramez Elmasri include Bhanu Jain, Manfred Huber, Kulsawasd Jitkajornwanich, Neelabh Pant, and Mohammadhani Fouladgar.

Publication venues regularly include:

  • Journal of Information and Telecommunication
  • Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
  • Technologies
  • Engineering Reports
  • Proceedings of the International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference

The main fields of study encompass computer science and social sciences, with subfields such as artificial intelligence, safety research, signal processing, cancer research, and computer networks and communications. The research has also focused on specific topics, which include:

  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Data Management and Algorithms
  • Geographic Information Systems Studies
  • Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
  • Circular RNAs in diseases
  • MicroRNA in disease regulation

Best Publications

  • Fundamentals of Database Systems

    Ramez A. Elmasri;Shamkant B. Navathe

  • A consensus glossary of temporal database concepts

    Curtis Dyreson;Fabio Grandi;Wolfgang Käfer;Nick Kline

  • Fundamentals of Database Systems, 5th Edition

    Ramez Elmasri;Shamkant B. Navathe

  • A theory of attributed equivalence in databases with application to schema integration

    J.A. Larson;S.B. Navathe;R. Elmasri

  • The consensus glossary of temporal database concepts — February 1998 version

    Christian S. Jensen;Curtis E. Dyreson;Michael Böhlen;James Clifford

  • The category concept: an extension to the entity-relationship model

    R. Elmasri;J. Weeldreyer;A. Hevner

  • Fundamentals of database systems (2nd ed.)

    Ramez Elmasri;Shamkant B. Navathe

  • TSQL2 language specification

    Richard Thomas Snodgrass;Ilsoo Ahn;Gadi Ariav;Don Batory

  • The Time Index: An Access Structure for Temporal Data

    Ramez Elmasri;Gene T. J. Wuu;Yeong-Joon Kim

  • A temporal model and query language for ER databases

    R. Elmasri;G.T.J. Wuu

  • Fundamentals of Database Systems with Cdrom and Book

    Shamkant B. Navathe;Ramez A. Elmasri

  • Optimizing clustering algorithm in mobile ad hoc networks using genetic algorithmic approach

    D. Turgut;S.K. Das;R. Elmasri;B. Turgut

  • A graphical data manipulation language for an extended entity-relationship model

    B. Czejdo;R. Elmasri;M. Rusinkiewicz;D.W. Embley

  • Time index access structure for temporal databases having concurrent multiple versions

    Ramez A. Elmasri;Tzyh-Jain G. Wuu

  • Scalable deep traffic flow neural networks for urban traffic congestion prediction

    Mohammadhani Fouladgar;Mostafa Parchami;Ramez Elmasri;Amir Ghaderi

  • Database Systems

    Shamkant B. Navathe;Ramez Elmasri

  • Querying Knowledge Graphs by Example Entity Tuples

    Nandish Jayaram;Arijit Khan;Chengkai Li;Xifeng Yan

  • GQBE: Querying knowledge graphs by example entity tuples

    Nandish Jayaram;Mahesh Gupta;Arijit Khan;Chengkai Li

  • GORDAS: A Formal High-Level Query Language for the Entity-Relationship Model

    Ramez Elmasri;Gio Wiederhold

  • Towards an infrastructure for temporal databases: report of an invitational ARPA/NSF workshop

    Niki Pissinou;Richard Thomas Snodgrass;Ramez Elmasri;Inderpal S. Mumick

  • A Temporal Model and Query Language for EER Databases.

    Ramez Elmasri;Gene T. J. Wuu;Vram Kouramajian

Frequent Co-Authors

Shamkant B. Navathe
Shamkant B. Navathe Georgia Institute of Technology
John F. Roddick
John F. Roddick Flinders University
Gio Wiederhold
Gio Wiederhold Stanford University
Richard T. Snodgrass
Richard T. Snodgrass University of Arizona
Christian S. Jensen
Christian S. Jensen Aalborg University
Arie Segev
Arie Segev University of California, Berkeley
Xifeng Yan
Xifeng Yan University of California, Santa Barbara
Don Batory
Don Batory The University of Texas at Austin
David W. Embley
David W. Embley Brigham Young University
Vojislav B. Misic
Vojislav B. Misic Toronto Metropolitan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science opens doors to various degrees and career options in the USA. Today, many students seek flexible and affordable online options that fit their career goals and lifestyles. If you're just starting, comparing the best degrees can help you identify which programs offer strong job prospects and earning potential in technology and related fields.

For those interested in advanced study, there are also easy masters programs to get into that provide a practical path toward specialized knowledge in computer science and IT without overly competitive admission requirements. Doctoral candidates can look into the most affordable online doctoral programs and gain advanced expertise while minimizing the financial burden.

Time is another important consideration. If you want to fast-track your education, the quickest edd program options can help you earn your qualification faster and accelerate your path into leadership or research roles. Weighing these factors will help you navigate your own journey in computer science or related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Ramez Elmasri

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles