World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
65
Citations
22671
World Ranking
2416
National Ranking
1210

Gio Wiederhold publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gio Wiederhold sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 313 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Gio Wiederhold D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gio Wiederhold sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1995 - ACM Fellow For seminal contributions to our understanding and use of database management systems and medical informatics, and for outstanding service to the computer science community.
  • 1992 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to database management and artificial intelligence technology applications.

Overview

Gio Wiederhold is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Economics, Econometrics and Finance, as well as Business, Management and Accounting. Within these broad areas, Wiederhold's work focuses particularly on subfields including Economics and Econometrics and Accounting.

The scientist's main topics of research include:

  • Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
  • Taxation and Compliance Studies
  • Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth

Wiederhold's scholarly output has contributed to the academic discourse on taxation and economic policy, covering various aspects of taxation compliance and the impact of fiscal policies on growth.

Recognition for their work includes prestigious fellowships from major professional organizations. In 1992, Wiederhold was named an IEEE Fellow for contributions to database management and artificial intelligence technology applications. Later, in 1995, they received the ACM Fellow award, acknowledging seminal contributions to database management systems and medical informatics, alongside service to the computer science community.

Best Publications

  • Mediators in the architecture of future information systems

    G. Wiederhold

  • SIMPLIcity: semantics-sensitive integrated matching for picture libraries

    J.Z. Wang;Jia Li;G. Wiederhold

  • A consensus glossary of temporal database concepts

    Curtis Dyreson;Fabio Grandi;Wolfgang Käfer;Nick Kline

  • Vertical partitioning algorithms for database design

    S Navathe;S Ceri;G Wiederhold;J Dou

  • Database design

    Gio C. Wiederhold

  • A graph-oriented model for articulation of ontology interdependencies

    Prasenjit Mitra;Gio Wiederhold;Martin L. Kersten

  • Specification of the KQML Agent-Communication Language

    Timothy W. Finin;Joseph W. Weber;Gio Wiederhold

  • IRM: integrated region matching for image retrieval

    Jia Li;James Z. Wang;Gio Wiederhold

  • Content-based image indexing and searching using Daubechies' wavelets

    James Ze Wang;Gio Wiederhold;Oscar Firschein;Sha Xin Wei

  • Medical Informatics: Computer Applications in Health Care

    Edward H. Shortliffe;Leslie E. Perreault;Gio Wiederhold;Lawrence M. Fagan

  • The consensus glossary of temporal database concepts — February 1998 version

    Christian S. Jensen;Curtis E. Dyreson;Michael Böhlen;James Clifford

  • The conceptual basis for mediation services

    G. Wiederhold;M. Genesereth

  • Toward megaprogramming

    Gio Wiederhold;Peter Wegner;Stefano Ceri

  • Read-only transactions in a distributed database

    Hector Garcia-Molina;Gio Wiederhold

  • Incremental recomputation of active relational expressions

    X. Qian;G. Wiederhold

  • Intelligent Integration of Information

    Gio Wiederhold

  • Information sharing system and method with requester dependent sharing and security rules

    Gio Wiederhold

  • Semi-automatic Integration of Knowledge Sources

    P. Mitra;G. Wiederhold;J. Jannink

  • Unsupervised multiresolution segmentation for images with low depth of field

    J.Z. Wang;Jia Li;R.M. Gray;G. Wiederhold

  • Distribution Design of Logical Database Schemas

    S. Ceri;S. Navathe;G. Wiederhold

  • A Graph-Oriented Model for Articulation of Ontology

    P. Mitra;G. Wiederhold;M.L. Kersten

Frequent Co-Authors

James Z. Wang
James Z. Wang Pennsylvania State University
Kincho H. Law
Kincho H. Law Stanford University
Jia Li
Jia Li Pennsylvania State University
Stefano Ceri
Stefano Ceri Polytechnic University of Milan
Prasenjit Mitra
Prasenjit Mitra Pennsylvania State University
Ramez Elmasri
Ramez Elmasri The University of Texas at Arlington
Stefan Decker
Stefan Decker RWTH Aachen University
Barbara Pernici
Barbara Pernici Polytechnic University of Milan
Sushil Jajodia
Sushil Jajodia George Mason University
Hector Garcia-Molina
Hector Garcia-Molina Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens many doors, but there are also flexible, affordable online pathways if you're seeking alternative routes or want to boost your qualifications. If speed is a priority, a 6 month associate degree online can be a fast way to enter the tech field or gain fundamental skills for further study.

For those interested in the management side of technology, pursuing the best online business management degree can help bridge technical knowledge with business leadership, opening up diverse career opportunities.

Budget-conscious students should look for the cheapest bachelor degree online, which makes it possible to earn a quality education without the high costs often associated with on-campus programs.

And for those passionate about engineering fields tied closely with computer science, consider a cheap online engineering degree to expand your technical skills affordably. Whichever path you choose, online programs offer versatility and accessibility for international and non-traditional students alike.

Best Scientists Citing Gio Wiederhold

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles