World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
40
Citations
4624
World Ranking
2105
National Ranking
35

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
4624
World Ranking
9446
National Ranking
152

Amir Shpilka publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amir Shpilka sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 150 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Amir Shpilka D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amir Shpilka sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Amir Shpilka is affiliated with Tel Aviv University in Israel and has made contributions to multiple fields, prominently in computer science and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their research spans a total of 55 publications in computer science and 16 in biochemistry-related areas.

Their primary fields of study include:

  • Computer Science
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Subfields of their research cover:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Amir Shpilka's work focuses mainly on topics such as:

  • Coding theory and cryptography
  • DNA and Biological Computing
  • Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
  • Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
  • Error Correcting Code Techniques
  • Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Cellular Automata and Applications

Their recent publications include:

  • "Reed-Muller Codes: Theory and Algorithms," 2020, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
  • "Reed Solomon Codes Against Adversarial Insertions and Deletions," 2023, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
  • "Reed-Muller Codes," 2023, Foundations and Trends® in Communications and Information Theory
  • "Improved Constructions of Coding Schemes for the Binary Deletion Channel and the Poisson Repeat Channel," 2022, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
  • "Optimal Two-Dimensional Reed-Solomon Codes Correcting Insertions and Deletions," 2024, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory

Key coauthors regularly collaborating with Amir Shpilka are:

  • Roni Con
  • Itzhak Tamo
  • Shir Peleg
  • Emmanuel Abbé
  • Min Ye

The prominent venues where Amir Shpilka has published include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
  • Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • Foundations and Trends® in Communications and Information Theory
  • Theory of Computing

Best Publications

  • Arithmetic Circuits: A Survey of Recent Results and Open Questions

    Amir Shpilka;Amir Yehudayoff

  • Locally Decodable Codes with Two Queries and Polynomial Identity Testing for Depth 3 Circuits

    Zeev Dvir;Amir Shpilka

  • Deterministic polynomial identity testing in non-commutative models

    Ran Raz;Amir Shpilka

  • Strong Lower Bounds for Approximating Distribution Support Size and the Distinct Elements Problem

    Sofya Raskhodnikova;Dana Ron;Amir Shpilka;Adam Smith

  • Depth-3 arithmetic circuits over fields of characteristic zero

    Amir Shpilka;Avi Wigderson

  • Testing Fourier Dimensionality and Sparsity

    Parikshit Gopalan;Ryan O'Donnell;Rocco A. Servedio;Amir Shpilka

  • Black Box Polynomial Identity Testing of Generalized Depth-3 Arithmetic Circuits with Bounded Top Fan-In

    Z.S. Karnin;A. Shpilka

  • Read-once polynomial identity testing

    Amir Shpilka;Ilya Volkovich

  • Hardness-Randomness Tradeoffs for Bounded Depth Arithmetic Circuits

    Zeev Dvir;Amir Shpilka;Amir Yehudayoff

  • Quasipolynomial-Time Identity Testing of Non-commutative and Read-Once Oblivious Algebraic Branching Programs

    Michael A. Forbes;Amir Shpilka

  • Learnability can be undecidable

    Shai Ben-David;Pavel Hrubeš;Shay Moran;Amir Shpilka

  • On identity testing of tensors, low-rank recovery and compressed sensing

    Michael A. Forbes;Amir Shpilka

  • On Sunflowers and Matrix Multiplication

    Noga Alon;Amir Shpilka;Christopher Umans

  • Locally Decodable Codes with 2 queries and Polynomial Identity Testing for depth 3 circuits

    Zeev Dvir;Amir Shpilka

  • Explicit Noether Normalization for Simultaneous Conjugation via Polynomial Identity Testing.

    Michael A. Forbes;Amir Shpilka

  • Improved Polynomial Identity Testing for Read-Once Formulas

    Amir Shpilka;Ilya Volkovich

  • On e-Biased Generators in NC0

    Elchanan Mossel;Amir Shpilka;Luca Trevisan

  • Depth-3 arithmetic formulae over fields of characteristic zero

    A. Shpilka;A. Wigderson

  • A Lower Bound for the Size of Syntactically Multilinear Arithmetic Circuits

    Ran Raz;Amir Shpilka;Amir Yehudayoff

  • Reed–Muller Codes: Theory and Algorithms

    Emmanuel Abbe;Amir Shpilka;Min Ye

  • On sunflowers and matrix multiplication

    Noga Alon;Amir Shpilka;Christopher Umans

  • Black box polynomial identity testing of generalized depth-3 arithmetic circuits with bounded top fan-in

    Zohar S. Karnin;Amir Shpilka

Frequent Co-Authors

Avi Wigderson
Avi Wigderson Institute for Advanced Study
Ran Raz
Ran Raz Princeton University
Luca Trevisan
Luca Trevisan Bocconi University
Madhu Sudan
Madhu Sudan Harvard University
Emmanuel Abbe
Emmanuel Abbe École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Yuval Rabani
Yuval Rabani Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Noga Alon
Noga Alon Tel Aviv University
Dana Ron
Dana Ron Tel Aviv University
Shai Ben-David
Shai Ben-David University of Waterloo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students studying Mathematics in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career opportunities. Fields such as data analytics, business, and marketing heavily rely on mathematical concepts, making interdisciplinary education highly valuable.

One popular option is pursuing marketing graduate programs. These programs combine analytical skills with strategic thinking, helping graduates thrive in data-driven marketing roles.

Students interested in advancing their leadership skills might consider 1 year MBA programs in USA, which offer intensive training and can accelerate career growth.

Additionally, flexibility in education is key. Many institutions allow students to transfer credits, making transfer credits for online MBA programs a beneficial option for those looking to customize their learning path.

Lastly, the rise of big data emphasizes the demand for professionals with strong quantitative skills, as highlighted in the best masters in data analytics programs. These programs complement a math background and prepare students for high-paying, in-demand roles.

Best Scientists Citing Amir Shpilka

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles