World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
75
Citations
31257
World Ranking
1755
National Ranking
1036

Eliot R. Smith publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eliot R. Smith sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 194 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Eliot R. Smith D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eliot R. Smith sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Eliot R. Smith is affiliated with Indiana University in the United States and specializes in social sciences with a focus on psychology and neuroscience. Their scholarly work spans multiple subfields including sociology and political science, social psychology, cognitive neuroscience, applied psychology, and health.

The central themes of their research include social and intergroup psychology, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, cultural differences and values, death anxiety and social exclusion, behavioral health and interventions, psychology of social influence, and emotions and moral behavior.

Recent papers by Eliot R. Smith include:

  • Positive Emotions, More Than Anxiety or Other Negative Emotions, Predict Willingness to Interact With Robots (2020, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin)
  • Human-robot interaction through the lens of social psychological theories of intergroup behavior (2021, Technology Mind and Behavior)
  • Group-Based Emotions Over Time: Dynamics of Experience and Regulation (2020, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin)

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Eliot R. Smith are:

  • Marlena R. Fraune
  • Selma Šabanović
  • Diane M. Mackie
  • Steven Sherrin
  • Ishani Banerji

Publication venues where Eliot R. Smith has published most frequently include:

  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • Technology Mind and Behavior
  • Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
  • Interaction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems
  • Religion Brain & Behavior

In recognition of their scientific contributions, Eliot R. Smith was named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2012.

Best Publications

  • Dual-Process Models in Social and Cognitive Psychology: Conceptual Integration and Links to Underlying Memory Systems

    Eliot R. Smith;Jamie DeCoster

  • Intergroup emotions: explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context.

    Diane M. Mackie;Thierry Devos;Eliot R. Smith

  • Research methods in social relations

    Charles M. Judd;Eliot R. Smith;Louise H. Kidder

  • Beliefs About Inequality: American's Views of What Is and What Ought To Be

    John A. Fleishman;James R. Kluegel;Eliot R. Smith

  • Can emotions be truly group level? Evidence regarding four conceptual criteria.

    Eliot R. Smith;Charles R. Seger;Diane M. Mackie

  • Exemplar-Based Model of Social Judgment

    Eliot R. Smith;Michael A. Zárate

  • Social Identity and Social Emotions: Toward New Conceptualizations of Prejudice

    Eliot R. Smith

  • An In-Group Becomes Part of the Self: Response Time Evidence

    Eliot R. Smith;Susan Henry

  • Socially Situated Cognition: Cognition in its Social Context

    Eliot R. Smith;Gün R. Semin

  • Mental representation and memory.

    Eliot R. Smith

  • Person Categorization and Stereotyping

    Michael A. Zarate;Eliot R. Smith

  • What do connectionism and social psychology offer each other

    Eliot R. Smith

  • Conceptualizing Social Identity: A New Framework and Evidence for the Impact of Different Dimensions

    Jay W. Jackson;Eliot R. Smith

  • Agent-Based Modeling: A New Approach for Theory Building in Social Psychology

    Eliot R. Smith;Frederica R. Conrey

  • Limits on perception of cognitive processes: A reply to Nisbett and Wilson.

    Eliot R. Smith;Frederick D. Miller

  • Beliefs about Inequality: Americans' Views of What is and What Ought to be

    James R. Kluegel;Eliot R. Smith

  • Intergroup Relations: Insights From a Theoretically Integrative Approach

    Diane M. Mackie;Eliot R. Smith

  • Social psychology, 3rd ed.

    Eliot R. Smith;Diane M. Mackie

  • Situating Social Influence Processes: Dynamic, Multidirectional Flows of Influence Within Social Networks:

    Winter A. Mason;Frederica R. Conrey;Eliot R. Smith

  • Situated Social Cognition

    Eliot R. Smith;Gün R. Semin

  • Can emotions be truly group-level? Evidence regarding four conceptual criteria: (633942013-867)

    Charles Seger;Eliot Smith;Diane Mackie

Frequent Co-Authors

Diane M. Mackie
Diane M. Mackie University of California, Santa Barbara
Gün R. Semin
Gün R. Semin ISPA - University Institute of Psychological, Social and Life Sciences
Jamie DeCoster
Jamie DeCoster University of Virginia
Myra Marx Ferree
Myra Marx Ferree University of Wisconsin–Madison
Nyla R. Branscombe
Nyla R. Branscombe University of Kansas
Robert J. Rydell
Robert J. Rydell Indiana University
Roger Giner-Sorolla
Roger Giner-Sorolla University of Kent
Margaret A. Neale
Margaret A. Neale Stanford University
John M. Levine
John M. Levine University of Pittsburgh
Shelley E. Taylor
Shelley E. Taylor University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology can open doors to a wide variety of online degrees and professional certifications. One popular career pathway is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), a highly sought-after role in education and behavioral health.

Each state and city may have unique steps and requirements for BCBA certification. For example, you can review the bcba certification requirements in Denver to understand local regulations. Similarly, those interested in Michigan can explore the Detroit bcba requirements.

Prospective BCBAs in North Carolina should check out the Durham bcba requirements for region-specific details, while students in Texas can find valuable guidance in the article on becoming a bcba in El Paso.

By researching your options, you’ll find both flexible online degree programs and local pathways that support your career goals in psychology and behavioral analysis.

Best Scientists Citing Eliot R. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles