World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
49
Citations
22559
World Ranking
5532
National Ranking
3015

Jamie DeCoster publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jamie DeCoster sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 111 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jamie DeCoster D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jamie DeCoster sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jamie DeCoster is affiliated with the University of Virginia in the United States. Their research primarily intersects social sciences and psychology, with a focus on education and developmental studies.

The scientist's work covers multiple subfields including education, developmental and educational psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, and clinical psychology. Their main research interests concentrate on early childhood education and development, reading and literacy development, parental involvement in education, educational and psychological assessments, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills, and catalytic processes in materials science.

The research output includes publications in a range of venues, with frequent contributions to Early Childhood Research Quarterly and Learning and Individual Differences. Other publication venues include the Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, and Molecular Catalysis.

Major recent papers by Jamie DeCoster include:

  • Impacts of an Early Childhood Mathematics and Science Intervention on Teaching Practices and Child Outcomes, 2020, Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness
  • Can service-learning boost science achievement, civic engagement, and social skills? A randomized controlled trial of Connect Science, 2021, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology
  • Influence of oxidizing and reducing pretreatment on the catalytic performance of CeO2 for CO oxidation, 2022, Molecular Catalysis
  • Perceptions of Emotional Functionality: Similarities and Differences Among Dignity, Face, and Honor Cultures, 2022, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
  • Validation of an instrument for assessing elementary-grade educators' knowledge to teach reading, 2023, Reading and Writing

Collaborations form an important aspect of Jamie DeCoster's research. Frequent co-authors include Emily J. Solari, Katlynn Dahl-Leonard, Carlin Conner, Delaram A. Totonchi, and Chris S. Hulleman.

Best Publications

  • Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science

    Alexander A. Aarts;Joanna E. Anderson;Christopher J. Anderson;Peter R. Attridge;Peter R. Attridge

  • Dual-Process Models in Social and Cognitive Psychology: Conceptual Integration and Links to Underlying Memory Systems

    Eliot R. Smith;Jamie DeCoster

  • Overview of Factor Analysis

    Jamie DeCoster

  • A Large-Scale Meta-Analysis Relating the Hare Measures of Psychopathy to Antisocial Conduct

    Anne-Marie R. Leistico;Randall T. Salekin;Jamie DeCoster;Richard Rogers

  • Teaching through Interactions: Testing a Developmental Framework of Teacher Effectiveness in over 4,000 Classrooms

    Bridget K. Hamre;Robert C. Pianta;Jason T. Downer;Jamie DeCoster

  • A Conceptual and Empirical Examination of Justifications for Dichotomization

    Jamie DeCoster;Anne-Marie R. Iselin;Marcello Gallucci

  • A Meta-Analysis of Priming Effects on Impression Formation Supporting a General Model of Informational Biases:

    Jamie Decoster;Heather M. Claypool

  • Best Practices for Using Median Splits, Artificial Categorization, and their Continuous Alternatives

    Jamie DeCoster;Marcello Gallucci;Anne-Marie R. Iselin

  • Effect of playing violent video games cooperatively or competitively on subsequent cooperative behavior.

    David R. Ewoldsen;Cassie A. Eno;Bradley M. Okdie;John A. Velez

  • Risky sexual behavior and substance use among adolescents: A meta-analysis

    Tiarney D. Ritchwood;Haley Ford;Jamie DeCoster;Marnie Sutton

  • Enhancing caregiver health: findings from the resources for enhancing Alzheimer's caregiver health II intervention.

    Amanda F. Elliott;Louis D. Burgio;Jamie DeCoster

  • Teacher-child conversations in preschool classrooms: Contributions to children's vocabulary development

    Sonia Q. Cabell;Laura M. Justice;Anita S. McGinty;Jamie DeCoster

  • Normal sleep in African-Americans and Caucasian-Americans: A meta-analysis.

    Megan E. Ruiter;Jamie DeCoster;Lindsey Jacobs;Kenneth L. Lichstein

  • Positive aspects of caregiving as a moderator of treatment outcome over 12 months.

    Michelle M. Hilgeman;Rebecca S. Allen;Jamie DeCoster;Louis D. Burgio

  • Efficacy of the Responsive Classroom Approach Results From a 3-Year, Longitudinal Randomized Controlled Trial

    Sara E. Rimm-Kaufman;Ross A. A. Larsen;Alison E. Baroody;Timothy W. Curby

  • Knowledge acquisition, accessibility, and use in person perception and stereotyping: simulation with a recurrent connectionist network.

    Eliot R. Smith;Jamie DeCoster

  • Variation in the effectiveness of instructional interactions across preschool classroom settings and learning activities

    Sonia Q. Cabell;Jamie DeCoster;Jennifer LoCasale-Crouch;Bridget K. Hamre

  • A new classification system for grading the severity of onychomycosis: Onychomycosis Severity Index.

    Caitlin Carney;Antonella Tosti;Ralph Daniel;Ralph Daniel;Ralph Daniel;Richard Scher

  • Characterizing the magnitude of the relation between self-reported childhood parentification and adult psychopathology: a meta-analysis.

    Lisa M. Hooper;Jamie DeCoster;Nyshetia White;Mukesha L. Voltz

  • Associative and rule-based processing: A connectionist interpretation of dual-process models.

    Eliot R. Smith;Jamie DeCoster

Frequent Co-Authors

Rebecca S. Allen
Rebecca S. Allen University of Alabama
Giyeon Kim
Giyeon Kim Chung-Ang University
Bridget K. Hamre
Bridget K. Hamre University of Virginia
Robert C. Pianta
Robert C. Pianta University of Virginia
Jason T. Downer
Jason T. Downer University of Virginia
Eliot R. Smith
Eliot R. Smith Indiana University
Patricia A. Parmelee
Patricia A. Parmelee University of Alabama
Randall T. Salekin
Randall T. Salekin University of Alabama
Robert J. Cramer
Robert J. Cramer University of North Carolina at Charlotte
David A. Chiriboga
David A. Chiriboga University of South Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens up a variety of rewarding career pathways. Many students go on to specialize in fields such as counseling, clinical psychology, or speech-language pathology. For those interested in roles that combine communication sciences and healthcare, becoming a speech-language pathologist (SLP) can be an excellent choice.

Speech-language pathologists support people with communication and swallowing disorders. Requirements for becoming an SLP vary by state and typically include a graduate degree, supervised clinical experience, and national certification. For guidance on the process, you can review steps on how to become a speech language pathologist in Utah or check out specific Vermont slp certification requirements.

Regulations and educational pathways may differ in other regions as well. Explore how to become a speech language pathologist in Virginia and discover slp requirements in Washington for more detailed information. By understanding these diverse pathways, you can better plan your future in psychology or related healthcare fields.

Best Scientists Citing Jamie DeCoster

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles