World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
6007
World Ranking
8293
National Ranking
4430

Marcus T. Boccaccini publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcus T. Boccaccini sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 156 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Marcus T. Boccaccini D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcus T. Boccaccini sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marcus T. Boccaccini is affiliated with Sam Houston State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans across psychology and social sciences, with significant contributions in clinical psychology and sociology and political science.

The scientist's work focuses on topics including:

  • Psychopathy, forensic psychiatry, and sexual offending
  • Crime patterns and interventions
  • Criminal justice and corrections analysis
  • Personality disorders and psychopathology
  • Stalking, cyberstalking, and harassment
  • Personality traits and psychology
  • Medical malpractice and liability issues

Marcus T. Boccaccini has published extensively in several academic venues. Their frequently chosen outlets include:

  • Psychology Public Policy and Law
  • Law and Human Behavior
  • Psychiatry Psychology and Law
  • Child Psychiatry & Human Development
  • Criminal Justice and Behavior

The scientist has collaborated repeatedly with several co-authors, such as:

  • Daniel C. Murrie
  • Gabriele Trupp
  • Jorge G. Varela
  • Mia M. Ricardo
  • Samuel W. Hawes

Selected recent publications demonstrate Marcus T. Boccaccini's ongoing contributions to forensic psychology and legal policy research. These include:

  • Statement of concerned experts on the use of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in capital sentencing to assess risk for institutional violence, 2020, Psychology Public Policy and Law
  • Static-99R: Strengths, limitations, predictive accuracy meta-analysis, and legal admissibility review, 2022, Psychology Public Policy and Law
  • Rater experience and the predictive validity of Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version scores, 2020, Psychiatry Psychology and Law
  • Death is different: Reply to Olver et al. (2020), 2020, Psychology Public Policy and Law
  • Forensic evaluators' opinions on the use of videoconferencing technology for competency to stand trial evaluations after the onset of COVID-19, 2021, Psychology Public Policy and Law

Best Publications

  • The Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith Questionnaire

    Thomas G. Plante;Thomas G. Plante;Marcus T. Boccaccini

  • Are Forensic Experts Biased by the Side That Retained Them

    Daniel C. Murrie;Marcus T. Boccaccini;Lucy A. Guarnera;Katrina A. Rufino

  • Rater (dis)agreement on risk assessment measures in sexually violent predator proceedings: Evidence of adversarial allegiance in forensic evaluation?

    Daniel C. Murrie;Marcus T. Boccaccini;Darrel B. Turner;Meredith Meeks

  • Psychopathy and the combination of psychopathy and sexual deviance as predictors of sexual recidivism: meta-analytic findings using the Psychopathy Checklist--Revised.

    Samuel W. Hawes;Marcus T. Boccaccini;Daniel C. Murrie

  • Reliability and validity of the Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith Questionnaire

    Thomas G. Plante;Thomas G. Plante;Marcus T. Boccaccini

  • Does interrater (dis)agreement on Psychopathy Checklist scores in sexually violent predator trials suggest partisan allegiance in forensic evaluations

    Daniel C. Murrie;Marcus T. Boccaccini;Jeremy T. Johnson;Chelsea Janke

  • Detection of overreporting of psychopathology on the Personality Assessment Inventory: a meta-analytic review.

    Samuel Watson Hawes;Marcus T. Boccaccini

  • Diagnostic test usage by forensic psychologists in emotional injury cases.

    Marcus T. Boccaccini;Stanley L. Brodsky

  • DO SOME EVALUATORS REPORT CONSISTENTLY HIGHER OR LOWER PCL-R SCORES THAN OTHERS? Findings From a Statewide Sample of Sexually Violent Predator Evaluations

    Marcus T. Boccaccini;Darrel B. Turner;Daniel C. Murrie

  • Diagnostic labeling in juvenile court: How do descriptions of psychopathy and conduct disorder influence judges?

    Daniel C. Murrie;Marcus T. Boccaccini;Wendy McCoy;Dewey G. Cornell

  • Field validity of the STATIC-99 and MnSOST-R among sex offenders evaluated for civil commitment as sexually violent predators.

    Marcus T. Boccaccini;Daniel C. Murrie;Jennifer D. Caperton;Samuel W. Hawes

  • Personality Assessment Inventory scores as predictors of misconduct, recidivism, and violence: A meta-analytic review.

    Brett O. Gardner;Marcus T. Boccaccini;Brian S. Bitting;John F. Edens

  • Describing, diagnosing, and naming psychopathy: how do youth psychopathy labels influence jurors?

    Marcus T. Boccaccini;Daniel C. Murrie;John W. Clark;Dewey G. Cornell

  • Inter-Rater Reliability of the PCL-R Total and Factor Scores among Psychopathic Sex Offenders: Are Personality Features More Prone to Disagreement than Behavioral Features?

    John F. Edens;Marcus T. Boccaccini;Darryl W. Johnson

  • Five Factor model personality traits, jury selection, and case outcomes in criminal and civil cases

    John Clark;Marcus T. Boccaccini;Beth Caillouet;William F. Chaplin

  • Differentiated Styles of Attachment to God and Varying Religious Coping Efforts

    Laura B. Cooper;A. Jerry Bruce;Marsha J. Harman;Marcus T. Boccaccini

  • Personality Testing in Law Enforcement Employment Settings: A Metaanalytic Review

    Jorge G. Varela;Marcus T. Boccaccini;Forrest Scogin;Jamie Stump

  • Screening for Malingering in a Criminal-Forensic Sample with the Personality Assessment Inventory.

    Marcus T. Boccaccini;Daniel C. Murrie;Scott A. Duncan

  • Perceptions of the Validity and Utility of Criminal Profiling Among Forensic Psychologists and Psychiatrists

    Angela N. Torres;Marcus T. Boccaccini;Holly A. Miller

  • Predicting Recidivism With the Personality Assessment Inventory in a Sample of Sex Offenders Screened for Civil Commitment as Sexually Violent Predators

    Marcus T. Boccaccini;Daniel C. Murrie;Samuel W. Hawes;Amber Simpler

  • Is There an Allegiance Effect for Assessment Instruments? Actuarial Risk Assessment as an Exemplar

    Pamela R. Blair;David K. Marcus;Marcus T. Boccaccini

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel C. Murrie
Daniel C. Murrie University of Virginia
Samuel W. Hawes
Samuel W. Hawes Florida International University
Thomas G. Plante
Thomas G. Plante Santa Clara University
John F. Edens
John F. Edens Texas A&M University
Craig E. Henderson
Craig E. Henderson Sam Houston State University
David K. Marcus
David K. Marcus Washington State University
Forrest Scogin
Forrest Scogin University of Alabama
Robert J. Cramer
Robert J. Cramer University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Kevin S. Douglas
Kevin S. Douglas Simon Fraser University
Norman G. Poythress
Norman G. Poythress University of South Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology in the USA opens doors to many related online degrees and career pathways, such as social work—a popular and rewarding field. Students passionate about mental health, advocacy, and community support often consider social work programs alongside Psychology, as both disciplines share foundational principles.

Cost plays a critical role when selecting an online degree. Fortunately, there are affordable social work programs in Seattle that provide quality education at a lower price point. For those seeking options in the Southeast, several most affordable social work degree programs in Tallahassee offer accessible entry into a growing career field.

Students nationwide can explore a list of affordable social work degrees in USA to compare tuition costs, formats, and admission requirements. Regional choices also matter; those based in the West might find affordable social work degrees in Utah particularly convenient.

These varied online degree options not only expand career opportunities in counseling, therapy, and support services but also respond to the increasing need for qualified mental health professionals across the country.

Best Scientists Citing Marcus T. Boccaccini

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles