World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael J. Vitacco

Michael J. Vitacco

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
36
Citations
5586
World Ranking
9502
National Ranking
5038

Michael J. Vitacco publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Vitacco sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 150 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Michael J. Vitacco D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Vitacco sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael J. Vitacco is affiliated with Augusta University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within psychology and social sciences, with a strong focus on forensic and clinical applications.

The main fields of study in their work include:

  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences

Within these fields, their subfields of study cover:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • Artificial Intelligence

The main topics addressed in Michael J. Vitacco's research are:

  • Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Deception Detection and Forensic Psychology
  • Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Schizophrenia Research and Treatment

Their recent published papers illustrate the specific areas of focus and include:

  • "Reliability and validity of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in the assessment of risk for institutional violence: A cautionary note on DeMatteo et al. (2020)." (2020), published in Psychology Public Policy and Law
  • "Strategies for Assessing and Preventing Inpatient Violence in Forensic Hospitals: A Call for Specificity" (2020), published in European Psychologist
  • "The PCL-R and capital sentencing: A commentary on 'Death is different' DeMatteo et al. (2020a)." (2020), published in Psychology Public Policy and Law
  • "The Use of Videoconferencing in Forensic Evaluations: Moving Forward in Times of COVID-19" (2021), published in Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice
  • "Perceived Credibility of Social Media Data as a Collateral Source in Criminal Responsibility Evaluations Using an Experimental Design" (2021), published in International Journal of Forensic Mental Health

Frequent co-authors in their collaborations include:

  • Ashley B. Batastini
  • Emily D. Gottfried
  • Craig S. Neumann
  • Rebecca J. Nelson Aguiar
  • Megan L. Porter Staats

Michael J. Vitacco's publications regularly appear in specific academic venues, demonstrating a recurring engagement with the following journals:

  • Behavioral Sciences & the Law
  • Psychology Public Policy and Law
  • Journal of Correctional Health Care
  • European Psychologist
  • Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice

Best Publications

  • Testing a Four-Factor Model of Psychopathy and Its Association With Ethnicity, Gender, Intelligence, and Violence.

    Michael J. Vitacco;Craig S. Neumann;Rebecca L. Jackson

  • Detection of Feigned Mental Disorders A Meta-Analysis of the MMPI-2 and Malingering

    Richard Rogers;Kenneth W. Sewell;Mary A. Martin;Michael J. Vitacco

  • The Antisocial Process Screening Device An Examination of its Construct and Criterion-Related Validity

    Michael J. Vitacco;Richard Rogers;Craig S. Neumann

  • Neurobiology of empathy and callousness: Implications for the development of antisocial behavior

    Elizabeth A. Shirtcliff;Michael J. Vitacco;Alexander R. Graf;J B A Andrew Gostisha

  • Subtypes of adolescent offenders: affective traits and antisocial behavior patterns

    Gina M. Vincent;Gina M. Vincent;Michael J. Vitacco;Thomas Grisso;Raymond R. Corrado

  • Reconstruing the “Reconstruction” of Psychopathy: A Comment on Cooke, Michie, Hart, and Clark

    Craig S. Neumann;Michael J. Vitacco;Robert D. Hare;Peggilee Wupperman

  • Testing factor models of the Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version and their association with instrumental aggression.

    Michael J. Vitacco;Craig S. Neumann;Michael F. Caldwell;Anne Marie Leistico

  • An evaluation of malingering screens with competency to stand trial patients: a known-groups comparison.

    Michael J. Vitacco;Richard Rogers;Jason Gabel;Janice Munizza

  • A Comparison of Factor Models on the PCL-R With Mentally Disordered Offenders: The Development of a Four-Factor Model

    Michael J. Vitacco;Richard Rogers;Craig S. Neumann;Kimberly S. Harrison

  • An examination of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act as applied to juveniles: Evaluating the ability to predict sexual recidivism.

    Unknown

  • Internal Consistency Reliability of the Self-Report Antisocial Process Screening Device.

    Norman G. Poythress;Kevin S. Douglas;Kevin S. Douglas;Diana Falkenbach;Diana Falkenbach;Keith Cruise

  • Faking Psychopathy? An Examination of Response Styles With Antisocial Youth

    Richard Rogers;Michael J. Vitacco;Rebecca L. Jackson;Mary Martin

  • Are Violent Delinquents Worth Treating? A Cost–Benefit Analysis

    Unknown

  • Contributions of impulsivity and callousness in the assessment of adjudicated male adolescents: a prospective study.

    Michael J. Vitacco;Craig S. Neumann;Angela A. Robertson;Sarah L. Durrant

  • Differential Relationships Between the Dimensions of Psychopathy and Intelligence: Replication With Adult Jail Inmates

    Michael J. Vitacco;Craig S. Neumann;Thomas Wodushek

  • Predicting short-term institutional aggression in forensic patients: A multi-trait method for understanding subtypes of aggression.

    Unknown

  • Impulsivity, anger, and psychopathy: the moderating effect of ethnicity.

    Rebecca L. Jackson;Craig S. Neumann;Michael J. Vitacco

  • Recent interview-based measures of competency to stand trial: a critical review augmented with research data.

    Richard Rogers;B S Nicole Grandjean;Chad E. Tillbrook;Michael J. Vitacco

  • Coupling of the HPA and HPG axes in the context of early life adversity in incarcerated male adolescents

    Andrew R. Dismukes;Megan M. Johnson;Michael J. Vitacco;Florencia Iturri

  • Evaluating conditional release in not guilty by reason of insanity acquittees: a prospective follow-up study in Virginia.

    Michael J. Vitacco;Rebecca Vauter;Steven K. Erickson;Laurie Ragatz

  • Emotional Experiences of the Psychopath

    David S. Kosson;Michael J. Vitacco;Marc T. Swogger;Brian L. Steuerwald

  • Evaluating the Relation Between Psychopathy and Affective Empathy: Two Preliminary Studies

    David A. Lishner;Michael J. Vitacco;Phan Y. Hong;Jennifer Mosley

  • Developing Services for Insanity Acquittees Conditionally Released Into the Community: Maximizing Success and Minimizing Recidivism

    Michael J. Vitacco;Gregory J. Van Rybroek;Steven K. Erickson;Jill E. Rogstad

Frequent Co-Authors

Craig S. Neumann
Craig S. Neumann University of North Texas
Scott O. Lilienfeld
Scott O. Lilienfeld Emory University
Elizabeth A. Shirtcliff
Elizabeth A. Shirtcliff Iowa State University
Randall T. Salekin
Randall T. Salekin University of Alabama
Andreas Mokros
Andreas Mokros Rolf C. Hagen Group
Nicola S. Gray
Nicola S. Gray Swansea University
Raymond A. Knight
Raymond A. Knight Brandeis University
Mark E. Olver
Mark E. Olver University of Saskatchewan
Robert D. Hare
Robert D. Hare University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology and counseling opens up a wide range of career opportunities. When choosing a program, students should consider factors such as accreditation, cost, and graduate outcomes. Regionally focused rankings can help guide these decisions. For example, those interested in entering the counseling field in the South may want to review the most valuable counseling master's degrees in the South to identify reputable online programs.

Similarly, students seeking education in the Northeast have options like the most valuable counseling degree programs ranking in New York, which highlights top online graduate degrees in that state.

For those interested in a broader psychology education, researching the best online psychology program rankings in Alabama can provide insight into highly regarded options in the Southeast.

Additionally, undergraduate students may benefit from considering online psychology bachelor's degrees in Cincinnati, helping them identify flexible programs that align with their career ambitions.

By carefully reviewing program rankings and outcomes, students can make strategic choices that support their long-term goals in psychology and counseling careers.

Best Scientists Citing Michael J. Vitacco

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles