World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 53 4868 4513 517 488 155 8381

Nicola S. Gray publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nicola S. Gray between 1978 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nicola S. Gray published across 48 years, from 1978 to 2025, averaging 3.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2021. 8 of the 175 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2021. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 8 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 5 publications
1978 2025

175 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nicola S. Gray: publications per year, 1978 to 2025
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 1
1992 2
1993 2
1994 3
1995 3
1996 2
1997 4
1998 3
1999 4
2000 4
2001 5
2002 6
2003 7
2004 6
2005 5
2006 2
2007 6
2008 3
2009 6
2010 6
2011 7
2012 1
2013 8
2014 3
2015 3
2016 6
2017 4
2018 2
2019 6
2020 14
2021 15
2022 11
2023 6
2024 3
2025 5
Total 175
Download as CSV

Nicola S. Gray publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicola S. Gray sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 155 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 155
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Nicola S. Gray D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicola S. Gray sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390 53
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Nicola S. Gray is affiliated with Swansea University in the United Kingdom and specializes primarily in Psychology, with a focus on Clinical Psychology. Their research spans several subfields including Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

The main topics of Nicola Gray's work cover areas such as Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, and Sexual Offending, as well as the impact of COVID-19 on Mental Health. Other significant themes include Mental Health Treatment and Access, Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, Personality Disorders and Psychopathology, Maternal Mental Health during Pregnancy and Postpartum, and Personality Traits and Psychology.

Among Nicola Gray's recent publications are:

  • The Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Mental Well-Being and Psychological Distress: Impact Upon a Single Country, 2020, Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Secondary school students' perception of the online teaching experience during COVID-19: The impact on mental wellbeing and specific learning difficulties, 2021, British Journal of Educational Psychology
  • Reliability and validity of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in the assessment of risk for institutional violence: A cautionary note on DeMatteo et al. (2020), 2020, Psychology Public Policy and Law
  • Development and psychometric properties of the Knowledge and Attitudes to Mental Health Scales (KAMHS): a psychometric measure of mental health literacy in children and adolescents, 2021, BMC Pediatrics
  • Psychological distress and resilience in first responders and health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2021, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Nicola Gray include:

  • Robert J. Snowden
  • Nicola J. Simkiss
  • Jennifer Pink
  • James Knowles
  • Chris O'Connor

The venues where Nicola Gray most frequently publishes are:

  • BMC Public Health
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Psychology Public Policy and Law
  • Journal of Interpersonal Violence
  • Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment

Best Publications

  • Gambling Near-Misses Enhance Motivation to Gamble and Recruit Win-Related Brain Circuitry

    Luke Clark;Andrew J. Lawrence;Frances Astley-Jones;Nicola Gray

  • Abolition of latent inhibition in acute, but not chronic, schizophrenics

    N. S. Gray

  • Latent inhibition in drug naive schizophrenics: relationship to duration of illness and dopamine D2 binding using SPET

    N.S. Gray;L.S. Pilowsky;J.A. Gray;R.W. Kerwin

  • Prediction of violence and self-harm in mentally disordered offenders: a prospective study of the efficacy of HCR-20, PCL-R, and psychiatric symptomatology.

    Nicola S. Gray;Charlotte Hill;Andrew Mcgleish;David Timmons

  • Abolition of latent inhibition by a single 5 mg dose of d-amphetamine in man.

    N. S. Gray;A. D. Pickering;D. R. Hemsley;S. Dawling

  • An implicit test of the associations between children and sex in pedophiles.

    Nicola Susan Gray;Anthony Brown;Malcolm J. MacCulloch;Jennifer Smith

  • Eye-movements reduce the vividness, emotional valence and electrodermal arousal associated with negative autobiographical memories

    Alastair L. Barrowcliff;Nicola S. Gray;Thomas Charles Augustus Freeman;Malcolm J. MacCulloch

  • Predicting future reconviction in offenders with intellectual disabilities: the predictive efficacy of VRAG, PCL-SV, and the HCR-20.

    Nicola Susan Gray;Suzanne Fitzgerald;John Taylor;Malcolm J. MacCulloch

  • A taxometric analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL:SV): further evidence of dimensionality.

    Glenn D. Walters;Nicola Susan Gray;Rebecca L. Jackson;Kenneth W. Sewell

  • The relationship between trauma and beliefs about hearing voices: a study of psychiatric and non-psychiatric voice hearers.

    E. M. Andrew;Nicola Susan Gray;Robert Jefferson Snowden

  • Faking of the implicit association test is statistically detectable and partly correctable

    Dario Cvencek;Anthony G. Greenwald;Anthony S. Brown;Nicola S. Gray

  • Predicting violent reconvictions using the HCR-20

    Nicola S. Gray;John Taylor;Robert Jefferson Snowden

  • Forensic psychology: Violence viewed by psychopathic murderers.

    Nicola Susan Gray;Malcolm J. MacCulloch;Malcolm J. MacCulloch;Jennifer Smith;Mark Morris

  • Relative efficacy of criminological, clinical, and personality measures of future risk of offending in mentally disordered offenders: a comparative study of HCR-20, PCL:SV, and OGRS.

    Nicola Susan Gray;Robert Jefferson Snowden;Sophie MacCulloch;Helen Phillips

  • Effects of nicotine and amphetamine on latent inhibition in human subjects.

    J. C. Thornton;S. Dawe;C. Lee;C. Capstick

  • Effects of d-amphetamine and haloperidol on latent inhibition in healthy male volunteers.

    Veena Kumari;Paul A. Cotter;Owen F. Mulligan;Stuart A. Checkley

  • Impulsivity and psychopathy: Associations between the Barrett Impulsivity Scale and the Psychopathy Checklist revised

    Robert Jefferson Snowden;Nicola Susan Gray

  • Methylphenidate treatment for bulimia nervosa associated with a cluster B personality disorder.

    Mae S. Sokol;Nicola S. Gray;Amy Goldstein;Walter H. Kaye

  • Case reports of olanzapine treatment of anorexia nervosa

    Maria C. La Via;Nicola Gray;Walter H. Kaye

  • Which schizotypal dimensions abolish latent inhibition

    Nicola Susan Gray;Michelle Fernandez;Jayne Williams;Roy Allan Ruddle

  • Implicit measurement of sexual associations in child sex abusers: role of victim type and denial.

    Anthony Brown;Nicola Susan Gray;Robert Jefferson Snowden

  • Risk Assessment in Offenders With Mental Disorders Relative Efficacy of Personal Demographic, Criminal History, and Clinical Variables

    Helen K. Phillips;Nicola S. Gray;Sophie I. MacCulloch;Julie Taylor

  • BRIEF REPORTS An Implicit Test of the Associations Between Children and Sex in Pedophiles

    Nicola S. Gray;Anthony S. Brown;Malcolm J. MacCulloch;Jennifer Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert Jefferson Snowden
Robert Jefferson Snowden Cardiff University
David R. Hemsley
David R. Hemsley King's College London
Alan Pickering
Alan Pickering Goldsmiths University of London
Andreas Mokros
Andreas Mokros Rolf C. Hagen Group
Craig S. Neumann
Craig S. Neumann University of North Texas
Steven Jones
Steven Jones Lancaster University
John B. Taylor
John B. Taylor Stanford University
Robert Kerwin
Robert Kerwin King's College London
Philip J. Corr
Philip J. Corr City, University of London
Donald R. Lynam
Donald R. Lynam Purdue University West Lafayette

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens the door to a wide range of online programs and career possibilities in the USA. One of the most impactful areas is substance abuse counseling, which combines the study of psychology with real-world application in helping individuals recover from addiction. Online degrees in psychology, counseling, or social work provide the necessary foundation and flexibility for students pursuing this path.

Educational and licensing requirements can vary greatly by location. For example, those interested in becoming a substance abuse counselor in Durham should familiarize themselves with local regulations and certification processes. Similarly, those considering becoming a substance abuse counselor in El Paso will find that state-specific coursework and supervised experience may be required.

To further understand regional differences, review resources about Fort Wayne substance abuse counselors education requirements and Fort Worth substance abuse counselors education requirements. These resources outline the variety of degree levels, internship opportunities, and licensing pathways available for aspiring counselors in their respective regions.

Best Scientists Citing Nicola S. Gray

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles