World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 84 14988 14110 7575 7013 267 29247

Margaret Rosenfeld publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Margaret Rosenfeld between 1992 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Margaret Rosenfeld published across 35 years, from 1992 to 2026, averaging 9.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2023. 24 of the 325 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2023. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 24 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 26 publications 2024: 25 publications 2025: 23 publications 2026: 1 publication
1992 2026

325 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Margaret Rosenfeld: publications per year, 1992 to 2026
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 2
1998 2
1999 3
2000 0
2001 5
2002 2
2003 4
2004 3
2005 3
2006 3
2007 5
2008 2
2009 7
2010 10
2011 14
2012 14
2013 24
2014 13
2015 17
2016 11
2017 19
2018 17
2019 18
2020 11
2021 20
2022 20
2023 26
2024 25
2025 23
2026 1
Total 325
Download as CSV

Margaret Rosenfeld publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Margaret Rosenfeld sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 261–280 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 267 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722 267
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Margaret Rosenfeld D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Margaret Rosenfeld sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003 84
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Margaret Rosenfeld is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States, with a research focus centered primarily in the field of Medicine. Their work emphasizes Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, supported by a substantial number of publications. Key subfields include Emergency Medical Services, Epidemiology, Genetics, and Surgery.

Their research covers a variety of topics, with particular attention to Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances, Neonatal Respiratory Health Research, and disorders affecting the trachea and airway. Additional topical areas include Pediatric health and respiratory diseases, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research, Respiratory Support and Mechanisms, and Respiratory viral infections research.

Margaret Rosenfeld has contributed to multiple papers in leading journals, including:

  • ERS/ATS technical standard on interpretive strategies for routine lung function tests (2021), published in European Respiratory Journal
  • Race and Ethnicity in Pulmonary Function Test Interpretation: An Official American Thoracic Society Statement (2023), published in American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor and gastrointestinal outcomes in cystic fibrosis: Report of promise-GI (2022), in Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
  • Phase 3 Open-Label Clinical Trial of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor in Children Aged 2-5 Years with Cystic Fibrosis and at Least One F508del Allele (2023), in American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • Ivacaftor in Infants Aged 4 to <12 Months with Cystic Fibrosis and a Gating Mutation. Results of a Two-Part Phase 3 Clinical Trial (2020), in American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Their frequent publication venues reflect the diversity and focus of their research:

  • Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
  • UNC Libraries
  • Annals of the American Thoracic Society
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • Pediatric Pulmonology

Collaboration is an important aspect of their research practice. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Michael R. Knowles
  • Stephanie D. Davis
  • Margaret W. Leigh
  • Scott D. Sagel
  • Ronald L. Gibson

Best Publications

  • Standardization of Spirometry 2019 Update. An Official American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society Technical Statement.

    Brian L Graham;Irene Steenbruggen;Martin R Miller;Igor Z Barjaktarevic

  • Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other predictors of mortality and morbidity in young children with cystic fibrosis.

    Julia Emerson;Julia Emerson;Margaret Rosenfeld;Margaret Rosenfeld;Sharon McNamara;Bonnie Ramsey;Bonnie Ramsey

  • Diagnosis of Cystic Fibrosis: Consensus Guidelines from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

    Philip M. Farrell;Terry B. White;Clement L. Ren;Sarah E. Hempstead

  • Longitudinal assessment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in young children with cystic fibrosis.

    Jane L. Burns;Ronald L. Gibson;Sharon McNamara;Darlene Yim

  • Failure to Recover to Baseline Pulmonary Function after Cystic Fibrosis Pulmonary Exacerbation

    Don B. Sanders;Rachel C. L. Bittner;Margaret Rosenfeld;Lucas R. Hoffman

  • Recommendations for a Standardized Pulmonary Function Report. An Official American Thoracic Society Technical Statement

    Bruce H Culver;Brian L Graham;Allan L Coates;Jack Wanger

  • Early pulmonary infection, inflammation, and clinical outcomes in infants with cystic fibrosis.

    Margaret Rosenfeld;Ronald L. Gibson;Sharon McNamara;Julia Emerson

  • Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Evidence-Based Guidelines for Management of Infants with Cystic Fibrosis

    Drucy Borowitz;Karen A. Robinson;Margaret Rosenfeld;Stephanie D. Davis

  • Gender Gap in Cystic Fibrosis Mortality

    Margaret Rosenfeld;Robert Davis;Stacey FitzSimmons;Margaret Pepe

  • Diagnostic accuracy of oropharyngeal cultures in infants and young children with cystic fibrosis.

    Margaret Rosenfeld;Julia Emerson;Frank Accurso;David Armstrong

  • Significant microbiological effect of inhaled tobramycin in young children with cystic fibrosis.

    Ronald L. Gibson;Julia Emerson;Sharon McNamara;Jane L. Burns

  • Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis: evaluation of benefits and risks and recommendations for state newborn screening programs.

    Scott D. Grosse;Coleen A. Boyle;Jeffrey R. Botkin;Anne Marie Comeau

  • Defining a pulmonary exacerbation in cystic fibrosis.

    Margaret Rosenfeld;Julia Emerson;Judy Williams-Warren;Margaret Pepe

  • Diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of primary ciliary dyskinesia: PCD foundation consensus recommendations based on state of the art review

    Adam J. Shapiro;Maimoona A. Zariwala;Thomas Ferkol;Stephanie D. Davis

  • Diagnosis of Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia. An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline

    Adam J. Shapiro;Stephanie D. Davis;Deepika Polineni;Michele Manion

  • Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of ivacaftor in patients aged 2–5 years with cystic fibrosis and a CFTR gating mutation (KIWI): an open-label, single-arm study

    Jane C Davies;Steve Cunningham;William T Harris;Allen Lapey

  • Developing cystic fibrosis lung transplant referral criteria using predictors of 2-year mortality

    Nicole Mayer-Hamblett;Margaret Rosenfeld;Julia Emerson;Christopher H. Goss

  • Efficacy and safety of lumacaftor and ivacaftor in patients aged 6-11 years with cystic fibrosis homozygous for F508del-CFTR: a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

    Felix Ratjen;Christopher Hug;Gautham Marigowda;Simon Tian

  • Pulmonary exacerbations are associated with subsequent FEV1 decline in both adults and children with cystic fibrosis.

    Don B Sanders;Don B Sanders;Rachel C L Bittner;Margaret Rosenfeld;Gregory J Redding

  • Standardizing Nasal Nitric Oxide Measurement as a Test for Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia

    Margaret W Leigh;Milan J Hazucha;Kunal K. Chawla;Brock R. Baker

Frequent Co-Authors

Bonnie W. Ramsey
Bonnie W. Ramsey University of Washington
Wayne J. Morgan
Wayne J. Morgan University of Arizona
Michael R. Knowles
Michael R. Knowles University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Felix Ratjen
Felix Ratjen University of Toronto
Kenneth N. Olivier
Kenneth N. Olivier National Institutes of Health
Lucas R. Hoffman
Lucas R. Hoffman University of Washington
Richard A. Kronmal
Richard A. Kronmal University of Washington
Jane L. Burns
Jane L. Burns University of Washington
Philip M. Farrell
Philip M. Farrell University of Wisconsin–Madison
Michael W. Konstan
Michael W. Konstan Case Western Reserve University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a future in medicine doesn't always mean enrolling in traditional, on-campus programs. There are now many online degrees related to healthcare that can help you build a rewarding career while maintaining flexibility and affordability.

For those interested in the management side of healthcare, a health information management bachelor degree online offers skills in handling medical records, data analysis, and compliance—key aspects of a modern hospital's operations.

Medical billing and coding is another growing field. Many ask: how much is medical billing and coding school? Accredited, online programs are often affordable and can prepare you for quick entry into the workforce.

Aspiring advanced practitioners can benefit from the most affordable online nurse practitioner programs, which provide flexible pathways to higher credentials and expanded clinical roles.

Finally, entry-level and registered nurses will find affordable online nursing programs that blend academic coursework with required practical experience, making nursing degrees more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Margaret Rosenfeld

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles