World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
84
Citations
27856
World Ranking
15023
National Ranking
7597

Philip M. Farrell publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip M. Farrell sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 391 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Philip M. Farrell D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip M. Farrell sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Philip M. Farrell is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medical topics related to pulmonary and respiratory medicine, as well as pediatrics, perinatology, child health, emergency medical services, genetics, and nutrition and dietetics.

The main areas of study include:

  • Medicine

The subfields of study encompass:

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
  • Emergency Medical Services
  • Genetics
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Key topics in their work are:

  • Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
  • Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
  • Tracheal and airway disorders
  • Pediatric health and respiratory diseases
  • Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Frequent co-authors during their research career include:

  • HuiChuan J. Lai
  • Michael J. Rock
  • Clement L. Ren
  • Elizabeth A. Worthey
  • Donna M. Brown

Philip M. Farrell has published extensively in venues such as:

  • Pediatric Pulmonology
  • Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
  • International Journal of Neonatal Screening
  • UNC Libraries
  • The Journal of Pediatrics

Selected recent papers include:

  • Newborn Screening for CF across the Globe-Where Is It Worthwhile? (2020, International Journal of Neonatal Screening)
  • Phenotype of children with inconclusive cystic fibrosis diagnosis after newborn screening (2020, Pediatric Pulmonology)
  • Disparities in first evaluation of infants with cystic fibrosis since implementation of newborn screening (2022, Journal of Cystic Fibrosis)
  • The Impact of the CFTR Gene Discovery on Cystic Fibrosis Diagnosis, Counseling, and Preventive Therapy (2020, Genes)
  • Detection of disease-causing CFTR variants in state newborn screening programs (2022, Pediatric Pulmonology)

Best Publications

  • Cystic fibrosis: a worldwide analysis of CFTR mutations--correlation with incidence data and application to screening.

    Joseph L. Bobadilla;Milan Macek;Jason P. Fine;Philip M. Farrell

  • Guidelines for diagnosis of cystic fibrosis in newborns through older adults: Cystic Fibrosis Foundation consensus report.

    Philip M. Farrell;Beryl J. Rosenstein;Terry B. White;Frank J. Accurso

  • Early Diagnosis of Cystic Fibrosis Through Neonatal Screening Prevents Severe Malnutrition and Improves Long-Term Growth

    Philip M. Farrell;Michael R. Kosorok;Michael J. Rock;Anita Laxova

  • Diagnosis of Cystic Fibrosis: Consensus Guidelines from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

    Philip M. Farrell;Terry B. White;Clement L. Ren;Sarah E. Hempstead

  • Consensus on the use and interpretation of cystic fibrosis mutation analysis in clinical practice

    C. Castellani;H. Cuppens;M. Macek;J. J. Cassiman

  • Brain damage induced by prenatal exposure to dexamethasone in fetal rhesus macaques. I. Hippocampus

    Hideo Uno;Lon Lohmiller;Carol Thieme;Joseph W. Kemnitz

  • Longitudinal development of mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection and lung disease progression in children with cystic fibrosis.

    Zhanhai Li;Michael R. Kosorok;Philip M. Farrell;Anita Laxova

  • Nutritional assessment and management in cystic fibrosis: a consensus report. The Consensus Committee.

    B W Ramsey;P M Farrell;P Pencharz

  • The future of cystic fibrosis care: a global perspective

    Scott C Bell;Marcus A Mall;Hector Gutierrez;Milan Macek

  • Acceleration of lung disease in children with cystic fibrosis after Pseudomonas aeruginosa acquisition

    Michael R. Kosorok;Lan Zeng;Susan E.H. West;Michael J. Rock

  • Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Evidence-Based Guidelines for Management of Infants with Cystic Fibrosis

    Drucy Borowitz;Karen A. Robinson;Margaret Rosenfeld;Stephanie D. Davis

  • Nutritional Benefits of Neonatal Screening for Cystic Fibrosis

    P M Farrell;M R Kosorok;A Laxova;G Shen

  • The prevalence of cystic fibrosis in the European Union

    Philip M. Farrell

  • Recommendations for the classification of diseases as CFTR-related disorders

    Cristina Bombieri;M Claustres;K De Boeck;N Derichs

  • Assessing Personal Qualities in Medical School Admissions.

    Mark A Albanese;Mikel H Snow;Susan E Skochelak;Kathryn N Huggett

  • The Occurrence and Effects of Human Vitamin E Deficiency: A STUDY IN PATIENTS WITH CYSTIC FIBROSIS

    Philip M. Farrell;John G. Bieri;Joseph F. Fratantoni;Robert E. Wood

  • European best practice guidelines for cystic fibrosis neonatal screening

    Carlo Castellani;Kevin W. Southern;Keith Brownlee;Jeannette Dankert Roelse

  • Standardization of lung function testing in children. Proceedings and Recommendations of the GAP Conference Committee, Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

    Lynn M. Taussig;Victor Chernick;Robert Wood;Philip Farrell

  • Cystic Fibrosis Foundation practice guidelines for the management of infants with cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator-related metabolic syndrome during the first two years of life and beyond.

    Drucy Borowitz;Richard B. Parad;Jack K. Sharp;Kathryn A. Sabadosa

  • Respiratory infections with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in children with cystic fibrosis: early detection by serology and assessment of risk factors.

    Susan E. H. West;Lan Zeng;Bee Leng Lee;Michael R. Kosorok

Frequent Co-Authors

Claude Férec
Claude Férec University of Western Brittany
Milan Macek
Milan Macek Charles University
Margaret Rosenfeld
Margaret Rosenfeld University of Washington
Gary S. Hoffman
Gary S. Hoffman Cleveland Clinic
Rebecca L. Koscik
Rebecca L. Koscik University of Wisconsin–Madison
Pippa Simpson
Pippa Simpson Medical College of Wisconsin
Benjamin S. Wilfond
Benjamin S. Wilfond University of Washington
Garry R. Cutting
Garry R. Cutting Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Mari Palta
Mari Palta University of Wisconsin–Madison
Isabelle Sermet-Gaudelus
Isabelle Sermet-Gaudelus Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The pathway to a medical career doesn’t always start and end with a traditional MD program—numerous online degrees can help you enter or advance within the healthcare field. For registered nurses looking to expand their opportunities, enrolling in an rn to bsn without clinicals program is a flexible option that lets you earn your Bachelor of Science in Nursing almost entirely online.

If you already hold a master’s degree in nursing and want to take your qualifications further, you might consider the quickest dnp program to fast-track your Doctor of Nursing Practice. For those mindful of costs, seeking out the cheapest online dnp programs can help you earn the highest degree in nursing without breaking the bank.

Aspiring nurses who wish to enter the workforce quickly may prefer a 9 month lpn program, allowing completion of practical nursing requirements in under a year. Exploring these related online degrees offers flexibility, accessibility, and varying paths for advancing your medical or nursing career in the United States.

Best Scientists Citing Philip M. Farrell

Trending Scientists