World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Social Sciences and Humanities
Spain
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 64 1094 955 9 9 287 17359

Antonio Lobo publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Antonio Lobo between 1978 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Antonio Lobo published across 48 years, from 1978 to 2025, averaging 7.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2019. 33 of the 372 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2019. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 6 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 31 publications 2020: 27 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 22 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 15 publications
1978 2025

372 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Antonio Lobo: publications per year, 1978 to 2025
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 1
1987 0
1988 2
1989 2
1990 2
1991 3
1992 6
1993 3
1994 1
1995 6
1996 10
1997 5
1998 4
1999 10
2000 9
2001 9
2002 1
2003 0
2004 5
2005 6
2006 7
2007 8
2008 10
2009 7
2010 5
2011 11
2012 6
2013 14
2014 7
2015 15
2016 17
2017 13
2018 12
2019 31
2020 27
2021 22
2022 19
2023 22
2024 18
2025 15
Total 372
Download as CSV

Antonio Lobo publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonio Lobo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 284–293 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 287 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113 287
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Antonio Lobo D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonio Lobo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79 64
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Spain Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Spain Leader Award

Overview

Antonio Lobo is a researcher affiliated with the University of Zaragoza in Spain. Their work predominantly falls within the field of Medicine, with a significant focus on Psychiatry and Mental Health. Their research output covers various subfields including Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, and General Health Professions.

Their research topics include:

  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health

Antonio Lobo has contributed to several recent papers, including:

  • "Prevalence of anxiety in the COVID-19 pandemic: An updated meta-analysis of community-based studies," 2020, published in Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
  • "Prevalence of Anxiety in Medical Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Rapid Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis," 2020, published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • "Estimating prevalence of subjective cognitive decline in and across international cohort studies of aging: a COSMIC study," 2020, published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
  • "Does individual resilience influence entrepreneurial success?," 2024, published in OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
  • "Association of Systolic Blood Pressure With Dementia Risk and the Role of Age, U-Shaped Associations, and Mortality," 2021, published in JAMA Internal Medicine

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Miquel Bernardo
  • Ana González-Pinto
  • Eduard Vieta
  • Gisela Mezquida
  • Sílvia Amoretti

Antonio Lobo's work has been published in multiple venues, with notable recurrent contributions to:

  • Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology)
  • European Neuropsychopharmacology
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Schizophrenia Research

In addition to journal publications, Antonio Lobo has contributed to book publications. One known publication is titled Human Interaction, Emerging Technologies and Future Systems V, published by Springer International Publishing in 2021.

Best Publications

  • The Prevalence of Dementia in Europe: A Collaborative Study of 1980–1990 Findings

    A Hofman;W A Rocca;C Brayne;M M B Breteler

  • Development of the EURO-D scale--a European, Union initiative to compare symptoms of depression in 14 European centres.

    M. J. Prince;F. Reischies;A. T. F. Beekman;R. Fuhrer

  • Revalidación y normalización del Mini-Examen Cognoscitivo (primera versión en castellano del Mini-Mental Status Examination) en la población general geriátrica

    Antonio Lobo;Pedro Saz;Guillermo Marcos;José Luis Día

  • The changing prevalence and incidence of dementia over time — current evidence

    Yu Tzu Wu;Alexa S. Beiser;Monique M.B. Breteler;Laura Fratiglioni

  • Validity of the scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28) in a Spanish population

    Antonio Lobo;Maria Jesús Pérez-Echeverría;Jesus Artal

  • Frequency and distribution of Alzheimer's disease in Europe: A collaborative study of 1980–1990 prevalence findings

    Walter A. Rocca;Albert Hofman;Carol Brayne;Monique M.B. Breteler

  • Dementia in western Europe: epidemiological evidence and implications for policy making.

    Yu-Tzu Wu;Laura Fratiglioni;Fiona E Matthews;Fiona E Matthews;Antonio Lobo

  • Validación de las versiones en español de la Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale y la Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale para la evaluación de la depresión y de la ansiedad

    Antonio Lobo;Lorenzo Chamorro;Antonio Luque;Rafael Dal-Ré

  • Social brain, social dysfunction and social withdrawal

    Stefano Porcelli;Nic Van Der Wee;Steven van der Werff;Moji Aghajani

  • Prevalence of anxiety in the COVID-19 pandemic: An updated meta-analysis of community-based studies.

    Javier Santabárbara;Javier Santabárbara;Isabel Lasheras;Darren M. Lipnicki;Juan Bueno-Notivol

  • Depression in Europe. Geographical distribution among older people.

    J R Copeland;A T Beekman;Michael Dewey;C Hooijer

  • The Prevalence of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Diverse Geographical and Ethnocultural Regions: The COSMIC Collaboration

    Perminder S. Sachdev;Darren M. Lipnicki;Nicole A. Kochan;John D. Crawford

  • Depression symptoms in late life assessed using the EURO-D scale. Effect of age, gender and marital status in 14 European centres.

    M. J. Prince;A. T. F. Beekman;D. J. H. Deeg;R. Fuhrer

  • Depressive Disorder and Incident Diabetes Mellitus : The Effect of Characteristics of Depression

    Antonio Campayo;Peter de Jonge;Juan F. Roy;Pedro Saz

  • Prevalence of Anxiety in Medical Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Rapid Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

    Isabel Lasheras;Patricia Gracia-García;Darren M Lipnicki;Juan Bueno-Notivol

  • [Anxiety scales and Goldberg's depression: an efficient interview guide for the detection of psychologic distress].

    C Montón;M J Pérez Echeverría;R Campos;J García Campayo

  • "INTERMED": a method to assess health service needs. I. Development and reliability.

    F.J. Huyse;J.S. Lyons;F.C. Stiefel;J.P.J. Slaets

  • Consultation-Liaison psychiatric service delivery: results from a European study.

    Frits J Huyse;Thomas Herzog;Antonio Lobo;Ulrik F Malt

  • Impact of Multimorbidity on Disability and Quality of Life in the Spanish Older Population

    Noe Garin;Beatriz Olaya;Maria Victoria Moneta;Marta Miret

  • Retinal alterations in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: an optical coherence tomography study

    Francisco J. Ascaso;Nancy Cruz;Pedro J. Modrego;Raul Lopez-Anton

  • The MATRICS consensus cognitive battery (MCCB): co-norming and standardization in Spain.

    R. Rodriguez-Jimenez;A. Bagney;C. Garcia-Navarro;A.I. Aparicio

Frequent Co-Authors

Ana González-Pinto
Ana González-Pinto University of the Basque Country
Miguel Bernardo
Miguel Bernardo University of Barcelona
Eduard Vieta
Eduard Vieta University of Barcelona
Manuel J. Cuesta
Manuel J. Cuesta Hospital Universitario de Navarra
Norman Sartorius
Norman Sartorius World Psychiatric Association
Josefina Castro-Fornieles
Josefina Castro-Fornieles University of Barcelona
Alistair Burns
Alistair Burns University of Manchester
Kaarin J. Anstey
Kaarin J. Anstey University of New South Wales
Julio Bobes
Julio Bobes University of Oviedo
Carol Brayne
Carol Brayne University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The USA offers a wide range of flexible online degree options in Social Sciences and Humanities, opening doors to diverse career pathways. Many programs are designed to fast-track your education without sacrificing quality. For those interested in social work, consider earning your degree through 1 year msw programs online. These accelerated tracks are ideal for students eager to enter the workforce quickly, while still gaining essential practical experience.

Psychology is another popular field, and you can now obtain a 2-year psychology degree online. Such programs suit individuals who want foundational knowledge for careers in mental health, business, or education.

If you wish to pursue counseling, enrolling in a cacrep accredited program is essential for licensure and advanced professional opportunities.

For those passionate about supporting families, online marriage and family therapy graduate programs provide targeted training. These programs prepare graduates for rewarding roles addressing family and relationship dynamics in various settings.

Exploring these accredited online degrees can dramatically increase your flexibility, affordability, and options for meaningful careers in the Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Antonio Lobo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles