World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
42
Citations
12247
World Ranking
19443
National Ranking
7930

Naomi L. Esmon publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Naomi L. Esmon sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 86 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Naomi L. Esmon D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Naomi L. Esmon sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Naomi L. Esmon is affiliated with the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of medicine, with significant contributions in hematology, genetics, and immunology. The main areas of study include hemophilia treatment and research, blood coagulation and thrombosis mechanisms, coagulation-related pathways involving bradykinin, polyphosphates, and angioedema, as well as the roles of neutrophils, myeloperoxidase, and oxidative mechanisms. They have also worked on platelet disorders and myeloproliferative neoplasms concerning diagnosis and treatment.

As an active contributor to scientific literature, Naomi L. Esmon has published research in several prominent venues, with frequent publications in Blood and Blood Advances. Their recent papers include:

  • Blocking human protein C anticoagulant activity improves clotting defects of hemophilia mice expressing human protein C, 2022, Blood Advances
  • Safety and efficacy of an anti-human APC antibody for prophylaxis of congenital factor deficiencies in preclinical models, 2023, Blood
  • EPCR Signaling Controls the Activity of Hematopoietic Stem Cells Independent of Coagulation Regulation, 2021, Blood

Collaborative work is a consistent aspect of their research, with frequent co-authorship alongside other scientists including Miao Jiang, Fei Yang, Yizhi Jiang, Lu Cheng, and Jingjing Han. Each of these collaborators has worked with Naomi L. Esmon on multiple publications, indicating ongoing research partnerships.

Their work spans a complex range of topics within hematology and related biomedical fields, emphasizing the molecular and cellular mechanisms of blood disorders and their treatments. The research on proteins involved in coagulation and immunity reflects a detailed examination of both basic science and potential therapeutic applications.

Best Publications

  • Extracellular histones are major mediators of death in sepsis

    Jun Xu;Xiaomei Zhang;Rosana Pelayo;Marc Monestier

  • Isolation of a membrane-bound cofactor for thrombin-catalyzed activation of protein C.

    N L Esmon;W G Owen;C T Esmon

  • Extracellular histones promote thrombin generation through platelet-dependent mechanisms: involvement of platelet TLR2 and TLR4

    Fabrizio Semeraro;Concetta T. Ammollo;James H. Morrissey;George L. Dale

  • Extracellular Histones Are Mediators of Death through TLR2 and TLR4 in Mouse Fatal Liver Injury

    Jun Xu;Xiaomei Zhang;Marc Monestier;Naomi L. Esmon

  • Thrombomodulin mutations in atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome.

    Mieke Delvaeye;Marina Noris;Astrid De Vriese;Charles T. Esmon

  • Endotoxin enhances tissue factor and suppresses thrombomodulin expression of human vascular endothelium in vitro.

    K L Moore;S P Andreoli;N L Esmon;C T Esmon

  • Complex formation between thrombin and thrombomodulin inhibits both thrombin-catalyzed fibrin formation and factor V activation.

    C T Esmon;N L Esmon;K W Harris

  • Extracellular histones increase plasma thrombin generation by impairing thrombomodulin‐dependent protein C activation

    C. T. Ammollo;F. Semeraro;J. Xu;N. L. Esmon;N. L. Esmon

  • Thrombomodulin blocks the ability of thrombin to activate platelets.

    N L Esmon;R C Carroll;C T Esmon

  • Proteolytic formation and properties of gamma-carboxyglutamic acid-domainless protein C.

    N L Esmon;L E DeBault;C T Esmon

  • The interaction of a Ca2+-dependent monoclonal antibody with the protein C activation peptide region. Evidence for obligatory Ca2+ binding to both antigen and antibody.

    D J Stearns;S Kurosawa;P J Sims;N L Esmon

  • PAR1 cleavage and signaling in response to activated protein C and thrombin

    Matthew J. Ludeman;Hiroshi Kataoka;Yoga Srinivasan;Naomi L. Esmon

  • The crystal structure of the endothelial protein C receptor and a bound phospholipid.

    Vaheh Oganesyan;Natalia Oganesyan;Simon Terzyan;Dongfeng Qu

  • Metalloproteolytic Release of Endothelial Cell Protein C Receptor

    Jun Xu;Dongfeng Qu;Naomi L. Esmon;Naomi L. Esmon;Charles T. Esmon

  • The active site of thrombin is altered upon binding to thrombomodulin. Two distinct structural changes are detected by fluorescence, but only one correlates with protein C activation.

    Jia Ye;N. L. Esmon;C. T. Esmon;A. E. Johnson

  • Infection of vascular endothelial cells with herpes simplex virus enhances tissue factor activity and reduces thrombomodulin expression.

    Nigel S. Key;Gregory M. Vercellotti;John C. Winkelmann;Charles F. Moldow

  • Disruption of the endothelial cell protein C receptor gene in mice causes placental thrombosis and early embryonic lethality.

    Jian-Ming Gu;James T.B. Crawley;Gary Ferrell;Fangjiu Zhang

  • Overexpressing endothelial cell protein C receptor alters the hemostatic balance and protects mice from endotoxin

    W. Li;X. Zheng;J. Gu;J. Hunter

  • Endothelial protein C receptor.

    Charles T. Esmon;Jun Xu;Jian Ming Gu;Dongfeng Qu

  • Structural changes required for activation of protein C are induced by Ca2+ binding to a high affinity site that does not contain gamma-carboxyglutamic acid.

    Arthur E. Johnson;Naomi L. Esmon;Thomas M. Laue;Charles T. Esmon

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles T. Esmon
Charles T. Esmon Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation
Alireza R. Rezaie
Alireza R. Rezaie Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation
Wolfram Ruf
Wolfram Ruf Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
James H. Morrissey
James H. Morrissey University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Denisa D. Wagner
Denisa D. Wagner Boston Children's Hospital
Thomas M. Laue
Thomas M. Laue University of New Hampshire
Florea Lupu
Florea Lupu Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation
Shaun R. Coughlin
Shaun R. Coughlin University of California, San Francisco
Philip W. Majerus
Philip W. Majerus Washington University in St. Louis
Arthur E. Johnson
Arthur E. Johnson Texas A&M University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your education in Biology or Biochemistry opens doors to diverse online degree options and specialized career routes. Many students interested in health and life sciences explore the best online nutrition programs, which combine biological sciences with wellness and dietetics for roles in clinical or community settings.

Those interested in healthcare leadership may consider pursuing an online Master of Health Administration. Choosing a cahme accreditation mha programs ensures your education meets industry standards and maximizes your employability in senior healthcare positions.

Aspiring nurses can compare pathways such as the dnp program no clinical route, designed for professionals seeking advanced nursing leadership roles without mandatory on-site clinical experiences.

If your goals include academia, research, or high-level management, you can opt for a research-focused phd in healthcare management. This qualification opens pathways in policy, consulting, and executive healthcare positions.

Each of these options leverages your biology and biochemistry background while giving you flexibility through online study.

Best Scientists Citing Naomi L. Esmon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles