World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
77
Citations
17039
World Ranking
4881
National Ranking
2342

Arthur E. Johnson publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arthur E. Johnson sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 150 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Arthur E. Johnson D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arthur E. Johnson sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2004 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Arthur E. Johnson is affiliated with Texas A&M University in the United States. Their academic profile is characterized by a career in scientific research within an institutional framework known for its contributions to various disciplines.

Johnson has been recognized with the distinction of Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2004. This acknowledgment reflects a formal recognition within the wider scientific community.

There are no records of recent papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues publicly available in the profile data. Similarly, there is no available data regarding book publications or specific fields and subfields of study.

The absence of detailed information on research topics, frequent collaborators, and publication history constrains a more comprehensive view of the scientist's specific academic focus. However, their position at a major research university suggests involvement in a structured academic and research environment.

No data about the scientist being deceased is recorded, so their profile is presented in the present tense. The available information situates Arthur E. Johnson as an active member within the academic community recognized for their contributions at least as of 2004.

Best Publications

  • SIGNAL SEQUENCE RECOGNITION AND PROTEIN TARGETING TO THE ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM MEMBRANE

    Peter Walter;Arthur E. Johnson

  • BiP Maintains the Permeability Barrier of the ER Membrane by Sealing the Lumenal End of the Translocon Pore before and Early in Translocation

    Brian D Hamman;Linda M Hendershot;Arthur E Johnson

  • Identification of a membrane-spanning domain of the thiol-activated pore-forming toxin Clostridium perfringens perfringolysin O: an alpha-helical to beta-sheet transition identified by fluorescence spectroscopy.

    Laura A. Shepard;Alejandro P. Heuck;Brian D. Hamman;Jamie Rossjohn

  • The mechanism of membrane insertion for a cholesterol-dependent cytolysin: a novel paradigm for pore-forming toxins.

    Oleg Shatursky;Alejandro P Heuck;Laura A Shepard;Jamie Rossjohn

  • Functional Reconstitution of ESCRT-III Assembly and Disassembly

    Suraj Saksena;Judit Wahlman;David Teis;Arthur E. Johnson;Arthur E. Johnson

  • The Cotranslational Integration of Membrane Proteins into the Phospholipid Bilayer Is a Multistep Process

    Hung Do;Domina Falcone;Jialing Lin;David W Andrews

  • Close membrane-membrane proximity induced by Ca(2+)-dependent multivalent binding of synaptotagmin-1 to phospholipids.

    Demet Araç;Xiaocheng Chen;Htet A Khant;Josep Ubach

  • Redefining cholesterol's role in the mechanism of the cholesterol-dependent cytolysins

    Kara S. Giddings;Arthur E. Johnson;Rodney K. Tweten

  • Structural insights into the membrane-anchoring mechanism of a cholesterol-dependent cytolysin.

    Rajesh Ramachandran;Alejandro P. Heuck;Rodney K. Tweten;Arthur E. Johnson

  • Only two amino acids are essential for cytolytic toxin recognition of cholesterol at the membrane surface

    Allison J. Farrand;Stephanie LaChapelle;Eileen M. Hotze;Arthur E. Johnson

  • The molecular mechanisms underlying BiP-mediated gating of the Sec61 translocon of the endoplasmic reticulum

    Nathan N. Alder;Ying Shen;Ying Shen;Jeffrey L. Brodsky;Linda M. Hendershot;Linda M. Hendershot

  • Membrane-dependent conformational changes initiate cholesterol-dependent cytolysin oligomerization and intersubunit β-strand alignment

    Rajesh Ramachandran;Rodney K Tweten;Arthur E Johnson

  • Mechanism of Membrane Insertion of a Multimeric β-Barrel Protein: Perfringolysin O Creates a Pore Using Ordered and Coupled Conformational Changes

    Alejandro P Heuck;Eileen M Hotze;Rodney K Tweten;Arthur E Johnson

  • Sequential triage of transmembrane segments by Sec61α during biogenesis of a native multispanning membrane protein

    Heather Sadlish;David Pitonzo;Arthur E Johnson;Arthur E Johnson;William R Skach

  • Role of 4.5S RNA in Assembly of the Bacterial Signal Recognition Particle with Its Receptor

    Paul Peluso;Daniel Herschlag;Silke Nock;Douglas M. Freymann

  • The Cholesterol-Dependent Cytolysins

    R. K. Tweten;M. W. Parker;A. E. Johnson

  • Real-Time Fluorescence Detection of ERAD Substrate Retrotranslocation in a Mammalian In Vitro System

    Judit Wahlman;George N. DeMartino;William R. Skach;Neil J. Bulleid

  • Beta-barrel pore-forming toxins: intriguing dimorphic proteins.

    Alejandro P. Heuck;Rodney K. Tweten;Arthur E. Johnson

  • Arresting Pore Formation of a Cholesterol-dependent Cytolysin by Disulfide Trapping Synchronizes the Insertion of the Transmembrane β-Sheet from a Prepore Intermediate

    Eileen M. Hotze;Elizabeth M. Wilson-Kubalek;Jamie Rossjohn;Michael W. Parker

  • Structural elements of the cholesterol-dependent cytolysins that are responsible for their cholesterol-sensitive membrane interactions

    Casie E. Soltani;Eileen M. Hotze;Arthur E. Johnson;Rodney K. Tweten

Frequent Co-Authors

Rodney K. Tweten
Rodney K. Tweten University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
IngMarie Nilsson
IngMarie Nilsson Stockholm University
Charles T. Esmon
Charles T. Esmon Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation
Gunnar von Heijne
Gunnar von Heijne Stockholm University
Robert E. Jensen
Robert E. Jensen Johns Hopkins University
William R. Skach
William R. Skach Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
James H. Morrissey
James H. Morrissey University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
David W. Andrews
David W. Andrews Sunnybrook Health Science Centre
Michael W. Parker
Michael W. Parker University of Melbourne
Naomi L. Esmon
Naomi L. Esmon Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Arthur E. Johnson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles