World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Molecular Biology
Australia
2026
Award Badge
Chemistry
Australia
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
113
Citations
68826
World Ranking
326
National Ranking
6

Chemistry

D-Index
93
Citations
27632
World Ranking
1815
National Ranking
48

Michael W. Parker publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael W. Parker sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 688 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Michael W. Parker D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael W. Parker sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 113 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Molecular Biology in Australia Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Chemistry in Australia Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Molecular Biology in Australia Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Molecular Biology in Australia Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Chemistry in Australia Leader Award

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Gene
  • Enzyme
  • Amino acid

Michael W. Parker spends much of his time researching Biochemistry, Protein structure, Stereochemistry, Cell biology and Glutathione. His Biophysics research extends to Biochemistry, which is thematically connected. He has researched Protein structure in several fields, including Superoxide dismutase, Glutathione S-transferase, Amyloid precursor protein, Förster resonance energy transfer and Lipid bilayer.

His Stereochemistry research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Crystallography, Tetramer and Substrate. His research investigates the link between Cell biology and topics such as Common gamma chain that cross with problems in Cytokine receptor. Michael W. Parker combines subjects such as Alanine, Cooperative binding and Transferase with his study of Glutathione.

His most cited work include:

  • Origin of the West Nile Virus Responsible for an Outbreak of Encephalitis in the Northeastern United States (1339 citations)
  • Large-scale discovery of novel genetic causes of developmental disorders (661 citations)
  • Structure and function of glutathione S-transferases (493 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Michael W. Parker mostly deals with Biochemistry, Stereochemistry, Protein structure, Cell biology and Enzyme. Glutathione, Binding site, Active site, Plasma protein binding and Aminopeptidase are among the areas of Biochemistry where the researcher is concentrating his efforts. As part of his studies on Stereochemistry, Michael W. Parker often connects relevant areas like Crystal structure.

His studies deal with areas such as Crystallography, Biophysics and Peptide sequence as well as Protein structure. His research investigates the connection between Biophysics and topics such as Membrane that intersect with issues in Cholesterol-dependent cytolysin. His research in Cell biology intersects with topics in Receptor, Interleukin-21 receptor and Cytokine.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Biochemistry (45.82%)
  • Stereochemistry (21.84%)
  • Protein structure (22.84%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?

  • Cell biology (23.69%)
  • Receptor (12.06%)
  • Biochemistry (45.82%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His main research concerns Cell biology, Receptor, Biochemistry, Biophysics and Protein structure. His research in Cell biology focuses on subjects like Monoubiquitination, which are connected to DNA Repair Pathway. His Receptor study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Endocrinology, Erythropoietin, Interleukin, Cytokine and Beta.

Binding site, Allosteric regulation, Active site, Mutagenesis and Glutathione are among the areas of Biochemistry where Michael W. Parker concentrates his study. The study incorporates disciplines such as Membrane and Cholesterol-dependent cytolysin in addition to Biophysics. The Protein structure study combines topics in areas such as Drug discovery and Dihydrodipicolinate synthase.

Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Inhibitors of histone acetyltransferases KAT6A/B induce senescence and arrest tumour growth (74 citations)
  • Inhibitors of histone acetyltransferases KAT6A/B induce senescence and arrest tumour growth (74 citations)
  • Transitional changes in the CRP structure lead to the exposure of proinflammatory binding sites (68 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Gene
  • Enzyme
  • DNA

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Cell biology, Plasma protein binding, Biochemistry, Biophysics and Protein structure. His Cell biology study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Pharmacophore, Receptor, Sialic acid and Protein subunit. His Plasma protein binding study combines topics in areas such as Inflammation, Structural biology, Complement factor I and Small molecule.

His study in Biochemistry is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Infectivity and Bacteria. Michael W. Parker has included themes like Cell, Proteasome, Membrane, Plasmodium falciparum and Proteostasis in his Biophysics study. The concepts of his Protein structure study are interwoven with issues in Regulator, Hydrolase, Cryo-electron microscopy and Binding site.

Best Publications

  • A global reference for human genetic variation.

    Adam Auton;Gonçalo R. Abecasis;David M. Altshuler;Richard M. Durbin

  • Fair Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in the Time of Covid-19.

    Ezekiel J. Emanuel;Govind Persad;Ross Upshur;Beatriz Thome

  • International network of cancer genome projects

    Thomas J. Hudson;Thomas J. Hudson;Warwick Anderson;Axel Aretz;Anna D. Barker

  • A global reference for human genetic variation

    Adam Auton;Gonçalo R. Abecasis;David M. Altshuler;Richard M. Durbin

  • Genetic diagnosis of developmental disorders in the DDD study: a scalable analysis of genome-wide research data

    Caroline F Wright;Tomas W Fitzgerald;Wendy D Jones;Stephen Clayton

  • Structure and function of glutathione S-transferases

    Matthew C.J. Wilce;Michael W. Parker

  • Replicon-Helper Systems from Attenuated Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis Virus: Expression of Heterologous Genes in Vitro and Immunization against Heterologous Pathogens in Vivo

    Peter Pushko;Michael Parker;George V. Ludwig;Nancy L. Davis

  • Prenatal exome sequencing analysis in fetal structural anomalies detected by ultrasonography (PAGE): a cohort study

    Jenny Lord;Dominic J McMullan;Ruth Y Eberhardt;Gabriele Rinck

  • Structure of a cholesterol-binding, thiol-activated cytolysin and a model of its membrane form.

    Jamie Rossjohn;Susanne C Feil;William J McKinstry;Rodney K Tweten

  • Pore-forming protein toxins: from structure to function.

    Michael W. Parker;Susanne C. Feil

  • AMPK β Subunit Targets Metabolic Stress Sensing to Glycogen

    Galina Polekhina;Abhilasha Gupta;Belinda J Michell;Bryce Jw van Denderen

  • Structure of the Aeromonas toxin proaerolysin in its water-soluble and membrane-channel states.

    M. W. Parker;J. T. Buckley;J. P. M. Postma;A. D. Tucker

  • Distinct genetic architectures for syndromic and nonsyndromic congenital heart defects identified by exome sequencing

    Alejandro Sifrim;Marc-Phillip Hitz;Anna Wilsdon;Jeroen Breckpot

  • Genome-wide and fine-resolution association analysis of malaria in West Africa

    Muminatou Jallow;Yik Ying Teo;Yik Ying Teo;Kerrin S. Small;Kerrin S. Small;Kirk A. Rockett;Kirk A. Rockett

  • Identification of a membrane-spanning domain of the thiol-activated pore-forming toxin Clostridium perfringens perfringolysin O: an alpha-helical to beta-sheet transition identified by fluorescence spectroscopy.

    Laura A. Shepard;Alejandro P. Heuck;Brian D. Hamman;Jamie Rossjohn

  • Mechanism of Activation of Protein Kinase JAK2 by the Growth Hormone Receptor

    Andrew J. Brooks;Wei Dai;Megan L. O’Mara;Daniel Abankwa

  • Model for growth hormone receptor activation based on subunit rotation within a receptor dimer

    Richard J Brown;Julian J Adams;Rebecca A Pelekanos;Yu Wan

  • The mechanism of membrane insertion for a cholesterol-dependent cytolysin: a novel paradigm for pore-forming toxins.

    Oleg Shatursky;Alejandro P Heuck;Laura A Shepard;Jamie Rossjohn

  • Mutations in LRP5 or FZD4 underlie the common familial exudative vitreoretinopathy locus on chromosome 11q.

    Carmel Toomes;Helen M. Bottomley;Richard M. Jackson;Katherine V. Towns

  • Structure of the membrane-pore-forming fragment of colicin A.

    M. W. Parker;F. Pattus;A. D. Tucker;D. Tsernoglou

  • Prenatal exome sequencing analysis in fetal structural anomalies detected by ultrasonography (PAGE): a cohort study

    Lord J;McMullan Dj;Eberhardt Ry;Rinck G

Frequent Co-Authors

Jamie Rossjohn
Jamie Rossjohn Monash University
Angel F. Lopez
Angel F. Lopez University of South Australia
Philip G. Board
Philip G. Board Australian National University
Roberto Cappai
Roberto Cappai University of Melbourne
Rodney K. Tweten
Rodney K. Tweten University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Bruce E. Kemp
Bruce E. Kemp Australian Catholic University
David B. Ascher
David B. Ascher University of Queensland
Giorgio Federici
Giorgio Federici University of Rome Tor Vergata
Colin L. Masters
Colin L. Masters University of Melbourne
Kevin J. Barnham
Kevin J. Barnham Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Molecular Biology in the USA can open doors to a variety of unique and rewarding career pathways. As the field increasingly intersects with other disciplines, many professionals explore flexible options to diversify their expertise. For example, those interested in bridging science and social advocacy might pursue a masters in human services online for a focus on community health or counseling.

Education professionals looking for change may use their teaching background to make a move from teacher to SLP (teacher to slp), gaining skills in speech-language pathology that are highly valued in both clinical and research settings.

Molecular biologists interested in applying their analytical skills to new contexts might consider an architect degree online or broaden their problem-solving expertise through a bachelor in mathematics online. These online degrees offer flexible learning for those seeking to expand or change their career while building on their scientific foundation.

Best Scientists Citing Michael W. Parker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles