World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
44
Citations
7198
World Ranking
7009
National Ranking
334

Ulrich Stangier publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrich Stangier sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 213 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Ulrich Stangier D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrich Stangier sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ulrich Stangier is affiliated with Goethe University Frankfurt in Germany, focusing primarily on psychology with a substantial publication record in related subfields.

Their work spans several subfields of psychology, including:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

The main topics studied by Ulrich Stangier cover a range of psychological and mental health issues:

  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Psychiatric Care and Mental Health Services
  • Migration, Health and Trauma

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Ulrich Stangier include:

  • Perceived vulnerability to disease, knowledge about COVID-19, and changes in preventive behavior during lockdown in a German convenience sample (2021), published in Current Psychology

Additionally, Ulrich Stangier has frequently collaborated with other researchers. The most common co-authors are:

  • Viktoria Ritter
  • Schahryar Kananian
  • Elisabeth A. Arens
  • Stefan G. Hofmann
  • Johanna Schüller

The scholar's work has appeared multiple times in certain publication venues, including:

  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Trials
  • European Journal of Psychotraumatology
  • Verhaltenstherapie
  • PsycTESTS Dataset

Ulrich Stangier has also contributed to book publications, notably with the following titles published by Hogrefe Verlag:

  • Verhaltensexperimente (2023)
  • Ratgeber Soziale Phobie (2021)
  • Wohlwollenfokussierte Therapie bei chronischer Depression (2022)

Another book published by Springer Nature is "Prozessbasierte Therapie bei körperdysmorpher Störung" (2024).

Best Publications

  • Cognitive therapy for social phobia: individual versus group treatment.

    U. Stangier;T. Heidenreich;M. Peitz;W. Lauterbach

  • Psychodynamic Therapy and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in Social Anxiety Disorder: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

    Falk Leichsenring;Simone Salzer;Manfred E. Beutel;Stephan Herpertz

  • Treatment of atopic dermatitis: a comparison of psychological and dermatological approaches to relapse prevention.

    Anke Ehlers;Ulrich Stangier;Uwe Gieler

  • Die Erfassung sozialer Phobie durch die Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS) und die Social Phobia Scale (SPS)

    Ulrich Stangier;Thomas Heidenreich;Andrea Berardi;Ulrike Golbs

  • Cognitive Therapy vs Interpersonal Psychotherapy in Social Anxiety Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Ulrich Stangier;Elisabeth Schramm;Thomas Heidenreich;Matthias Berger

  • Maintenance cognitive-behavioral therapy and manualized psychoeducation in the treatment of recurrent depression: a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial

    Ulrich Stangier;Christine Hilling;Thomas Heidenreich;Anne Katrin Risch

  • Long-Term Outcome of Psychodynamic Therapy and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in Social Anxiety Disorder

    Falk Leichsenring;Simone Salzer;Manfred E. Beutel;Stephan Herpertz

  • Screening for social phobia in medical in- and outpatients with the German version of the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN).

    Z. Sosic;U. Gieler;U. Stangier

  • Efficacy of psychological interventions aiming to reduce chronic nightmares: a meta-analysis.

    Kathrin Hansen;Volkmar Höfling;Tana Kröner-Borowik;Ulrich Stangier

  • Screening for Body Dysmorphic Disorder in Dermatological Outpatients

    U. Stangier;C. Janich;S. Adam-Schwebe;P. Berger

  • Brain activation during anticipatory anxiety in social anxiety disorder

    Stephanie Boehme;Viktoria Ritter;Susan Tefikow;Ulrich Stangier

  • Mental imagery vividness as a trait marker across the schizophrenia spectrum.

    Viola Oertel;Anna Rotarska-Jagiela;Vincent van de Ven;Corinna Haenschel;Corinna Haenschel

  • Associations between movement synchrony and outcome in patients with social anxiety disorder: Evidence for treatment specific effects

    Uwe Altmann;Désirée Schoenherr;Jane Paulick;Anne-Katharina Deisenhofer

  • Measuring adjustment to chronic skin disorders: validation of a self-report measure.

    Ulrich Stangier;Anke Ehlers;Uwe Gieler

  • Discrepancies between implicit and explicit self-esteem among adolescents with social anxiety disorder

    Franziska Schreiber;Christiane Bohn;Idan M. Aderka;Ulrich Stangier

  • Cognitive behavioral therapy of socially phobic children focusing on cognition: a randomised wait-list control study

    Siebke Melfsen;Siebke Melfsen;Martina Kühnemund;Judith Schwieger;Andreas Warnke

  • Treatment specific competence predicts outcome in cognitive therapy for social anxiety disorder.

    Denise M. Ginzburg;Christiane Bohn;Volkmar Höfling;Florian Weck

  • Baseline Patient Characteristics Predicting Outcome and Attrition in Cognitive Therapy for Social Phobia: Results from a Large Multicentre Trial.

    Juergen Hoyer;Joerg Wiltink;Wolfgang Hiller;Robert Miller

  • Discrimination of facial appearance stimuli in body dysmorphic disorder.

    Ulrich Stangier;Stefanie Adam-Schwebe;Thomas Müller;Manfred Wolter

  • Perceived vulnerability to disease, knowledge about COVID-19, and changes in preventive behavior during lockdown in a German convenience sample.

    Ulrich Stangier;Schahryar Kananian;Johanna Schüller

  • The factor structure of the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale.

    Thomas Heidenreich;Karin Schermelleh-Engel;Elisabeth Schramm;Stefan G. Hofmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas Heidenreich
Thomas Heidenreich Esslingen University of Applied Sciences
Regina Steil
Regina Steil Goethe University Frankfurt
Anke Ehlers
Anke Ehlers University of Oxford
Bernhard Strauss
Bernhard Strauss Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Wolfgang Lutz
Wolfgang Lutz University of Trier
Martin Hautzinger
Martin Hautzinger University of Tübingen
Eric Leibing
Eric Leibing University of Göttingen
Jürgen Hoyer
Jürgen Hoyer TU Dresden
Stefan G. Hofmann
Stefan G. Hofmann Philipp University of Marburg
Falk Leichsenring
Falk Leichsenring University of Giessen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens up diverse and flexible career pathways in counseling, mental health, education, and research. With increasing demand for behavioral health professionals, students are seeking affordable programs to maximize their investment and minimize student debt.

Many U.S. states and cities now offer a range of economical online options. For example, students can review the most affordable psychology degree programs in Indiana, which provide both online and on-campus choices. Similarly, those living near Kentucky can compare their options in the region by checking the most affordable psychology degree programs in Kentucky and looking specifically at affordable psychology programs in Louisville for localized options.

If you are based on the West Coast, you can explore the cheapest psychology degrees in Los Angeles for cost-effective pathways to a psychology career.

Affordable programs make it easier to pursue rewarding jobs in social services, human resources, or even graduate study, without overwhelming financial burdens. Start your search with the affordable psychology programs in Louisville and similar programs across the country to find the right fit for your goals and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Ulrich Stangier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles